turvyT

turvyT

Joined on Mar 12, 2014

turvyT's recent activity

  • Commented on Nikon D750 Review preview

    If you read my previous posts with some attention, you'll see that I referred to DPreview LabTest results, saying is impressive how much better is IQ from 645z than from D750. I commented on these...

  • Commented on Nikon D750 Review preview

    No problem on gents getting whatever piece of equipment they want. Cameras choose their users. But still, IQ wise, MF is in another league, and 645z results can be seen in Lab test. Of course I...

  • Commented on Nikon D750 Review preview

    Whatever you want. I was clearly talking about IQ in my post, and 645z's IQ destroys D750 in that regard. Of course you can prefer a more portable, fast, and easier to use camera. Of course you...

  • Commented on Nikon D750 Review preview

    Whatever you want. I was clearly talking about IQ in my post, and 645z's IQ destroys D750 in that regard. Of course you can prefer a more portable, fast, and easier to use camera. Of course you...

  • Commented on Nikon D750 Review preview

    D750 looks wonderful until you compare it in lab test section with Pentax 645z. Then, image quality wise, D750 looks just like one more of the pack. I know that IQ only doesn't say much about...

  • The first guy sounds like someone who knows what he's talking about --regardless you agree or not. The second guy sounds like someone has never used a MF format before. What's the point of such a...

  • No mention to Leica M (240). Is it in any other class? Or it's out of Dpreview?

  • In pro photography you shoot whatever they pay you for. Dead, alive, still, semi, or guys walking leisurely on a beach. Nobody said otherwise. The sort of funny thing is to test a procamera...

  • Very nice and easy video to watch, but I can't help thinking and rethinking (with a smile) the fact that dpr, to judge the pro use of a camera, choose the following ordeals: 1. Shooting dead...

  • How weird to pass a judgment on a camera (more than one) they haven't tested.

  • Nope. This is a Pentax/Ricoh.

  • Ricoh/Pentax products consideration by dpreview: "There are more things in heaven and earth, dpreview, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

  • Nice stuff.

  • Always good to read your comments, Rishi. Sorry to say it, but about the only dpreview editor who seems to know what he does.

  • Most people whoe read this web use apsc, so apsc will win, Then, there it comes comes the second group of user, MFT, so MFT will take second place. Third, you have the one inch group, and fourth...

  • Why this camera or the Lumix DMC-GM5 (hands-on) are already included in the Reviews section, and the Pentax K-S1 is not? Leds were not on and DPR could not find it in this dark world? No wonder why...

  • Me too. But, to talk more about your anti-Pentax bias, why after two weeks, the Pentax K-S1 is not included in the list of preview/hands-on cameras?

  • Make it weatherproof. That's more than enough.

  • Please, don't feel like that. I like dpr work well, if not I would not follow you. I especially like the latest members arrived into your team, and their technical explanations and comments, but...

  • To be p:) Pentax K01 is indeed a great camera (except for the falling mode dial). But as someone said, dpr should stop commenting on or reviewing Pentax cameras. They seem to be beyond their...

Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 0
Threads started 0
Total comments 35
Total likes 99
Last post 6 days ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0