D200_4me

D200_4me

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Feb 2, 2006
About me:

http://www.thephotographyhobbyist.com/ is where you'll find most of my photos. :-)

Comments

Total: 154, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On National Park Service bans drones in Yosemite article (170 comments in total)

Good...

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 08:20 UTC as 72nd comment | 1 reply
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2291 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: I would actually be interested in buying one of these in the future, were it not for the unreasonable price of the lenses. Also, Leica lost some credibility in my mind when re-branding the Panasonic point and shoot cameras and charging a much higher price for it. Don't insult our intelligence.

For the record, I think companies have the right to charge whatever they want. But naturally people will notice the price difference if two products are comparable in build and features and the only meaningful difference is the price. I'm not a Leica hater. I'd love to have some Leica gear, but I can buy much less expensive gear and get great final results and even have a better overall user experience (more functional/modern gear, etc), so why pay for just the name? I suppose it's just the market they want to put themselves in.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:23 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2291 comments in total)

I would actually be interested in buying one of these in the future, were it not for the unreasonable price of the lenses. Also, Leica lost some credibility in my mind when re-branding the Panasonic point and shoot cameras and charging a much higher price for it. Don't insult our intelligence.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:04 UTC as 602nd comment | 2 replies
On Drone films SpaceX rocket launch and landing article (73 comments in total)

Cool video of the rocket....but regarding drone photography in general...it's the new "Me too! Me too!" thing these days, isn't it?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 23, 2014 at 10:19 UTC as 26th comment | 3 replies
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (611 comments in total)

The Nikon D700 was the last camera I truly enjoyed and felt content to keep for 3 years (instead of upgrading too often). Ever since I sold my D700 a few years ago, I've been wandering in the photographic wilderness looking for the next D700 to satisfy me. Several mirrorless/CSC cameras later and even a D600 later, I think someone has finally released a camera I can be content with for the next couple years. The X-T1 of course. The more I use it, the more I love it. I have the E-M1 also, but I'm debating selling it, even though I love the camera. Especially the body and it's features/functions (like the 5 axis IBIS and touch screen). Anyone that says there's no difference between the image quality of the X-T1 and E-M1 needs to have their eyes checked. There absolutely is a difference (noticeable), even at base ISO, if you feel like pixel peeping. The X-T1 files are crystal clear and sharp at base ISO. Emphasis on crystal clear. Wow...the files are very impressive to me.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 17:19 UTC as 160th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (611 comments in total)

Currently owning both the E-M1 and X-T1 and having recently sold my last D-SLR (D600), I've had the opportunity to compare these different models/types. The more I use the X-T1, the more I love it. The image quality is stellar and the images I'm getting even with the 18-55 lens are the best I've ever shot, period.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 15:23 UTC as 181st comment | 1 reply

Commence rolling of the eyes...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2014 at 20:04 UTC as 16th comment
On Behind the scenes: Garry Winogrand at work article (52 comments in total)
In reply to:

LeitzKameraAktion: Very interesting film! But could anyone walk about with a camera in a busy street today, snapping away in people's faces like this, and not get accosted or arrested?

I know a lot of people here like that sort of thing ('street shooting')...but, well....rather than cause a stir, I'll just say it's not my thing. I enjoy shooting building and the city as a whole (when I'm actually in one), but rarely do I focus on people unless something extraordinary is going on. Otherwise I'm content to let people live their lives and not have to worry about me posting photos of them online. I've seen some people do it in a tasteful way though...that style of shooting I mean.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 11:43 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3: a quick summary article (596 comments in total)

I'll give Nikon credit for sticking with it, but honestly, I always feel like they're not realizing the full potential of this system. With a more desirable body with the right controls AND a very good sensor, it would be a very popular system. The 1 series gets a lot of complaints from people that never even touched these cameras, but having owned the V1 and V2, I have to say there's more to it than you think. In the end, I just couldn't stay committed to it, given the availability of other small, great products like the Oly E-M1 and the Fuji X series.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 10:06 UTC as 50th comment | 1 reply

Meanwhile...the magical unicorns controlling the in-body VR inside my E-M1 continues to do a better job than my former Nikkor lenses. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 23:17 UTC as 53rd comment | 5 replies

I just got an email from Nikon regarding this advisory since I have my D600 registered. So I say good for them for contacting buyers directly and letting them know this is available. But yes, of course it would have been nice to have it acknowledged and taken care of like this sooner before everyone got all bent out of shape about it. They're fixing it, so maybe there's not so much need for all the hysteria. Am I thrilled to pay $2,000 for a camera (with lens) and have this problem? Of course not, but that's life.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 21:32 UTC as 78th comment

I'll avoid the conspiracy theories and company-bashing and simply say, it's too bad they didn't do this sooner, but it doesn't really matter much to me. They already replaced my shutter several months ago and I don't really see a huge problem with dust/debris...but it's probably more than I see on my mirrorless cameras that have the sensor exposed as soon as you remove the lens. Anyway, I think this is my last DSLR purchase. Not because of the dust issue, but because cameras like the Fuji X-T1, Olympus E-M1 and so on are just as good or better, except for a very few exceptions. Don't get too worked up people. Calm down. It's just a camera. Life goes on, I promise.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 11:58 UTC as 112th comment

Glad to hear that, regarding the Fuji profiles. Looking forward to it. I love the Olympus profiles for my E-M1.

I swear I'm always baffled by people that complain about the price of updating Lightroom to the newest version. Seriously? They'll spend thousands on gear but can't fork over $79 to upgrade an excellent editing tool every year or so? Amazing.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 00:02 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies
On Miggo Strap and Grip review article (86 comments in total)

I still love the good ole neck strap. Not the one that comes with the camera, but an aftermarket strap. I don't understand the appeal of straps like these because for me, it's much more convenient to have both of my hands free at a moment's notice. With a neck strap, that's easy. But if you've got a camera strapped to your wrist...not so easy. I know some people dismiss neck straps as something 'amateurs' and tourists use, but I do love my neck straps, regardless ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2014 at 12:25 UTC as 34th comment
In reply to:

Smeggypants: "So you find that in America your customers equate physical size with quality?"

LOL :) - They got that right. :) :)

That certainly seems to be the case here. It's a shame, but it's true. When I'm out on vacation with my full frame D-SLR, people sort of look at it and I can tell they're admiring it (if it's bigger than their entry-level DSLR). But when I'm out with my micro four thirds camera, they give a quick glance and look away as if they're not interested. I suppose they assume it's just a point and shoot bridge camera or something and therefore not a 'real' high quality image maker ;-) Too bad for them. They don't know any better.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 17, 2014 at 14:53 UTC
On John Stanmeyer wins World Press Photo of the Year article (83 comments in total)

Attention Pixel Peepers: Note that the photo is very high ISO and has plenty of noise in the shadows. Let that be a lesson to you as you endlessly debate who's got the best pixels and therefore can make the best photos. Go out and shoot and enjoy yourself. Don't worry about the noise. Just worry about making a photo that means something to you or someone else. That should be what matters. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 18:59 UTC as 50th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

bluevellet: The 300mm is bulky and kinda slow for a prime.

But that 7-14 f2.8 zoom is sweet. Finally an alternative to the slower panny 7-14.

Look at the equiv full frame lens, the Canon 600mm f/4 and think again about that "kinda bulky" statement ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51 UTC
On Panasonic announces 4K-capable Lumix DMC-GH4 article (118 comments in total)

*Yawn*....

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2014 at 17:47 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On Tamrac launches rugged-looking photo messenger bags article (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

contadorfan: I realize there aren't a lot of women on this site, but it would be nice if DPR would review some of the fashionable camera bags for women: Kelly Moore, JoTotes, EpihanieBags, CheekyLime. Those are bags that a gal wouldn't feel like a dork for carrying one around, yet I wonder how comfortable and practical they are for a day out with a camera & several lenses.

I think Tamrac's 'Aria' line is targeted for women. I think so anyway....

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 14:29 UTC
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (919 comments in total)

Sounds like many commentators here are opposed to anything mildly 'retro', even if the intent is to give the user a nice feeling/looking camera. Maybe manufacturers should be banned from building anything other than an ultra-modern, rounded featureless blob? I guess that would make everyone happy :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 20, 2014 at 14:09 UTC as 173rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 154, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »