Maybe it was a marketing decision. Even back in the 90s I often met professionals in the prepress sector, who insisted uncompressed TIFFs would provide better quality than lossless compressed ones (LZW for instance). It was almost impossible to convince them because they mostly claimed to have heard it from some kind of a guru. I suppose that kind of myths still linger around and that might be a reason for Sony to decide not to give any reason to such ill-informed people to preserve their doubts.
Digimat: i guess you should not do this with an A7rII ;)
At least it has a magnetic IBIS (mechanically similar to what Pentax uses), which should not be prone to impact damage in contrast to older piezo-driven systems.
Ben O Connor: Back in the day; Nokia sealed a deal with Zeiss and it feels like "forever"! Even now Microsoft's windows phones comes with "Zeiss optics".
I think Sony is very jealous even angry about it!
I guess this makes not that much of a difference for the "smartphone generation". In the end image quality is just one of many factors when selecting a phone. Apple doesn't need any co-branding and they go even stronger with their iPhones, btw. with very capable camera modules. And IMO Sony is currently strongly promoting their "Xperia" brand so any co-brand would be unnecessarily confusing.
villagranvicent: The worst thing happen to Canon are the EF to E-Mount AF adapters... a sweet bridge between the past and the future. Maybe Canon could start making glass for E-mount (?)
Canon glass is mostly very good, some lenses are even excellent and the price to performance ratio is reasonable. Build quality of the L lenses is top-notch. But even as someone who prefers optical viewfinders, I see a huge issue with dynamic range and color differentiation in some critical hues with their sensors. Therefore my next camera body will most probably be the A7RII - yet I'll continue buying my glass from Canon for the time being. Once because I pay a lot less for practically equal optical performance, and secondly because I will continue using my Canon full-frame bodies. Probably the EF-to-E adapter will stay on the E-mount full-frame body most of the time.
mpgxsvcd: I am guessing that Canon probably won’t be touting their mirrorless interchangeable lens offerings like Sony is. They have all but abandoned mirrorless interchangeable lens. That is a shame. A mirrorless 7D MK III and a mirrorless 5DS would be very well received I predict.
They should first get their sensor technology sorted. I plan to purchase an A7 or A7r to use it primarily with my Canon lenses. There would no need to do so if Canon sensors performed equally well as the Sony ones.
rfsIII: Phil Askey almost always managed to gift us with a cat photo in his long-ago reviews, now we have Mr. Spencer with a magnificent dog photo. I hope this is a feature we will see more of.
Please bring back the cat. I prefer it to this breed of dogs.
Sony cameras and phones are top-notch. We're very happy with them. Regarding the phones at least as hardware is concerned. Since I primarily use Canon FF DSLRs and have Sony only in APS-C format so far, I sincerely hope Canon will improve their sensors - with or without the help of Sony or another company. Probably I'm gonna buy an A7 series body to bridge the gap as long as Canon lags behind.
Btw. does anyone know if the Toshiba manufactured sensors are licensed Sony designs?
Capture One is the natural successor to Aperture IMO. However, because I use a certain LR PlugIn, I've switched to LR about a year ago. However, the UI of LR is horrible all the way. Thus I'm considering moving to C1 even if this needs more manual work and maybe adding MediaPro.
Maeda-san, isn't he the man who recently claimed there' wasn't enough space on the 5DS / 5DSr for a headphone jack because the body shell was "recycled" from the 5D Mk. III (in my own words)?
So they introduce a new 50 MP camera for approx. 4000 $ and slightly modifying the magnesium casting tool to allow for a headphone jack is too expensive or what?
Also, "pixel-level quality" is mainly counted by colors and dynamic range. Let's see how the 5DS/5DSr performs in that respect. Otherwise, it might be time to ask Canon to fulfill Mr. Maeda's promise and install a Sony sensor.
Several clones surfaced and submerged over the years while Photoshop stayed on top all along. As of yet, the most successful challengers seem to be Pixelmator and The Gimp, each for different reasons.
I'm not convinced we need yet another contender.
If anything, a slimmed down program with hugely simplified interface might be more successful these days.
Aperture is still the application with the best UI for pro users to manage large image libraries. No tedious switching between modules, full flexibility in comparing images while adjusting them, complete keyboard shortcut customization ... I already switched to Lightroom because of its better sharpening, integrated distortion correction etc., but miss the Aperture UI each day.
Sorry to see that Apple has become a toy company. They care more about the iPhones in 13 years old teenagers' pockets than about their (former) loyal pro user base. I remember how the presentation at Photokina 2006 finally convinced me to use Aperture, it was completely targeted at pro and enthusiast photographers. But boy, did they spiral down since.
I don't understand the complaining about a lack of portrait primes in the review, because there's the amazing SEL 50mm f1.8 OSS which I love (!!) for its pleasant bokeh and great overall optical performance - plus stabilization. Not to mention the very reasonable price tag. The A6000 is an APS-C camera - no reason to ignore this one.
Somtimes I take my FE2 out of the cabinet just to turn the dials, try the switches and press the DOF lever while looking through this magnificent viewfinder with its analog needle metering indicator and mechanical mode thumb. Boy, do I wish to have this kind of immediate controls on a digital SLR.
And I don't even wish that to cost less than a present full frame DSLR. Not just the FM3a, but all of the FM/FE series, not even to mention the F3, weren't exactly cheap in their era either.
Is it possible with the D610 to adjust aperture during DOF preview/live view/video, as it is on the D800 but not on the D600?
It's called "Rafale", not "Rafael". Otherwise: Great shot!!
My children never wanted such silly looking stuff but preferred serious cameras like those daddy uses right from the start. Especially the boys always preferred those with many switches and metal body.
This interview reflects a very good approach towards their customers by Nikon, including respecting the wishes of owners of legacy lenses - talk of long-term commitment in opposite to ever-faster "innovation" cycles and planned obsolescence. Congratulations - in fact if I'd not be invested in a Canon full frame system already, I'd seriously consider returning to Nikon completely today (having been a Nikon user in the film era for some time, but I wasn't completely happy with their AF bodies and some of the lenses back then).
No word about when the picture was taken? Film was still supreme until just a few years ago. Anyway, an interesting "making-of" report.
Very useful article but I'd not share complaints about the MF/AF switch no longer having dedicated AF-S and AF-C positions, since the new concept with just AF/MF positions and a button at the center allows the AF mode to be stored in custom memory settings, something which was a small but serious shortcoming on previous Nikons IMO.
Btw. it would be nice if a set of deliberately under- and overexposed RAWs (esp. at low ISO) could be provided for being able to try out the sensor's capabilities regarding highlight recovery and shadow noise.
Seems a sensible move. I also appreciate backs and bodies being sold separately - and hopefully being upgradeable independently.