Zyankarlo

Zyankarlo

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Feb 12, 2012

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zyankarlo: Do not understand the fighting here! For any interested buyers it is the most comfortable situation ever: you can choose between Canon and Nikon without any bigger drawbacks in IQ...
- take a D800, if MPs is important for you and ISO 1600 is enough
- get a MK3, if ISO 3200 is useful for you and if you hate transfering 36 MP files
- get a D4 or 1Dx, if you want more speed, a more constant high dynamic range using higher ISOs and a adult building

@marike: ...the D800 offers the highest DR, yes, but only at ISO 100-200...above 200 the D4 offers more DR and more color depth, too. If you take city pictures with shadows using some tele sometimes, then you are better with a D4 or 1Dx...

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:48 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zyankarlo: Do not understand the fighting here! For any interested buyers it is the most comfortable situation ever: you can choose between Canon and Nikon without any bigger drawbacks in IQ...
- take a D800, if MPs is important for you and ISO 1600 is enough
- get a MK3, if ISO 3200 is useful for you and if you hate transfering 36 MP files
- get a D4 or 1Dx, if you want more speed, a more constant high dynamic range using higher ISOs and a adult building

@marike: ...the D800 offers the highest DR, yes, but onky at ISO 100-200...above 200 the D4 offers more DR and more color depth, too. If you take city pictures with shadows using some tele sometimes, then you are better with a D4 or 1Dx...

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:47 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)

Do not understand the fighting here! For any interested buyers it is the most comfortable situation ever: you can choose between Canon and Nikon without any bigger drawbacks in IQ...
- take a D800, if MPs is important for you and ISO 1600 is enough
- get a MK3, if ISO 3200 is useful for you and if you hate transfering 36 MP files
- get a D4 or 1Dx, if you want more speed, a more constant high dynamic range using higher ISOs and a adult building

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 14:36 UTC as 63rd comment | 4 replies
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)

...never interested in the CANONs because there are more excellent lenses from NIKON - the NIKKOR 14-24mm alone is a good example!
BUT: When does the NIKON D4 review appear here? I guess the D4 will get a score of 90% because the D3s got 89% ;-)

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2012 at 11:01 UTC as 150th comment | 5 replies
On Just Posted: In-depth Nikon D800 review article (541 comments in total)

D800, D800, D800...really not bad, but no one needs it really - an improved 24MP-D3Xs sensor would have been much better, or? ;-) When does the review of the D4 appear here finally?

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 16:59 UTC as 39th comment
On Just Posted: Nikon D4 Studio Test Samples article (309 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zyankarlo: It is clear, that Nikon has improved the JPG modus: the JPGs of the D4 are showing more detail and a bit less noise. BUT: The raw files of the D3s show less noise (even if you resize the D4 files to 12 MP).

For both cams 12800 ISO seems to be the limit if you want a clear detailed picture processed from raw. So for me this D4 would be only interesting if it would have come with 18 MP or more. 12 MP or 16 Mp? ...who cares...and the D3s has the better battery ;-)

2.000mAh vs. 2.500mAh...what are you expecting? ;-)

And: EN-EL4a (D3) ca. 100 Euro
EN-EL18 (D4) ca. 160 Euro

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2012 at 12:48 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III preview (901 comments in total)

Sorry, dear CANON photographers, but from ISO 1600 on these pictures are looking so artificial: Such a unnatural looking NR! I was really surprised - coming from the NIKON D4/D3s samples... ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2012 at 12:41 UTC as 248th comment
On Just Posted: Nikon D4 Studio Test Samples article (309 comments in total)

It is clear, that Nikon has improved the JPG modus: the JPGs of the D4 are showing more detail and a bit less noise. BUT: The raw files of the D3s show less noise (even if you resize the D4 files to 12 MP).

For both cams 12800 ISO seems to be the limit if you want a clear detailed picture processed from raw. So for me this D4 would be only interesting if it would have come with 18 MP or more. 12 MP or 16 Mp? ...who cares...and the D3s has the better battery ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2012 at 12:29 UTC as 66th comment | 4 replies

The problem here is not the cam, but the lenses. The full size Japanese pictures out of the D800 showed in the net are partially problematic already: the Nikkor 24-70 flags here because of centering problems! Even for my only 12MP-D3 i have to use well selected fixed focal lenses to get even sharp pictures at 8, so you can imagine how "easy" it will be to get good lenses for this D800 with 36MP! I guess the wise limit is around 20MP, there you have a chance to be able to use a zoom - trying 5 and getting 1 really sharp one! ;-) I would find a well updated D3X much better, now we got something like the SONY A900 again, on the manufacturer .com-site there is no D800 picture over ISO640 shown and visible noise starts up even at ISO320! :-(

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2012 at 10:31 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9