photo nuts

photo nuts

Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 4, 2006

Comments

Total: 955, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (736 comments in total)

It's really wonderful that Panasonic shows the world how compact cameras ought to be designed and built.

This is definitely the new yardstick for compact cameras.

Too bad the camera did not arrive in time when I needed a compact. Also, a bit more pricey than my US$320 EOS-M. Anyway, if any of my friends or family wants a compact camera, the LX100 will be my recommendation.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08 UTC as 118th comment | 2 replies

US$750 for a slow zoom lens... hmmm...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 02:57 UTC as 28th comment | 6 replies

Looks good. Shadow pushing at both high and low ISO seems to work well.

If only the camera is not so heavy... Sigh

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 02:23 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

cpkuntz: Typical Canon dull colors, plastic skin, mushy details, and blown highlights. In 2012 these sensors were badly beaten. Now they are embarrassing.

Well said Zeisschen. The other comments from cpkuntz sound like what a typical troll will say.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 02:13 UTC
In reply to:

photo nuts: Compare and contrast Canon's response to difficult questions against how Sony and Nikon's reps handle them.

Sad day for Canon. Sigh

1) DPReview: We had an issue with the A7R with shutter vibration reducing resolution in certain situations. How do you incorporate feedback like this from your users?

Sony: We take the feedback and make note of it, and we use it to improve the next generation of products.

2) DPReview: The D600 had a well-publicized problem with oil on its sensor, which affected a lot of your customers. A lot of people were very unhappy with Nikon’s response. If something like this comes up again in the future, would you handle things differently?

Nikon: Internally, we took that issue very seriously... But the D600 issue was very important, and very sensitive and we are trying our best to avoid that kind of problem again.

@Timbukto: The sensor question is not about the 7D2. The Canon 5D Mk III, 70D are old products that get compared to the Nikon D800, D7000. So, the question about Canon sensors offering poor low ISO DR is a valid one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 23:28 UTC

Great to see DPReview using the Nikon D4S to photograph Canon's new products above.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 23:24 UTC as 84th comment
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: Who are you people and why are you so angry at Canon? And why is the anger so personal? It's like Canon killed your father and you have been itching for vengeance since age seven. Except Canon didn't kill your father, they simply made a decision not to put WIFI in the 7DMkII.

There are lots of camera companies to choose from; if you don't like what Canon is offering try another brand - and try to be happy with it. Being serial grumps must be exhausting.

Because this is the world wide web and people can hide behind their computers.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 23:20 UTC

We cannot take what Mr. Maeda says seriously. This guy either has NO CLUE what he is saying, is a compulsive liar or is simply delusional.

Read this DPReview interview in 2013 with the same mad man.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0336328811/cp-2013-interview-with-canons-masaya-maeda

"However, he ruled out the idea of a larger sensor camera along the lines of the Sony RX100 to offer more of an image quality distinction between smartphones and compact cameras. 'I think the market does exist but it wouldn't be very large. We think we have a good balancing point in terms of price, image quality and size. Lots of other combinations are possible, but, once you go below APS-C the next logical size is 1/2.3 inch', he says."

1 year after the interview, we get the G7X with the RX100 sensor. Ha, ha....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 23:17 UTC as 86th comment | 9 replies

Compare and contrast Canon's response to difficult questions against how Sony and Nikon's reps handle them.

Sad day for Canon. Sigh

1) DPReview: We had an issue with the A7R with shutter vibration reducing resolution in certain situations. How do you incorporate feedback like this from your users?

Sony: We take the feedback and make note of it, and we use it to improve the next generation of products.

2) DPReview: The D600 had a well-publicized problem with oil on its sensor, which affected a lot of your customers. A lot of people were very unhappy with Nikon’s response. If something like this comes up again in the future, would you handle things differently?

Nikon: Internally, we took that issue very seriously... But the D600 issue was very important, and very sensitive and we are trying our best to avoid that kind of problem again.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 23:03 UTC as 88th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

BarnET: How would you characterize the typical EOS 7D owner?

The user profile of 7D owners is ‘high amateur’ and enthusiasts who want high framerates and professional photographers who want a lightweight, fast camera. And also anyone who doesn’t want to carry something big and heavy.

http://camerasize.com/compact/#568.303,520.359,ha,t
just for reference the mirrorless equivelant.

The Canon weighs almost 1 Kg more with the roughly similar image quality.
great. Yeah I would consider it for not buying something heavy.

Besides I want Wifi which makes the 7D mk2 even more bulky with that 849 Wifi grip smacked on the bottom.

If the 7D2 weighed the same as the 70D and has a touchscreen (what is the point of DPAF without one), I would have considered getting it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 22:40 UTC
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (328 comments in total)

To Richard Butler:
Your comparisons to the 70-200 f/2.8 lenses on APS-C cameras make no sense to me.

While the mirrorless offerings have an equivalent focal length of ~ 70-200 on FF, mounting the 70-200 f/2.8 lenses on APS-C cameras result in ~ 105-300 on FF.

That is not a fair comparison.

Why not compare the various ~ 50-150 f/2.8 lenses on crop cameras to 70-200 f/2.8 or f/4 on FF. While the f/4 version on FF is slower by a stop, the DOF are comparable.

IMO, I'll take 70-200 f/4 on FF any day over 50-150 f/2.8 on APS-C. The only exception is the Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8 for m43. Why Olympus chooses to go down the 40-150 f/2.8 route beats me.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 16:50 UTC as 43rd comment | 3 replies
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (434 comments in total)

Was all excited about the LX100 until I read this little blip:

"The original version of this article stated that the LX100 has a touchscreen, which is not the case. We are very sorry for any confusion caused." - http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx100

So, out of the 3 competing cameras, Sony RX100 III vs Panasonic LX100 vs Canon G7X, only the G7X has a touchscreen which is very important for changing AF in a small format camera.

Sigh.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 04:46 UTC as 55th comment | 10 replies
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2589 comments in total)

Same old same old 11+ stops of dynamic range at base ISO?

Sigh Sigh Sigh

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 12:42 UTC as 589th comment | 5 replies
On Samsung NX1 First Impressions Review preview (912 comments in total)

Can't wait to see how the BSI APS-C sensor holds up. :)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 11:21 UTC as 194th comment
In reply to:

photo nuts: Probably appeals to many, but with bulbous front element and weight of 1.1 kg, I don't care very much for it.

@Plastek: quality... you mean you already know this is going to be a quality lens even though it's under development? Wow! Simply wow! Can I have some of whatever you are smoking?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 12:34 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1238 comments in total)
In reply to:

phoenix15: as ex nikonian, I don't understand why Nikon puts too many FF body in the market.

From http://www.dslrbodies.com/newsviews/camera-pricing-has-been.html

"...we’re seeing the industry shifting to higher priced products as volume declines."

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 08:08 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1238 comments in total)

Wow... 109 comments within a short space of time...

I am seriously impressed with the D750 specs. Great release.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 08:05 UTC as 307th comment | 6 replies

Probably appeals to many, but with bulbous front element and weight of 1.1 kg, I don't care very much for it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 07:56 UTC as 43rd comment | 10 replies
On Fujifilm announces weather-resistant XF 50-140mm F2.8 article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: I love all the Fuji haters out in force. I tell ya one thing...I have been far more impressed with the quality of the 23/35/18-55 Fuji lenses I have compared to most of the Canon lenses I've owned....

Don't know about others but I don't hate Fujifilm. I love their sensors. But you have to face it: the weight and price of this lens are somewhat ridiculous when compared to its peers. It's designed for APS-C mirrorless mount!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 06:23 UTC
On Fujifilm announces weather-resistant XF 50-140mm F2.8 article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo nuts: Canon EF 70-200 f/4 IS weighs 760 g. Price is US$1299.

Sony FE 70-200 f/4 OSS weighs 840 g. Price is US$1498.

Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8 OIS (equiv. to 70-200 f/5.6) weighs 360 g!!! Price is US$1498.

Fujifilm XF 50-140 f/2.8 (equiv. to 76-213 mm f/4.2) weighs 995 g. No stabilisation. Price is US$1599.

Wow. Just wow.

Fujifilm and Sony lenses provide ZERO weight advantage for their mirrorless mounts.

@kangoo1707: DXO takes sensor performance into account when they rate their lenses. Stupid, I know, but that's how it's done at DXO.

@Clint: So, Fuji version is stabilized. But compare its weight to Panasonic f/2.8 version... if, as you say, not everything is about DOF. :D

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 06:15 UTC
Total: 955, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »