Gosh, this is exciting!I hope it does have some craptastic Instahipsterjunkfilters built in, to make a useless product even more useless.
OneGuy: You label it a gopro killer based on company marketing release? You are not connecting with me and I'm not connecting with you
It's labeled "MAY BE a GoPro killer".
Vegasus: Dear Dpreview, When you say, complicated wifi setup, is that the same with dos 6D?
So... It indeed IS complicated for you, Henry?
photofan1986: "Score" "Dxo"' blah blah...I really wonder how many of you really compared the actual IQ instead of just relying on Dxo figures. I also wonder how we managed to go out and shoot before Dxo!
Dxo is simply benchmarking and measuring equipment.They don't need to be able to produce a good sensor, it's not their business.And yes, Dxo IS the authority in terms of benchmarking sensors and lenses.
Do I make purchasing decision based solely on their results?Of course not. Ergonomics are important to me. General image quality is, which includes a lot more than just the measurable resolution. But then again, I wouldn't buy a camera that scores a whole lot worse than its competitors either.
camerosity: The Nikon P7700 is much better, now the P7800 even better. Sorry Canon.
Unfortunately, Sony spanks them both.
mike kobal: great images! I shot a short video with the Sony RX100 the day after in NYChttps://vimeo.com/52568721
Dude! Woah! Great job and thanks a lot for sharing.
inevitable crafts studio: strangly overprocessed, i didnt noticed sandy or any other storm in the US, they dont really cover that on the news in europe. i guess its bad because of their wooden houses in the states.
from the photos it doesnt shock me, looks like some sort of highwater
Hu?Sandy was covered everywhere in Europe. In TV, radio, newspapers, online.I was in Austria, Germany and Hungary around the time Sandy hit the US and it was in the news everywhere.
peevee1: OK, I have finally finished through all 229 images. Are you kidding me? It is probably the best gallery of the decade. Sensationally good. What is better to document the decline of Europe?
I don't like HDR much, especially much HDR. But it is not about HDR or pixels - it is about the subjects, and they are sensational.
I partially agree. The actual images and even more the subject are amazing.But the result are completely overdone HDR pictures which, to me, fail to display any soul because they look so artificial.
That will definitely save the world!
I don't mind HDR when it's employed to cover more stops when that's really necessary. But these images here all look over-artsy in a forced way. It's totally overdone, unfortunately.
An amazingly interesting country.It's very high up on my list of places I have to visit.
Fixx: 3 is enough. Lightroom, Photomatix, Photoshop.
Photomatix?HDR is as dead as hipsterrific filters are.
Juan M Molina: Maybe doesn't fit the same class, but I should consider Pixlr Express as the best alternative for Android. It has a HUGE library of filters, canvas and effects, and also sports a very useful array of "more classic' editing options.
There is a simpler version called Pixlr-o-matic, that may better fit in your list.
Pixlr is nice although I prefer Snapseed over Pixlr.Especially in the non-hipster department where real basic editing takes place, it offers a lot more in my opinion.
Yet the actual point is the article's caption: It's about NEW apps.
This retrohipstercrap is really getting old.
CyberAngel: Details are amazing!You should sometimes - only once - do this with a DSLR like Nikon D800 and oversharpen, make it a little warmer and oversaturate slightlyTHENclaim it came from the Lumia 1020and reveal the truth after all the haters and "Pro" have given their superior opinions. I would do it for the fun to see what happens afterwards.Caveat: those who realize the truth might reveal the gig too early...
You can tell how well the details are from a sample downsized to 467x701 pixels?Good work, you must be a pro!
JadedGamer: Unless you ask a cook what stove was used to prepare your meal, you should not ask a photographer what camera was used to take a picture. It diminishes the role of the craftsman.
Well, unfortunately, they suck. And they were made with a phone.
So those pictures suck and they were all hipstaraped to death.If that's what they wanted to prove, they succeeded.
Duppypog9: What a great example of "it's the photographer, not the equipment that make a great image".
I agree with the other comment. He was in one of the most mesmerizing surroundings. Even Polaroids shot there would be beautiful.
ashnikonian: "You have to draw the line somewhere. You don't have to own a Nikon D800 and 17-55mm f/2.8..."
Why would you use a DX lens on an FX body?
A camera is a tool, different tools for different jobs, surely?
"Why would you use a DX lens on an FX body?"
Because... Vignetting! That makes some really wonderful vignetting, dude!;)
Design by Jony Ive usually means that Dieter Rams has introduced pretty much the same design half a century ago. Ive is a thief.