mbb101

mbb101

Joined on Jun 24, 2012

mbb101's recent activity

  • Yes but to a lesser extent - there is always going to be some smearing of detail in JPEGs at high ISO it appears to be far worse in the X100S than the Xpro 1
  • Bill Robb wrote: Graham Hill wrote: Ed B wrote: Graham Hill wrote: This phenomena has been shown in great detail, over and over and over again. The X-E2 shows sledgehammer amounts of noise at...
  • For completeness here is the X-pro 1 OOC JPEG iso 6400 Xpro 1 OOC JPG
  • Added 1 photo to their gallery
    Xpro 1 OOC
  • Thats at 100% when viewed at 50% it is even smoother and waxier. That effect is not normal for the Xtrans sensor because the X pro 1 OOC jpg is much closer to the raw and does not exhibit that...
  • iso 6400 X100S RAW converted in PN to JPEG  iso 6400 OOC JPEG  The remark about over 30 was merely remarking that a baby's skin is so smooth that the waxy effect would not be noticeable these pics...
  • Added 1 photo to their gallery
    raw converted to jpeg in photo ninja
  • Added 1 photo to their gallery
    OOC jpg also iso 6400
  • The simple truth is the test is extremely easy. You take a portrait at iso 6400 in raw + jpg and output the raw in your favourite program and compare with the jpg OOC. Whilst the plastic skin...
  • Here is a pic from my old X10 taken some time ago and PP'd in Aperture all that was necessary was reduce the saturation and adjust the hue and luminance in the red channel and some sharpening.
  • Added 2 photos to their gallery
    flower originalflower PP
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
mbb101 has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 35
Threads started 1
Last post 2 months ago
Total comments 0
Total likes 0
Total reviews 0
Total articles 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 21
Last upload 2 months ago