Michael Ma: That would be awesome. Barrel distortion correction for face is just ridiculously bad on some phones. It would be nice if Adobe did a lens profile on the popular smartphones such as galaxy note 3, note 2, s4, s3, etc. That and the extra bit depth would want to me me actually attempt some descent photography.
My expectations? I have none!It's a smartphone. It's made for phone calls and information over the Internet.It's nice that they can take quite usable pictures in good sunlight but people here sound like they were about to replace cameras. They aren't.
The Nokia samples are indeed terrible.My ancient point and shoot makes better pictures.
brecklundin: Given the way Google feels about Adobe...what are the odds they will even use DNG instead my cash is on a new "Google Standard" RAW....beta of course....screw Google. Once they were fine then they got stockholders and stopped being inventive and customer oriented.
Blah.Google is without any doubt still among the most innovative companies in the world.
You'll still be shooting with a ridiculously tiny sensor so you'll have some wonderfully noisy extra bit depth.
Goodmeme: I hope they provide option for Adobe raw which is already open-source AFAIK. Why reinvent the wheel, when a universal wheel has already been designed?
Yay! So finally, we can process those crappy pictures made with microscopically tiny sensors in RAW! Long overdue!I hope this doesn't break the overly abused retrovintagehipstercrapster filters.
Gosh, this is exciting!I hope it does have some craptastic Instahipsterjunkfilters built in, to make a useless product even more useless.
OneGuy: You label it a gopro killer based on company marketing release? You are not connecting with me and I'm not connecting with you
It's labeled "MAY BE a GoPro killer".
Vegasus: Dear Dpreview, When you say, complicated wifi setup, is that the same with dos 6D?
So... It indeed IS complicated for you, Henry?
photofan1986: "Score" "Dxo"' blah blah...I really wonder how many of you really compared the actual IQ instead of just relying on Dxo figures. I also wonder how we managed to go out and shoot before Dxo!
Dxo is simply benchmarking and measuring equipment.They don't need to be able to produce a good sensor, it's not their business.And yes, Dxo IS the authority in terms of benchmarking sensors and lenses.
Do I make purchasing decision based solely on their results?Of course not. Ergonomics are important to me. General image quality is, which includes a lot more than just the measurable resolution. But then again, I wouldn't buy a camera that scores a whole lot worse than its competitors either.
camerosity: The Nikon P7700 is much better, now the P7800 even better. Sorry Canon.
Unfortunately, Sony spanks them both.
mike kobal: great images! I shot a short video with the Sony RX100 the day after in NYChttps://vimeo.com/52568721
Dude! Woah! Great job and thanks a lot for sharing.
inevitable crafts studio: strangly overprocessed, i didnt noticed sandy or any other storm in the US, they dont really cover that on the news in europe. i guess its bad because of their wooden houses in the states.
from the photos it doesnt shock me, looks like some sort of highwater
Hu?Sandy was covered everywhere in Europe. In TV, radio, newspapers, online.I was in Austria, Germany and Hungary around the time Sandy hit the US and it was in the news everywhere.