jagge: Interesting comment Mannypr.... Like many others you just dont get it at all, and one has to wonder if you at all did read the article.
This is the take home message : Mirroless cams like the nex5n is every bit as good in IQ as any midrange DSLR, going up to prosumer DSLR. Nex 7 goes beoynd them in IQ. You are plain wrong if you asume that DSLR is always a step in front, now they are actually a step behind.
That is the facts, and the interesting part is that for a long time Nikon and Canon didnt get it either so you are excused. It seems Canon are slowly getting the message, Nikon not so much I think they will miss the train completely it seems they simply are not inovative enough as a company.
I swear, some people on this site write like they are lobbyists for camera companies marketing campaigns. To me, anyway, comparing mirror-less and dslr's is like comparing books to a kindle. If given a choice, I'd rather read a book, but I have and enjoy using my kindle as well (especially on long trips). They obviously have their merits, but in the end I prefer the "real thing", so to speak. It really depends on the situation. I don't think mirror-less will replace dslr's, too many people rely on that tactile sensation and interaction that a dslr affords. Also, to assume that EVF's will catch up to the complexity, resolution, and response time of (get this) a HUMAN EYE by the next generation, is completely absurd.
Direct link |
Posted on Dec 30, 2011 at 19:15:49 UTC
damienlee: Which one would be most suitable for HDR photography? I know that the Sony NEXs disqualify themselves given the lack of a proper autoexposure bracket. How about the other makes?
Ummm, do it manually...
Direct link |
Posted on Dec 30, 2011 at 18:43:11 UTC
jagge: Interesting comment Mannypr.... Like many others you just dont get it at all, and one has to wonder if you at all did read the article.
This is the take home message : Mirroless cams like the nex5n is every bit as good in IQ as any midrange DSLR, going up to prosumer DSLR. Nex 7 goes beoynd them in IQ. You are plain wrong if you asume that DSLR is always a step in front, now they are actually a step behind.
That is the facts, and the interesting part is that for a long time Nikon and Canon didnt get it either so you are excused. It seems Canon are slowly getting the message, Nikon not so much I think they will miss the train completely it seems they simply are not inovative enough as a company.
I swear, some people on this site write like they are lobbyists for camera companies marketing campaigns. To me, anyway, comparing mirror-less and dslr's is like comparing books to a kindle. If given a choice, I'd rather read a book, but I have and enjoy using my kindle as well (especially on long trips). They obviously have their merits, but in the end I prefer the "real thing", so to speak. It really depends on the situation. I don't think mirror-less will replace dslr's, too many people rely on that tactile sensation and interaction that a dslr affords. Also, to assume that EVF's will catch up to the complexity, resolution, and response time of (get this) a HUMAN EYE by the next generation, is completely absurd.
jmmgarza: My 8x10 Deardorff is mirrorless... they forgot to mention it.
I would love to have the NEX 7. Should I wait for the 8 or 9? Never had that problem with the ol' Deardorff. Hand holding a camera.... how novel!
Wow...I think most of the people here are pretty dense. Also, a dose of spell check every once in awhile would be a revelation!
damienlee: Which one would be most suitable for HDR photography? I know that the Sony NEXs disqualify themselves given the lack of a proper autoexposure bracket. How about the other makes?
Ummm, do it manually...
Where did you take this pictures? You are obviously in America, Colorado? Northern California?