MyLittleEye

MyLittleEye

Lives in United Kingdom TW9 3AE, United Kingdom
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.kew.org
Joined on Jul 13, 2010

Comments

Total: 1, showing: 1 – 1
On Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras article (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nick Carrigan: Sorry DPReview but you haven't convinced me to shoot in RAW.

You've claimed that shooting in JPEG is a terrible experience. Could it also be a fact that certain companies just have a poor JPEG engine design?

Olympus has created a truly excellent JPEG engine. It isn't just in the XZ-1 but also the E-P/E-PL series as well. Why can't other manufacturer's do this?

Most P&S cameras have awful JPEG engines that can't even compete with an Apple iPhone image. If Apple can make this work, then certainly a *camera* company should be able to -- (a leer towards Canon/Nikon.)

If everyone would invest the time to create a good JPEG engine then RAW mode really wouldn't be necessary for the average user. Sure, RAW has some advantages but it shouldn't be a requirement to justify the camera's IQ.

Personally, I find it sad when I read a review that says "well, the JPEG engine sucks but RAW is great. So, we'll give it a Gold award."

To my mind comparing Raw with JPEG equates to comparing Negative with Polaroid -
Lightroom has been the most rewarding investment I've made; simultaneously simplifying and accelerating my "workflow" managing my files, cataloging and, with .DNG, embedding descriptive metadata into the files themselves, applying image adjustments and embedding them non-destructively. If one's serious enough about photography to invest in a raw capable camara then I see little excuse for overlooking raw's (DNG's) numerous advantages.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2012 at 02:54 UTC
Total: 1, showing: 1 – 1