D200_4me

D200_4me

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Feb 2, 2006
About me:

http://www.thephotographyhobbyist.com/ is where you'll find most of my photos. :-)

Comments

Total: 172, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

That's a clever idea.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 11:07 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mark Alan Thomas: Here’s the link to the Lightroom 6 Standalone version which Adobe has basically hidden from customers:

https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/store/handlers/elicensing/trialconversion.cfm?productId=160&platform=Mac/Win&locale=en_us&marketSegment=com&skuType=FULL

Click “edit” to switch to upgrade pricing.

Boy...they sure do hide the regular desktop version.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 19:31 UTC
In reply to:

todds: Sounds like a great way to make a redundant backup of my backup.

Is there backup software for windows or do I need to manually copy files to the cloud?

Does it really change my folder organization?

Apparently I already have unlimited photo storage as a Prime member. I was wondering the same thing though about being able to manually upload via soft type of backup software like Syncback or something else. I mean, something I can manually trigger to happen at will...but not something I have to take many steps to do the backups, which would be annoying. If it can be made to be very easy via a few clicks to start the backup, I'd be interested in that. I'll have to research it :-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 21:37 UTC
In reply to:

Richard Franiec: This could be one of the back up option to consider.
What is the advantage of using the Amazon storage over, for example, Carbonite?

Sounds like you have more of an issue with a radio personality than you do with a product. ;-) Lighten up. Life is too short to be so bitter all the time...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 21:30 UTC

Nice samples. They should let you do all the sample galleries from now on ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 23:08 UTC as 30th comment

I really like some of these. Very nice. But me personally, I've never been too keen on the competitions. I just never got a good feeling or impression of photography competitions and (usually, but not always) the type of people that gravitate towards this type of recognition. I do enjoy sharing photos I'm happy with online because it's nice to get some feedback and some "I like that" comments now and then. Who wouldn't enjoy that? :-) A simple acknowledgement that your practice and effort paid off, in the form of a nice photo. I also tend to avoid social media sharing of photos and Google Plus has gotten really bad about 'attention wh@res'. Everyone's a new Nat Geo photographer on there and nearly everyone's in a competition for 'likes' and reshares. I'm content these days to avoid all that and pay my $150 per year to smugmug to show my photos and with no comments enabled. The stats on my galleries (number of views) is enough pat on the back for me to know I'm doing ok.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 16:54 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies
On Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Review preview (87 comments in total)

Get an equally small Sony a6000 that will destroy this droid's image quality and call it a day. Maybe the android aspects of this device will appeal to some people, but just looking at the camera specs, I can't help but think "why bother?" Maybe if a full blown android OS was running on an a6000, that would get a lot more interesting.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36 UTC as 29th comment
On CP+ 2015: Hands-on with new Pentax K-S2 article (195 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: Olive green color. That must be the hiding in the woods voyeur version ;-)

I'll give them credit for trying something new. DSLRs need some modern updates as far as the aesthetics go (but needs to remain functional). They don't need to be extreme with it, but little modern touches here and there and some very nice, tasteful color options would be welcome. I really can't stand those horrible red cameras manufacturers put out.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 16:17 UTC
On CP+ 2015: Hands-on with new Pentax K-S2 article (195 comments in total)

Olive green color. That must be the hiding in the woods voyeur version ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 16:09 UTC as 37th comment | 3 replies
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II First Impressions Review preview (1392 comments in total)

Excellent improvements to the body...for sure. I'm surprised they continued with the E-M5 after the E-M5 came out.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 10:24 UTC as 292nd comment
On 3,200MP LSST camera gets construction approval article (257 comments in total)

I'm sure many here will have the usual complaint that it can't shoot 11 fps while tracking the subject so it's garbage for sports.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2015 at 09:14 UTC as 83rd comment
On Canon 7D mirror box filmed at 10,000fps article (175 comments in total)

Good explanation of how the shutter works and what 'rolling shutter' is. I guess my question is, does the shutter somehow reset after each shot so the curtains would always be traveling from top to bottom??? I didn't see anything like that in the video. Just the single top to bottom travel.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 31, 2015 at 19:54 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (374 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: One thing's for sure. The Sony fans are very enthusiastic about the 'a' lineup (a6000, a7). I looked at them and tried to get interested, but for whatever reasons, it just doesn't do it for me. More of a feeling I suppose rather than a statement about the gear's abilities. After I bought the a6000, that was pretty much it for me. I lost interested in even thinking about going down the Sony road. I'll keep the a6000 as my little point and shoot type camera, but no more Sony gear for me.

Well, I meant the alpha line in general but more specifically the former NEX line and the new A7 cameras. I wasn't thinking about the more traditional/older former Minolta/Sony line.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 16:00 UTC
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (374 comments in total)

One thing's for sure. The Sony fans are very enthusiastic about the 'a' lineup (a6000, a7). I looked at them and tried to get interested, but for whatever reasons, it just doesn't do it for me. More of a feeling I suppose rather than a statement about the gear's abilities. After I bought the a6000, that was pretty much it for me. I lost interested in even thinking about going down the Sony road. I'll keep the a6000 as my little point and shoot type camera, but no more Sony gear for me.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 14:36 UTC as 58th comment | 4 replies
On The Wild Southwest: Jory Vander Galien's landscapes article (60 comments in total)

Need a bubble level? Really? Nikon Says :-)...

"With the D800/D800E, you can always check the LCD monitor or the viewfinder for both the camera's position in relation to the horizontal plane and its pitch (forward or rear rotation). This can enhance compositional accuracy, particularly when shooting still lifes, landscapes and architecture."

Even my old D600 (sold) has one.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2015 at 15:08 UTC as 29th comment
On Fujifilm announces X-A2 with selfie-friendly LCD article (132 comments in total)

Well it seems the "it must be tiny (even if it's so tiny it not as easy to operate) and it must have all the same features as camera x" crowd is still alive and kicking...and complaining, as usual. Probably complaining about something they'd never be interested in buying anyway.

So let me get this straight. Everyone wants a cameras as tiny as a small point and shoot with a 24-500mm f/1.2 zoom lens that retracts into the body so it's pocketable....but the camera still must have all the dials, controls, image quality and functions of a Nikon D4S, otherwise the manufacturer failed completely and is clueless. Is that right?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2015 at 11:59 UTC as 22nd comment | 3 replies
On Fujifilm announces XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR lens article (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: It's always fun to watch people defend their camera/lens choices/purchases. It's almost as bad as watching sports ;-)

I enjoy camera tech in general. I have a few brand 'preferences', but only because those brands typically have what I want/need. Otherwise, I don't really worry about who came out with what new lens or body unless it's becoming clear over time that the brand I bought/preferred is not addressing certain needs or wants I have. But I don't like to argue with others online about what I'm shooting with and why. It's good to compare products so you know what you're dealing with, but many people take it too far and argue and defend their preferred brand. That's silly.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 11:00 UTC
On Fujifilm announces XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR lens article (295 comments in total)

It's always fun to watch people defend their camera/lens choices/purchases. It's almost as bad as watching sports ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 09:03 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies

I guess i was under the impression that Nat Geo photos should never be heavily post-processed. I suppose I'm wrong.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2014 at 12:22 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On Seattle PI.com showcases its 'pictures of the year' article (29 comments in total)

Love this shot....the one of the cowboy and horse. Fantastic lighting.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2014 at 17:49 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
Total: 172, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »