D200_4me

D200_4me

Lives in United States United States
Has a website at http://www.openbloom.com/
Joined on Feb 2, 2006
About me:

www.openbloom.com is where you'll find most of my photos. :-)

Comments

Total: 151, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Assuming the new IS works well just like Oly's E-M1 with any lens attached, kudos to Sony. It's looking like a better and better system every day. I may have to break down and try one some day...even though I seem to have settled on the Fuji X-T1 and its system/lenses. I'd love to see an even better sensor in the new X-T1 version and with in-body 5 axis IS. Then I'd be in heaven. :-) Oh and even faster AF would be nice too, but not totally necessary for my particular shooting.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 11:36 UTC as 208th comment | 2 replies
On FroKnowsPhoto guide to DSLR video now available article (156 comments in total)

I used to watch his videos but over time it got to be a little much. He does have some good info to share, but I wish he'd just tone it down a little and be a little more Joe McNally or Bill Fortney type of humble teacher. I guess everyone has their style though. I just can't take it anymore so I unsubscribed from this YouTube channel. I really like that 'Michael the Mentor' guy on YouTube also. Very well made videos and not so in your face.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 22:28 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply

I think Fuji pulled off a good one with the 10-24. No big bulging bulb lens on the front so you can use filters if you really wanted to...and at 15 to 36mm, it's a very useful range. That said, Olympus has made some really nice pro lens. I just don't like that huge bulb lens on the end, like the Nikon 14-24 and other ultra wide lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 00:43 UTC as 61st comment | 1 reply

This is all hype and it would never be applied to normal photogs out shooting even for money. Only if you're obstructing access to other visitors or wanting to do something elaborate would this ever come into play. Internet hype. Calm down people....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:00 UTC as 84th comment | 1 reply

Nice to see his honesty when it comes to the video performance. Sounds like they do understand people are interested in video and that they need to make improvements. The new firmware coming is a good start.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2014 at 10:09 UTC as 41st comment
On Photokina 2014: Sony stand report article (78 comments in total)

Fido cam....awesome :-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 12:19 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

Treeshade: E-M1+40-150mm F2.8 Pro
Total cost: $2800
Total weight: 1377g

6D+EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L
Total cost: $3350
Total weight: 1820g

E-M1@150mm F2.8 ISO400 would have the same DoF, FoV and SS as 6D@300mm F5.6 ISO100. It is just trade-off between IQ and cost/weight (or other features that you like). Nothing wrong with choosing either lens (and system).

You're making too much sense. That's not allowed here ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 10:00 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1180 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: Looks like there's finally a D700 replacement. But I've moved on already. Who knows...if they had gave us a D700 replacement awhile ago, I might not have been so inclined to go looking elsewhere.

I guess you're right. There hasn't been a camera like the D700 in reality. I think the only camera that would be just like the D700 would be the D750 if it were to be in the body of the D810. I really loved the buttons and layout of my D700. It doesn't matter to me much now though, since I've switched away from Nikon. I enjoyed the cameras while I had them though (my DSLRs). It was time for me to go though. Anyway, look at the situation they're in. They can't really create a true D700 replacement now. If they do, it will kill the D810. In the past, it made sense because all there was was the D3/D3s and D700. Now, for them, they really can't create a D700 replacement. They've already gone too far down the D800/810 road.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 10:32 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1180 comments in total)

Looks like there's finally a D700 replacement. But I've moved on already. Who knows...if they had gave us a D700 replacement awhile ago, I might not have been so inclined to go looking elsewhere.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 09:48 UTC as 271st comment | 7 replies
On Fujifilm X100T Overview preview (624 comments in total)

Apparently, everyone is a camera/electrical/mechanical engineer these days...as well as a marketing specialist.

For the people actually interested in making photos, this still seems like a good camera. Though admittedly, not a camera that absolutely everyone will be interested in. You would think that's obvious....but it seems like we often have to be reminded of that fact.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 13:29 UTC as 100th comment | 2 replies
On P9400004_ISO125 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Hey this reminds me of the house the Graystones lived in on the Caprica series (TV) :-) Maybe it's the same house.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

D200_4me: My iphone has the release 5 version but in the app store I see the new version 6. I can't get it to update yet. I assume the updates might be staggered? Any way to force the update? I even deleted the app and reinstalled from the app store and it keeps pulling down version 5.0.13 so far. :-(

Later yesterday evening it offered me the new version 6. All good now. And the new editing controls are great.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 15:03 UTC

My iphone has the release 5 version but in the app store I see the new version 6. I can't get it to update yet. I assume the updates might be staggered? Any way to force the update? I even deleted the app and reinstalled from the app store and it keeps pulling down version 5.0.13 so far. :-(

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 21:17 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies
On New camera app features in Apple's iOS 8 post (67 comments in total)

Finally...separate focus and exposure selection. My most wanted feature.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 09:25 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

Shame it had that problem. Other than that black eye, the D600 made many wonderful images for me. Only other bad thing was the tiny AF area. In the end, it was the size/weight that finally got me to sell off all my D-SLR gear. Maybe I would have kept it longer though, had they given me a free D610 replacement ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 14:40 UTC as 45th comment
On Nikon issues firmware update for D800/D800E article (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

abortabort: Changelog:

1. Breaks compatibility with third party batteries.
2. Breaks compatibility with third party lenses.
3. Dangles some minor fix carrot to ensure users 'update' to 'take advantage' of features *1 and *2.
4. Fixes bug that allowed users to downgrade firmware to earlier versions.

Love

Nikon

"There is a reason why I don't have any Nikon equipment any more."
There's a lot of that going around. I didn't leave Nikon behind. They left me behind, so I moved on after being a longtime Nikon DSLR owner. I'm now happy in the X-T1 & E-M1 world.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 11:24 UTC
On National Park Service bans drones in Yosemite article (170 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: Good...

By the way, I said good because when I go on vacation, I want to enjoy it. I don't want some pro or pretend pro out there in the national parks buzzing a camera overhead while I'm trying to enjoy the views and relax. I'm a passionate hobby photographer and I understand people's desire to get a great shot, but in the end, you have to know when to say when. Drone photography in a popular national park with many people around is going too far and it's very annoying.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 09:57 UTC
On National Park Service bans drones in Yosemite article (170 comments in total)

Good...

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 08:20 UTC as 72nd comment | 1 reply
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2305 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: I would actually be interested in buying one of these in the future, were it not for the unreasonable price of the lenses. Also, Leica lost some credibility in my mind when re-branding the Panasonic point and shoot cameras and charging a much higher price for it. Don't insult our intelligence.

For the record, I think companies have the right to charge whatever they want. But naturally people will notice the price difference if two products are comparable in build and features and the only meaningful difference is the price. I'm not a Leica hater. I'd love to have some Leica gear, but I can buy much less expensive gear and get great final results and even have a better overall user experience (more functional/modern gear, etc), so why pay for just the name? I suppose it's just the market they want to put themselves in.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:23 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2305 comments in total)

I would actually be interested in buying one of these in the future, were it not for the unreasonable price of the lenses. Also, Leica lost some credibility in my mind when re-branding the Panasonic point and shoot cameras and charging a much higher price for it. Don't insult our intelligence.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:04 UTC as 600th comment | 2 replies
Total: 151, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »