xiod_crlx

p.s. a lot of people expected nikon to put 1-series sensor into P7000\P7100 successor - but nikon brought 1.7" instead... so the struggle continues =)

p.p.s. I would rather have P7700\G15 ~alike...

Good comparison!

Still, the outcome is a bit strange

P7700 MAKES BETTER PICTURES , but because G15 is faster and has better body design - it receives gold ??? Does it matter that raw file is...

Re: bobbarber

I have 40++ yrs old lenses, pre-AI nikons and others
They are great, some of them have such a smooth mechanics with 270º focus ring - it is a real pleasure to work with them

still...

Re: Plastek

yes old man, welcome to modern world of disposable items

one of the last lenses I've bought was 50\1.4 sigma - it is made of plastic, no surprises here

would it be sharper, better...

nikon one has a crop factor of 2.7x which allows to make a smaller lenses to build properly compact system.... oh no... it doesn't work... =)

why you need all metal lens? still dreaming about "old good times?"

plastic lens body is a good combination of price-weight-strength

what you will pay ($900) is the sense of "exclusivity" for a...

relative aperture 1.2 will gather light better that 3.2 (almost 3 stops of advantage)

but it is a bottle neck for small sensor system to have a decent background blur \ small DOF

want a proper...

it will blur background as full frame 85\3.5 lens or 50\1.8 @ aps-c

it is the only way for small sensor to blur background is to have large geometry aperture for short-focus lens

it is not a...

there is a suspicion it wouldn't perform better that 50\1.8G or 35\1.8G @ APS-C (because they are already excellent performers and there is not much place to go further)

bowers 85\1.4 are way more...

$900?

a bit crazy for FF 85\3.2 equivalent

nikon would sell 10x time more lenses such as 32\1.2 if the price would be just three times less (imho)

$600 for this?

right now G15 and P7700 cost $200 less without side effects like

- size is too big
- lack of proper support from third party raw converters

but there is a definite segment of...

why you need to have it in a mirrorless in a first place?
yes, to put fast prime and get proper field of view and geometrical aperture
e.g. even cheapest FF 50\1.8 will become a fast nice wide...

Low DR, lack of Flash, really outdated AF system, no second card option, impossible to use EF-S for upgrading users (e.g. no "cropped mode") - nice move Canon!

D600 with the same price has...

awesome!

next step - use FF lenses on Cropped sensors with the same resulting image!

looking forward to see it!

FZ200 has typical small sensor ultra-zoom picture (e.g. rubbish, just for people buying this mega-ultra-10000x-zooms) .

It is not clear why it is in the list but no *Nikon P7700* or *Samsung EX2*...

2Amandy

Blur channel usually multiplied by larger factor then others. But first of all we need to decide - do we want to keep noise levels as low as possible or to have more pleasant WB? Answering...

2Amandy

Blue channel usually multiplied by larger factor then others. But first of all we need to decide - do we want to keep noise levels as low as possible or to have more pleasant WB? Answering...

2Amandy

Blue channel usually multiplied by larger factor then others. But first of all we need to decide - do we want to keep noise levels as low as possible or to have more pleasant WB? Answering...

2Amandy

Blue channel usually multiplied by larger factor then others. But first of all we need to decide - do we want to keep noise levels as low as possible or to have more pleasant WB? Answering...

2Amandy

Blue channel usually multiplied by larger factor then others. But first of all we need to decide - do we want to keep noise levels as low as possible or to have more pleasant WB? Answering...