papillon_65

papillon_65

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Has a website at http://bit.ly/1K1oqkv
Joined on Oct 8, 2007

Comments

Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Alex Sarbu: DPReview, please remove those pictures; your gallery software is making them look much softer than they were on pentax.com.
This article became a Pentax-bashing fest because of it.

They're terrible in every respect.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2016 at 07:08 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Sarbu: DPReview, please remove those pictures; your gallery software is making them look much softer than they were on pentax.com.
This article became a Pentax-bashing fest because of it.

Seriously, I'd be disappointed if that came from my Smartphone lol, it's garbage, even at that tiny size.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 16:55 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Sarbu: DPReview, please remove those pictures; your gallery software is making them look much softer than they were on pentax.com.
This article became a Pentax-bashing fest because of it.

I refer you to my original comment, neither meet the definition of "sharp", one's just a bit less of a blurry mess than the other.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Sarbu: DPReview, please remove those pictures; your gallery software is making them look much softer than they were on pentax.com.
This article became a Pentax-bashing fest because of it.

I looked at the "originals" and they're the same size, and if you can't make pictures sharp at this size then there's something seriously wrong about them.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 15:54 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Sarbu: DPReview, please remove those pictures; your gallery software is making them look much softer than they were on pentax.com.
This article became a Pentax-bashing fest because of it.

Sharper as in taken with vaseline on the lens rather than through a coke bottle?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 15:15 UTC

Who made the lens? coke?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 15:09 UTC as 51st comment | 3 replies

Cool, looks like a very nice camera, I wonder how many suicides we'll see because a feature someone likes isn't present.....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 14:19 UTC as 132nd comment
In reply to:

endofoto: This year graphene sensor revolution will become a reality. Cell phone sensors will have more dynamic range than these expensive toy like old fashion cameras. These are the last cameras with this ridiculously high prices trying to fool the consumers. They dont want to accept the change in imaging technology.

You might be right in the long run, but there's absolutely no sign of graphene sensors appearing in any consumer camera any time soon, so it's a moot point until it does.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 13:15 UTC
In reply to:

endofoto: This year graphene sensor revolution will become a reality. Cell phone sensors will have more dynamic range than these expensive toy like old fashion cameras. These are the last cameras with this ridiculously high prices trying to fool the consumers. They dont want to accept the change in imaging technology.

Riiiight....those Graphene sensored smartphones are just flying off the shelves aren't they.....oh wait....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2016 at 20:55 UTC

Excellent, 600 quid for a firmware update, I'll take a dozen....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 18:34 UTC as 9th comment
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

It wasn't "invented", it evolved from many other languages.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 19:14 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

You tell me, you're the expert. I'm using real English, not the one where you made such life enhancing changes such as swapping the letter S for the letter Z and invented longer words such as "burglarized" to replace a shorter word that already existed, and made much more sense.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 17:37 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

Maybe you should trying learning it instead of typing rubbish, that would be a good start.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 17:29 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

I wasn't trying and the language is known as "English", though I'm guessing you're going to claim it was invented in America of course.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 17:18 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

Oh dear, mummy taken your sweeties or have your over-dosed on Rambo again?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 17:07 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

@Photography201 Thanks for proving my point ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 17:00 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography201: Does Dpreview make actual prints a hard copy. How can you evaluate any lens otherwise. Unless I missed it somewhere

You have Dpreview readers with iPads, iPhones or other devices and with different computer monitors all looking at the same thing.

You have other variables from what picture mode I think it's called is used neutral vivid portrait whatever. Then you have JPEG vs raw and if raw there are different raw developers and who knows who is working on those files.

If Nikon end users are buying this lens who knows the photo background of those individuals

Too many variables.

Don't shut the website down, where would I go for some comedy gold?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 16:52 UTC

Disappointing - if it was a constant F2 pancake style I'd be interested....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 16:50 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (733 comments in total)
In reply to:

papillon_65: That's lovely and all but you've still got to carry it...*yawn*....

Does any enthusiast actually "need" either of these two cameras? I don't think so, if they want one and can afford it that's entirely different. I don't drive a Porsche just in case I get chased by the Police and it would be pretty rubbish for carrying the shopping as well.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2016 at 09:55 UTC
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (733 comments in total)
In reply to:

papillon_65: That's lovely and all but you've still got to carry it...*yawn*....

Complete overkill unless you're shooting for a living but each to their own.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2016 at 05:47 UTC
Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »