dstarr3

Joined on Mar 23, 2012

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (710 comments in total)

I'm all for minimalist design, the whole "less is more" thing. But, looking at the top of the camera in Photo 3, that kind of less is not more, I think that less is just less.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 16:53 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue (378 comments in total)

Good guy Leica.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 05:39 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Nikon Df Review (1628 comments in total)

$2,800 camera, $2 shutter release. A bargain!

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 16:19 UTC as 261st comment

While I'm not yet in the market for one yet, I'm very, very happy to see that camera manufacturers are jumping on the bandwagon of putting bigger sensors in smaller cameras. This can only lead to good things.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2013 at 03:06 UTC as 15th comment
On article Lexar promises XQD cards later in 2012 (38 comments in total)

I'd love to have been a fly on the wall at the meeting where Nikon got on the floor and begged Lexar to help them get the ball rolling on this XQD thing.

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2012 at 19:08 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Lexar promises XQD cards later in 2012 (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

makeitworst: Where the hell are the XD Cards!!??? I have Olympus cameras, GREAT Cameras, that are now media card Orphans because these jerk Flash Card makers adopt and DUMP formats at their whims! The largest XD cards that were ever made were 2GB! And those are nearly impossible to find! Even CF cards are becoming too expensive and hard to find (for older DSLRs like the early Nikon's before the switch to SD)!! There was nothing wrong with CF, considering the size they could have made 128 or 256GB cards by now!

This is BS!

I know I can't find cheap CF cards anywhere. Excluding every place I've ever thought to look.

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2012 at 19:05 UTC

A full-frame 40mm f/2.8 pancake lens for $200?

This means that Canon DID read all my letters I sent them!

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2012 at 05:02 UTC as 72nd comment | 3 replies

For horizontal and square photos, it's quite nice. Vertical photos, not so hot. But so be it. They're finally trying. This only bodes well.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2012 at 23:34 UTC as 15th comment
On article Sony announces NEX-FS700 '4k-ready' E-mount camcorder (237 comments in total)

I know it's irrelevant, but... Egads. What a minger.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2012 at 01:29 UTC as 34th comment
On article Photoshop CS6 Blur Gallery Tutorial (163 comments in total)

Can you adjust how many "blades" the simulated bokeh has? There are precious few lenses that produce genuinely round "orbs." Not to mention, the shape squashes a bit by the further from the center of the frame they are.

I'd still rather spend the cash on a fast prime and an ND filter. Better to create than to edit.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 18:39 UTC as 54th comment | 2 replies
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10