Bob Topp

Bob Topp

Lives in United States Huntsville, United States
Works as a EE
Has a website at http://fotki.com/HBN-Photos
Joined on Nov 19, 2001
About me:

Slowly migrating from D300/D700 to m4/3...

Comments

Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
On 20140102-_m5b8792 in the Downtown Outdoors challenge (9 comments in total)

Congratulations

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 18:28 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Hugo808: Wow, I'd have thought the opposite would be the case with all the great cameras on the market!

We'd better get out there and spend some cash if we want to see an XT-2 or a D400. No point just talking about them.....

We were ready to spend money on a D400 years ago. Some of us have drifted off to M4/3 and Fuji, who knows where? But once those F-mount lenses get sold, there will be no returning. ...nor is the money really there any more.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 21:57 UTC
On Epic fail? 70-200s of all makes among least reliable lenses news story (151 comments in total)

I have a Sigma 70-200/2.8 and 1.4 TC, pre-stabilization era. For sports, the lens was used mostly on a monopod for several years. First the TC got a bit loose (floppy). When it would not autofocus reliably, I set the TC aside and continued to use the lens until it, too, became loose. Being on a limited budget, I decided tofix it the best I could. Presently a few wraps of electrical tape hold the main body together well, and ample superglue fixed the TC. The tape is just enough nuisance to keep me from using the tripod clamp though.

I'm pretty sure my habit of leaning on the lens while using the monopod caused the problem in the first place. Now that I hold it, it works fine and shows no more problems. I still think of the lens as pretty much bullet-proof, and it has really strengthened my right-hand grip! In the long run, I'm sure the mass of these lenses is the primary wear factor- and I wouldn't want the added complexity of internal stabilization, at least for my use.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 15:29 UTC as 50th comment
In reply to:

jdhill66: Another situation where this technique is helpful is casual flash photography where near portions are too hot and far portions are too dark.

Not so, Abe,

The article might make me consider buying some extra software, but in fact, it pointed out things about software I already own that I have not taken advantage of. I appreciated the issues addressed by the author, even if this overall topic has to come up pretty often. It always helps to see alternate solutions compared side by side (and without my having to buy the software up front).

Thanks for the effort, Ellen.

BT

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2011 at 20:03 UTC
In reply to:

feinschmecker: Is this the conclusion: "Buy this book on Amazon.com"?!?

@ Mr. Diallo,

What happened to, "The customer is always right?" Yes, we understand that reviews take a long time to do thoroughly, but the fact is that the feature articles, in particular, have grown increasingly fluffy. The recent article on shooting at the beach was just such a fluff piece, and DPReview of ten years ago would not have published many, if any, of those shots unless to use them as examples of what not to do. I will always be an amateur, but I have grown from the comments of the many capable and generally competent participants on this site in the past. I would certainly like to see it remain top notch.

BT

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2011 at 19:18 UTC
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5