Technically this is a refraction, and also the objection being reflected is not supposed to appear in the image.
This is technically a refraction, not a reflection.
Looks pretty pristine to me. Not much decay.
Peters Dad: Beautiful green butterflies (moths?).
I think the emphasis with the OP is on "green". Not sure there is any yellow in there. Great image apart from that.
It's interesting that the Junior version will not shoot RAW and will have only auto-ISO. Why assume that somebody buying the more compact version doesn't want key features such as manual control and RAW?
And which buyer, who doesn't mind being stuck with JPEG and auto-ISO, will be happy to accept only manual focus? The sort of buyer who will accept a camera that can only auto-ISO will want AF.
There is no way known that this aircraft is a Grumman Prowler. Looks more like an F/A 18 Hornet. Did you actually take this photo?
The aircrew are not the main subject of this photo.
What are "end of the world colours"?
NilsBV: No part of this picture seems to be in focus. Maybe stop down the aperture a bit. With a 1/2000 shutter speed there is obviously enough light.
I think the voting proves my point.
How will that stir up the camera snobs, given what you took that picture with. Demonstrates that you don't need $5000 worth of DSLR gear to win a photo comp.
This might not have rated highly overall, but I love the strong colours of the red, yellow and green vehicles in an otherwise almost monochrome scene.
I think this one would work better if the building was more off-centre.
Shame that the stadium isn't lit up.
Shame about that twig in the foreground, right in front of the bird.
What a beautiful picture. Very worthy winner.
No part of this picture seems to be in focus. Maybe stop down the aperture a bit. With a 1/2000 shutter speed there is obviously enough light.
The whites are completely blown.
It shows that a garish filter can turn any image, even when shot with the most expensive gear, into crap.
Birddogman: Great photo! Really gives the uninitiated a feel for the power, drive and energy of a fit bird dog. GSP's are great dogs, too - would be my choice if I couldn't have Brittanys.
By his name ("Hunter" in German), do I correctly assume Jager is a working dog as well as a beloved pet? If so, I'd love to see some pics of Jager in action in the uplands. I tend to get vilified by some here when I post such photos of my dogs, but I post anyway.
Those pictures in your Flickr gallery are sensational. Inspiration to get some more good pictures of my GSP.
papa natas: Stop cross dressing a dog as if it were a Kangaroo!! Or is it the other way around?This one takes the cake!!Great caption!!Congrats to you both!!!Have a bone and give that dog a cigar!***Please, please, tell me this wasn't a selfie....***
Definitely agree on that description of a GSP. The best model dog a man can get. Great picture of one too, particularly given the speed at which they can move.