Lives in United Kingdom Norfolk, UK, United Kingdom
Works as a Pro Photographer
Has a website at
Joined on Jan 11, 2009


Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6

Is the dMax of 4.0 good for scanning transparencies ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2014 at 18:47 UTC as 50th comment | 3 replies
On How Peter Hurley became a top portrait photographer article (49 comments in total)

So it's not what you know, but who you know ... and he got lucky.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2014 at 16:29 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies

Don't Getty realise that if they cut off the hands that feed them, they will eventually go hungry.

Getty has almost single handedly destroyed the traditional stock industry and continues to hammer nails into the coffin ... Thanks again Getty.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2014 at 08:18 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

toomanycanons: First thing they'll do is change how photographers are paid for their images. From now on the photographer will pay Getty Images for the privilege of giving them their work. It's a new day.

We already do ! Photographers Choice brand demands $50 submission fee per image and Getty still rob 75% of the fee. Sad times. Getty, microstock and royalty free have killed the stock photo industry forever.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2012 at 18:59 UTC

So why can't we all club together and do something about it ?

The fact that Getty and co have managed to get away with all this for so long is ludicrous.

The split should be 75% / 25% in the photographers favour.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2012 at 09:00 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

This is what we should do Rashomon - create our own library that puts photographers first.

Why can't this be done ? Without new stock Getty would go out of business. We need some solidarity amongst the ranks.

For the life of me, I can't understand how photographers allow Getty to take the 75-80% lion's share of an image sale after we've paid for the shoot, edited and submitted.

This is why photographers are now going out of business as Getty has canibalised the photographic industry and raped their contributors to reap their own rich rewards.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2012 at 06:55 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6