Despite all these new images for several cameras, there are STILL no studio images for the A77ii JPEGs?? And, as you guys admit, there might be better lenses than the Sony 50 1.8? Any chance of those being shot before 2015?
In terms of competition, it is curious that DPR left out the Sony A99, which admittedly is an aging camera at this point, but still, to not even mention it is a significant omission. Roughly one stop poorer in ISO, not as good AF, probably not as good in several other ways, but great EVF (if you like shooting with those), full time live view, and a few other pluses. Curious that DPR doesn't even see it in the race so to speak. Hope they give more attention to the A99ii (out in 1st or 2nd Q of 2015?)
JeanPierre Thibaudeau: 1,000 posts!What do I win?lolGreetings to all!
You are today's BIG WINNER!!!
You get a free lifetime supply of crabby, whinny bloggers going 24/7, unlimited brand wars, and a few pithy comments.
Pritzl: I have looked really hard and I really cannot see the advantage for any of these cameras (maybe the NX-1, but a tiny one at that) at 12800 ISO. They all look to be about the same. If there is a difference, it's one that requires a loupe and someone far more nit-picky than me.
It doesn't matter much anyway, as they're all a smudgy mess at that ISO anyway.
With the new prime NR program in Optics Pro, 12800 is looking more and more usable, at least for some web printing and smaller print work. I just started using it, and it's making me rethink low light shooting.
Iloveaircraftnoise: I was mucking around with A77 at my local camera store....The EVF doesn't refresh quickly enough in certain situations..In late afternoon / dusk shooting I imagine it will be even worse..I also noticed that depending on how you roll your eye around the viewfinder the four corners tend to distort & get fuzzy... If Sony used their imagination & made the A77's with an OVF I would buy it straight away..... I imagine it would be much cheaper than the big two price gougers offerings....
Exactly . .
Peiasdf: Page 9, who is that new DPReview video girl in that fishmonger photo?
Also, lets have a 7D2, NX-1 and A77 II shootout. Winner gets the losers' battery.
You mean that only the first of those three choices is for people who REALLY know that they want: an overpriced and out of date camera body that can't shoot good video and that rests on the laurels of a brand name in decline??
I'm glad that Canon is checking the right boxes for you. And although it may seem that DPR is giving Canon the back of their hand, I think a silver award is fair, simply from the standpoint of the competition. Competition is actually tougher than your post would suggest, particularly the NX1 and the A 77ii. I was particularly stunned to see how soft the video was on the 7Dii, with all this time for Canon to tweak resolution and to implement some version of full frame sampling. Three years ago or even just two years ago this would be a gold award camera hands down. But the goalposts keep moving, and it isn't simply Canon's poor dynamic range performance, it's just that they have not improved as much as the competition has improved. There's still the great Canon ecosystem and lens groups – I think still their strongest draw. But compared to both the NX1 and the A 77ii, where that Canon ecosystem is clearly way stronger, the camera body is a disappointment, esp. for $1800.
MarshallG: DPReview, you keep saying that you rate cameras according to their "class," but you compared and rated the 7Dii against cameras that aren't in its class.
The fundamental reason for purchasing this camera is sports, action and wildlife photography. The Nikon D7100 is not in that class; it doesn't come close. Neither does the the Canon 6D or 5Diii. The cameras in the same class are the Nikon D4s and Canon 1Dx (neither of which have articulating touchscreens or WiFi either). And those two cameras cost more than 3x more than the 7Diii.
I also wonder whether you adequately assessed the comparative performance of the camera's LiveView autofocus. It does not matter how sharp the sensor is if the camera isn't focused on the subject. So is the video AF class-leading or not? I understand that this isn't the camera for landscape or street photographers. But if the subject is moving, this is the camera you want, and I do not think you compared or rated it accordingly.
MarshallG You completely left out the A77ii. Arguably, the 7100 isn't any kind of serious sports camera with its crippled buffer. I find it interesting that Canikon hegemony is simply assumed here, such that formidable competition from the likes of the NX1 and A77ii aren't even in the discussion. Blindspots like that should be embarrassing.
SulfurousBeast: Did I say this already...? Canon which had missed the boat 3 years ago had one good (and last may be...) to catch up, but stumbled woefully short on this one. I was patient for 5 years not making a jump however irrresitable it was becoming. Now it is all clear... Time to jump. Just an enthusiast but still with about $6k worth Canon gear....Craigslist is calling....to be honest, would have stayed if it had the D7100 sensor, video not crippled, rather one that takes advantage of the dual pixel AF and a touch screen. So close, but still Canon chose to play the dirty game with its APSC customers.
Understood. So just curious, which way will you go?
Douglas F Watt: Not so much as a token mention in the whole review of the Sony A77ii as serious competition?? For half the price . . . . Really??
Thanks Rishi once again for a thoughtful reply.
I will look forward to you guys having the time to really dig into the A77ii, hopefully with the new firmware, which really does improve AF function from my little bit of informal testing.
Not so much as a token mention in the whole review of the Sony A77ii as serious competition?? For half the price . . . . Really??
What?? No Sony A6000 in this group?? No A7ii/s/r? The Nikon 1 is totally out of its depth in this group . . . it's not even a fair comparison. But it does show what Nikon thinks of the whole mirrorless thing. . .
what's troubling here are the signs that DPR is simply in over their heads: a) have had to go to 'fluff' 1st impressions reviews for all kinds of stuff and the number of actual substantive reviews per month has really dropped off from the start of the year; b) not able to collect information competently (took JPEGS from this camera with NR turned off, didn't notice - until I pointed that out - same mistake made on the Sony RX1r too) and hasn't reshot the studio images for either Sony camera, leaving everyone wondering what's up; c) neglecting Sony out of a Canikon bias (doubtful given all the Gold Awards to Sony stuff over the last three years).
Bottom line - something is really amiss at DPR. Desperately short staffed? Overextended?
What is going on with DPR???????
mcolvin1: For $598, I could buy the Sony a5100, which from reviews I have read at other sites, is probably a better camera (APS-C sensor, 24 mp, touch screen, very fast auto focus, etc.) It is only slightly larger than the Canon G7 X (with the kit lens). Better lenses can be added later. DPR has yet to do its review. I am hoping that it will get a high rating. If so, that will be the one I will buy. Its image quality is supposed to be as good as the Sony a6000, which has excellent IQ. But it is small enough to fit in a fanny pack and carry all the time. After reading DPR's review of the G7 X, it is no longer on my list. Why pay more for it when it is probably not as good as the a5100?
Yup. Like I said, it's all about tradeoffs.
mpgxsvcd: I think Canon will see this as a good reason not to use other companies sensors. They will say that putting the Sony sensor in this camera was the reason it failed to produce the results they wanted.
Canon should just go back to their roots. Make a really good Rebel Camera with a Great new zoom lens. Make the lens fast with great AF for video but they need to figure out one way or another how to put a good sensor in it.
I don't care if they make it themselves or buy it from someone else. It needs to finally be as good or better than the competition. Then just advertise the heck out of it and they can get back on track.
the differences in their DxO scores are pretty modest, and don't translate into a meaningful difference in picture quality. Don't get too fixated on DxO numbers. It's just one set of metrics.
so don't buy the kit lens! It's all about tradeoffs. Either the RX100III (arguably better camera than the G7X) or the Canon will be way more compact than the A5100 with a lens on it, but both will not really compete with the 5100 in the pictures department (the RX100III will beat the 5100 in the video department)
monkeybrain: So the Samsung NX Mini's (also 1 inch sensor) sample's gallery was up and the camera on sale before the Canon was announced. But DPReview clearly prioritised the Canon review because it'll get more hits and have (presumably indefinitely) sidelined the Mini review despite the sample's gallery having some very promising shots.
Seems like a pretty fair review to me . . . but (and not to pile on :-)) I am surprised that you rated the screen and viewfinder experience on the G7X and the RX100III as the same?? Really? Was that a hiccup?
kevin_r: Somehow, I'm puzzled by the fact that we have studio images for the Canon 7D Mark II whilst there are still none for the sony A77 Mark II which has already been out in the market for months...... The Canon still has to appear on the shelves.Really strange, that.
yes, i am confident that there are probably some hardware restrictions that prevent the RX100III and even the A77II from doing 4K (and prevent the RX100 from doing it too). But I get the sense (just guessing on this) that Sony is late to the party on 4K. No on-camera record ability on the 4K on the A7s, and no seeming interest in this ability anywhere else. I think they have company on this sluggish/ambivalent embrace of 4K - (Nikon!), but the interest in 4K is about to explode as the sets enter the mainstream (we bought out first 4K set this summer and love it). If Samsung's new PHONE has 4k for Pete's sake, then flagship DSLRs (even APS-C ones) should have it. I think they are really underestimating how quickly interest in 4k will pick up. The new codec (forgotten its designation but the Nx1 has it) will really help by reducing the obscene file sizes. Sony will be caught with their pants down on this.
armandino: It strikes me how bad the Sony SLT-A77 II is in noise when compared to the peers.
Which images are you guys talking about? The JPEGs were removed (due to someone not paying attention and shooting the scenes with high ISO NR turned off!). The RAW images are all close, w/ the A77II and the 7D about the same at 6400, and the 7100 and 7DII both slightly (and I mean slightly) better. Curiously, if you look at DxO testing the three cameras in this class, the A77II at 12800 is less noisy than either the Canon or Nikon APS-C (7D DxO testing not available but 70D probably using the same sensor (http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-SLT-Alpha-77-II-versus-Canon-EOS-70D-versus-Nikon-D7100___953_895_865). There is really nothing separating the cameras that is truly meaningful in these metrics - people fixate on DxO numbers, but that is nothing but a slightly more sophisticated version of the megapixels wars. It's really whether you like shooting with the camera, its OS, and its support ecology that become the really important question. No the minutia.
Nice to see that Richard has a real sense of humor (he should express it more often):
"At which point you try to compensate for the excessive compensation you've applied and are reminded that the dial operates the opposite direction to every other camera you've ever used, meaning you have to compensate for your compensated compensation. Then the battery runs out, because it's too small."
In fact, I've had more chuckles reading this group of comments, and the review itself, than I've had on any photo blog in a while. Most of the time, it's a crabfest of trolling and grouchiness. This one was pretty good (although there is still no shortage of grumpy customers).