andywhoa: Comparing the X-T2 and X-T1 RAWs, X-T2 is the clear winner in the center of the frame. That's expected with its higher resolution. However, some of the corners get taken by the X-T1 (ex: top left black/white circles). Is that purely a lens thing? Or can the sensor be at play here, too?
Also, the color bleeding with reds & blues is dramatically improved over the X-T1!
Sorry, I meant X-Pro2.
Comparing the X-T2 and X-T1 RAWs, X-T2 is the clear winner in the center of the frame. That's expected with its higher resolution. However, some of the corners get taken by the X-T1 (ex: top left black/white circles). Is that purely a lens thing? Or can the sensor be at play here, too?
jonathanj: Women's backpacks, fine, but can we have a bit less of the obscure made-up jargon? What exactly is a side pocket "drainage weep hole"? Googling the term just gives a lot of information about a technique in masonry wall construction.... I even looked at the kickstarter page, but it just looks like a normal pocket to me... Does it mean if the water gets in, there's a hole to let it drain out? Wouldn't a waterproof cover be a better addition?
Hole for water to get out.
Jim Evidon: To unhoh07:Good for you and very well put. I got my M9 back from Leica and it looks like a brand new camera.
Frankly, I've given up responding to the Leica haters. They complain about Leica high prices. But Leica cameras are all metal assembled with very close tolerancesand finished beautifully. It is a camera that is built with the reasonable expectation that it should last as long as the photographer using it.
Other cameras are priced within the buyers limits. That buyer will no doubt go back into the marketplace in 1 to 3 years in order to but the latest innovations. But do those innovations create a better image? Probably not. Our Leica's are built like a tank and are free of all the trendy garbage that in the final analysis contributes nothing to the final image.
You will never convince the critics otherwise. They no not want to be confused with facts.There is a saying that seems appropriate. "Never teach a pig to sing. It is a waste of time and it annoys the pig".
So this is where all my Kool-Aid went.
uhoh07: Also, why has the M9, MM or 240 have never, as far as I can tell, received a full review on this site? I did see an M8 review, and M9 preview, and a four page romp "shooting with the M9-P."
Love it or hate them, these are benchmark digital systems and can be easily rented, one has to wonder why such short shrift at DP?
Preferably such review would be done with the help of a working Leica pro, to avoid the all to common DP foible of "I can't get used to where they put such and such button".
The Leica takes practice to use effectively. I bought the M9 solely for the results with RF wide glass, and at first found the focus and framing method difficult real world. But 11 months later I far prefer the M9 to frame and focus over my A7 even at high speed.
Most hysterical is the DXO rating of the M9 sensor, which simply proves their numbers measure values which are irrelevant to many of us, and certainly have nothing at all to do with how sharp an image will be with a lens attached.
What is the point of reviewing Leica cameras?
The point of a review site is to allow those interested in purchasing gear to discover the pros/cons of that gear before spending their money. The site is generally going to review gear that is within the price range of the maximum number of people. Why spend time and money reviewing a product a very small fraction of readers are going to be able to purchase?
Besides, if you're willing to spend that much money on a Leica, you were going to buy the camera anyway.
So DPR is where all the people who never grew up go to present their opinions? Most of the comments here are embarrassing. Would you act this way in front of your parents?
forpetessake: What's wrong with DPR? How can they post such a superficial review? Did they use a camera for one day and rushed with the review? None of the serious shortcomings are even mentioned:* wrong (bloody) reds lacking details and color transitions* cyan ('aqua' according to Adobe) sky color* wax figure rendition of human faces* watercolor rendition in landscape shots
Reds and watercolor* are definitely issues with this camera.
Personally, the smearing (watercoloring) isn't as big of an issue as it is for everyone else. If you were to view foliage on a standard bayer array at 100%, the detail would have artifacts, too. However, those artifacts take on more of a blurring or fuzzy effect. The truth is, both standard bayer arrays and the X-Trans array do not handle tiny details well. They both have a problem. The reason the X-Trans smearing is getting so much grief is because nobody is used to that kind of effect.
I love how all the comments here are OM-D users squirming. Why do you care how the X-T1 is reviewed? An internet review of another camera doesn't affect your images. I suspect it makes you regret your decision, so you're lashing out.
Antony John: The area which I look at and that seems to be glossed over (except for JPEG) is the IQ from the camera. It appears neither as a pro or a con.I would have expected a comparison against the OMD cameras but this isn't available on the comparison function on the conclusions page.
When I go to the image quality sections, the OM-D E-M1 is the first camera next to the X-T1.
joyclick: K3 gets 83% (after all attempts to avoid reviewing it at all don't justify) and XT1 follows on its heels and gets 84%
I don't understand what you're complaining about here because your english isn't very good. Are you complaining about the K3's score? The X-T1 score? The order in which they were reviewed? I don't know anything about the K3, but the X-T1 has received near flawless reviews from everyone. As far as the ordering goes, 1 of them has to get done before the other. Does it matter which one?
What camera did you do this review with? When I attach my XF14mm to my X-T1, the focus distance display disappears from the camera's display. However, in your review, it is still present.
All right. Who is letting the interns design cameras?
Najinsky: Well, I'm (genuinely) happy for you guys who can make use of this but unfortunately my X100 is an ornament.
It's an ornament because it developed Sticky Aperture Blades and I can't get it fixed.
I can't get it fixed because Fuji won't publicly acknowledge the problem and insists it goes via warranty repair.
It can't go via warranty repair because the required warranty card and receipt were in a document wallet that got stolen in Thailand (all it had was receipts so the thief got nothing but deprived me of a fix).
They were being carried in the wallet in the vain hope of finding a repair centre while travelling, who spoke enough English to understand the problem in the absence of any public acknowledgement I could show them.
I know some of you get annoyed with me for beating down on Fuji for this, but you know what a great camera it is and I bet you'd feel the same if YOU lost the ability to use yours because of an unacknowledged manufacturing defect and bureaucracy.
Apparently, you're an idiot on top of being a liar.
You're just a flat out liar. I sent my X100 to Fuji USA for repair. It is arriving back at my home today. I never filled out my warranty card. Fuji did acknowledge the error and, for a time, was fixing all X100 cameras free of charge. Two years later, they are now charging a service fee ($140), but the $700 lens assembly is still free. Get a life, Mr Grumpy.
Edit: I should mention my X100 is 2 years old. I bought it at the end of 2011.
andywhoa: I feel like this camera received a silver award because so many people have been complaining about how many gold awards are being thrown out.
Top camera and "virtually untouchable" in it's class? SILVER AWARD!
@jkoch2 Maybe that's why they've never reviewed the Leica. The award would have to be made from mud.
I feel like this camera received a silver award because so many people have been complaining about how many gold awards are being thrown out.
TJGKG: It is bad enough the first version of this camera did not get a gold award when it clearly deserved one. But now the MkII version, which is supposedly better than the original, also gets a silver award you really have to question the ratings. Granted these are high marks but as someone who owns the first version of the camera, I can tell you it is extraordinary. Not only are the pictures fantastic, but the movies are incredible. In fact, the movies are far superior to movies on my other gear: the Nikon D7000 and the newly acquired Ricoh GR. The in camera charging is a nuisance but I bought an external charger for my spare battery so that issue is negated. I took this camera on vacation and it was just a pleasure to use with fantastic picutres.
Why are you comparing this camera to the GR, Nex 7, etc. They are two completely different classes of cameras. The RX100 is a truly pocketable compact. It's tiny. You can fit it into your jeans pocket. The GR, Nex cameras, Fuji X100, etc. fit in a large jacket pocket at best, and most of them have huge bulky interchangeable lenses.
DenWil: "iPhone Photographers" as a group should get over themselves and actually buy functional adjustable cameras. Phone cameras are a convenience for spur of the moment needs. They were never and should not be expected to supplant a 2.8 L lens on a DSLR with a FF 24MP sensor. 2.0 on a piece of glass 3mm across is not my idea of mechanical excellence. The obsession over this is comedy.
Get off your high horse, dude. Elitist is an ugly look.
Deleted pending purge: See here, https://www.abine.com/how-donottrackme-works/ , and pick what best suits your needs.Aside from that, the reasonable decision is to remove your contents and account from FB, and then be prepared for an avalanche of reminders, prods, and other "important" messages about how you should re-join. :P
Alexa MetricsAmazon AssociatesDoubleClickPinterest