douple

douple

Joined on Jan 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16

what i see is a raise of m42 lens prices ..

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 08:46 UTC as 317th comment
In reply to:

oluv: no pancake zoom? WTF?

street photography lens, no need to zoom

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 08:43 UTC
On P1000420 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

thats pretty good for 1600 iso

Direct link | Posted on Jul 22, 2012 at 09:18 UTC as 1st comment
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot SX150 IS review article (86 comments in total)

meh, you guys should do proper review of Fuji x10, when the final sensor clicked into camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2012 at 10:23 UTC as 31st comment

nice one .. and now, gimme a complete camera review please

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2012 at 18:01 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies
On 5D3_5788 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

MichaelSpotts: Great dynamic range.

do you see any clipping? i am not.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2012 at 09:52 UTC
On PT3C8920_ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (15 comments in total)

just perfect

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2012 at 09:42 UTC as 5th comment
On IMG_0031-ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Nikon! blasphemy!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 21:40 UTC as 3rd comment
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)

iam quite impressed, g1x 12800 looks similar to Powershot G12 3200

Posted on Feb 16, 2012 at 19:25 UTC as 56th comment
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vladik: Looks like soup! Why even bother release this junk.

um, have you tried comparsion with dslrs?

Posted on Feb 16, 2012 at 19:25 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery article (425 comments in total)

as always, radical pro people and con people .. lets wait for review. At this moment its a waste of time to judge pre-product.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 09:40 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery article (425 comments in total)
In reply to:

keepreal: Part II

1679550 was taken at f/3.5 and even at this large aperture the definition and lack of chromatic aberration to the corners are very good, so it appears that the lens improves a lot increasing the focal length to 19mm.

This is fairly good performance from a compact sensor for a camera at a fairly modest price. The Olympus C-5060 I bought and passed onto my son is better than this and does have a compact camera sized sensor!. If these shots are truly representative then for a frame approaching APS-C and a price of 700 GBP this camera is rubbish.

Also, the DP Review studio test images are very, very poor. There is next to nothing to judge fine detail anywhere, let alone the corners. Why did they not use something similar if not identical to those before? Maybe a commission from Canon?

I look forward to a proper test, of course.

And Oly is 14mpx for sure too, right? This comparsion doesnt make sense

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:29 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery article (425 comments in total)

Well, overall its pretty awesome, but some parts (passage picture) have surprisingly messed details. Anyway, cant wait for review!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2012 at 19:52 UTC as 120th comment
In reply to:

Valentinian: Wake up Canon ! Didn't you see the Sony oled EVF ? didn't you notice the Nikon fast plane phase AF ? Don't you see that the time is now for a professional mirrorless large sensor camera?
Wait a little more time, and Panasonic, Olympus, Sony and Fuji will take over the market....

I really dont think so. Canon will sell tons of these cameras, no matter how many minor "bugs" it will contain.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2012 at 19:10 UTC

Its monday! :)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2012 at 19:08 UTC as 20th comment
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (778 comments in total)
In reply to:

AvanGarde: What a bunch of whiners ! This is truly great camera.If you buy DSLR you buy mostly with kit which is 3.5-5.6 this G1X lens has longer range (kits usually upto 88-90mm this camera is 112 and only a bit darker on long end 5.6 vs 5.8) now find me kit that starts with 2.8 huh ?
Canon basically killed m/4 market and I suppose Panasonic/Olympus with release compact with m/4 sensor.Believe or not 28-112mm is more than enough for most people who would run with shorter kits anyway.I hate to carry lens as most people.
Basically you can same as entry level DSLR quality or marginally lower with much smaller and pockatable camera with a bit better and longer zoom than kit DSLR - that's the point of this camera.Win !

Yes, large sensor is big advantage (and maybe the only advantage nowadays (5.6 on the zoom end is horrible feature)), but everything (for most people) depends on price as well. In europe, expected price is about 770€, which is pretty expensive for "dslr-like" camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 11:07 UTC
Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16