Rob Bernhard

Rob Bernhard

Lives in United States IL, United States
Joined on Jul 8, 2002

Comments

Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Motorola Moto X (2014) camera review post (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

photospots: I see one major issue with the Motorola X 2014 (http://www.gadgetindex.info/MotorolaAS/Motorola-X-14.html) as a camera phone and that is the lack of MicroSD card. This a major issue if you just shoot a good deal of pictures and videos. Then you would have to sync them elsewhere pretty often as 16/32 GB storage is quickly used by a little bit of pictures, videos and what you have of apps on the phone.

it's /not/ the only phone with this limitation, but we all know what you meant. :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 15:32 UTC
In reply to:

Ozyxy: where's support for my 60D and 5D Classic and SX50?

Canon is not really interested in consumers who do not buy a new camera body every 18 months. Anyone, like you or I, who dare use a camera longer than that is dead to them.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 02:57 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 First Impressions Review preview (296 comments in total)

I wish there was a Live-Tweet session of this Review In Progress
"Allison is switching to P mode now." "She's writing a note." "Ok, there goes the shutter and...it's a photograph!!"

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2014 at 16:11 UTC as 26th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)
In reply to:

WACONimages: 1502 posts... about this camera. That must be kind of a record this year...

It is not a record. It's just that now they are not splitting the comments across 4 or 5 different posts.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 01:40 UTC
In reply to:

sebastian huvenaars: Darker then a black steer's tookus on a moonless prairie night...

Drifting along like a tumbling tumbleweed.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 10:29 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)
In reply to:

Josh152: LOL Canon is talking about the impossible and DPR is hoping for a wifi printer.

I think your responses here are indication of a great need on your part.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 15:45 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)
In reply to:

Josh152: LOL Canon is talking about the impossible and DPR is hoping for a wifi printer.

[[ DPR is hoping for a wifi printer.]]

You need a history lesson and a two detailed lessons on understanding humor.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 03:36 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: I would like to see APS-C cameras to disappear. During the film era, we only had 35mm SLR and point-n-shoot for most people. The APS-C breed was introduced at a time when chips were still quite expensive/lack of technology for FF DSLR. Today, FF DSLR starts at around $1600 price range while APS-C are around $1000 - $1700, which is ridiculous. The existence of APS-C somehow made the FF (old 35mm equil.) into a higher class. I don't think it will cost that much to produce FF compared to APS-C. It's just an opportunity for camera manufacturers to make more money. Point-n-shoot has it's place because they are compact and good for traveling while the APS-C are about the same size as FF DSLR; APS-C also lacks shallow DOF; not a desirable option for isolating your subject....

[[The whole point of sharing my experience is that I wanted to inform people who still believe in this myth that APS-C is just as good as FF is false....]]

Your ability to communicate this is, sadly, quite lacking. Go back and read what you actually wrote.

Also, your latest statement is completely false. In many, many, situations, crop-sensor cameras are just as good as full frame. In some situations full frame has the advantage.

Your over-generalized comments do nothing to bolster your argument.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 01:26 UTC
In reply to:

Rob Bernhard: The premise that niche markets benefit all photographers rings hollow. Niche markets benefit well-heeled photographers. Woe is you if you are a photographer on a budget.

[[But my entire post was about new technology moving to lower tiers.]]

What current in-production cameras that cost $300-400 have seen benefits from the move by manufacturers to sell more expensive cameras with large sensors?

1 camera in the entire article, the one using a 1/1.7" sensor costs $350. The same 1/1.7" sensor the article points out is a dinosaur and is going away.

The very last sentence of the article states: "...photographers willing to spend money on a compact..." Spend money does not mean "not spend money" or "have a limited budget" it means SPEND MONEY.

Camera companies have responded to the loss of the point and shoot market by making more expensive cameras and selling them to fewer people. That does not benefit everyone.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 18:18 UTC
In reply to:

Rob Bernhard: The premise that niche markets benefit all photographers rings hollow. Niche markets benefit well-heeled photographers. Woe is you if you are a photographer on a budget.

[[ at under $300-$400 the enthusiast compacts that both I and the DPReview article mentioned are far below the price point of a comparably equipped DSLR ]]

Mentioned cameras:
LX3 - Out of Production
X10 - Out of Production
XZ-1 - Out of Production
Canon S Series - S95/S100 - Out of Production
RX100 (Original) - $500
R1 - Out of Production
DP1 - Out of Production
Coolpix A - $1100
GR - $700
RX1 - $2800
X100 - Out of Production
X100S - $1300
G7X - $700
LX100 - $900
G1X II - $750
LX7 - $350
RX100 III - $800
RX100 II - $650
X30 - $600

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 18:17 UTC
In reply to:

Rob Bernhard: The premise that niche markets benefit all photographers rings hollow. Niche markets benefit well-heeled photographers. Woe is you if you are a photographer on a budget.

[[I believe the reality is the opposite of what you have said.]]

I never said anything about image quality. It is good of you to invent something to argue against though. Quality photography has been done with far less technology than is available today.

I am talking about the bottom line. Real money. The quality cameras on the lower end f the market are going away. This is not good for consumers who enjoy photography on a budget and who benefited, over time, from new technology moving into the lower tiers.

There are no enthusiastic compacts that are available at a "far lower price point" than a DSLR.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 13:50 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: I would like to see APS-C cameras to disappear. During the film era, we only had 35mm SLR and point-n-shoot for most people. The APS-C breed was introduced at a time when chips were still quite expensive/lack of technology for FF DSLR. Today, FF DSLR starts at around $1600 price range while APS-C are around $1000 - $1700, which is ridiculous. The existence of APS-C somehow made the FF (old 35mm equil.) into a higher class. I don't think it will cost that much to produce FF compared to APS-C. It's just an opportunity for camera manufacturers to make more money. Point-n-shoot has it's place because they are compact and good for traveling while the APS-C are about the same size as FF DSLR; APS-C also lacks shallow DOF; not a desirable option for isolating your subject....

[[APS-C also lacks shallow DOF]]

That statement is complete nonsense.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 05:17 UTC

The premise that niche markets benefit all photographers rings hollow. Niche markets benefit well-heeled photographers. Woe is you if you are a photographer on a budget.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 05:06 UTC as 73rd comment | 6 replies
On Sigma announces dp1 Quattro article (200 comments in total)

With the "Quattro" name, they should not stop with only 3 cameras. ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 20:07 UTC as 71st comment | 5 replies
On Portfolio: Martin Kimbell's 'Light Paintings' article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sal18: Where's the interview??

@fuego6
Are you blaming me for the content?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 13:32 UTC
On Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review preview (494 comments in total)
In reply to:

orion1983: Looks as if SELFIE-features are most important nowadays...apart from all other technicals. Ridiculous trend.....they should stick with their cell phone to make precious selfies which the world is waiting for!

[[Looks as if SELFIE-features are most important nowadays.]]

But if the selfies-crowd drives sales, isn't that a good thing for Olympus and, as a result, current Olympus owners?

I never understand why people have a problem with camera companies trying to attract new customers. Just because you don't use a feature/function doesn't mean you are suddenly forced to by the release of this one camera.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 15:17 UTC
On Portfolio: Martin Kimbell's 'Light Paintings' article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sal18: Where's the interview??

@Sal18: Click through the photos. The text under each is the interview.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2014 at 18:22 UTC
In reply to:

JDThomas: Oh, the Leica haters are out again. Leica cameras are ALWAYS going to be expensive. Why are you surprised? Get over it.

This is the same thing they did with the M9. They put out an M9-P and it cost $1000 more. Even used they are going for about $1000 more than a regular M9. This M-P isn't a shocking release. I was actually wondering what took them so long to release it.

If you want a cheap (but fake) rangefinder go buy a Fuji. If you want a real rangefinder save up and buy a Leica.

[[The ironic thing is I'm not complaining about the Leica haters.]]

This is, of course, a complete lie. Also, you don't understand what the word irony means.

[[But I guess considering that most people that are complaining on camera forums are below average intelligence I shouldn't be surprised.]]

As you are complaining on a camera forum, I find your response delightful. Thank you.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 00:20 UTC
In reply to:

JDThomas: Oh, the Leica haters are out again. Leica cameras are ALWAYS going to be expensive. Why are you surprised? Get over it.

This is the same thing they did with the M9. They put out an M9-P and it cost $1000 more. Even used they are going for about $1000 more than a regular M9. This M-P isn't a shocking release. I was actually wondering what took them so long to release it.

If you want a cheap (but fake) rangefinder go buy a Fuji. If you want a real rangefinder save up and buy a Leica.

Couldn't you follow your own advice and get over the existence of the Leica "haters" as you call them? There are always going to be people who find Leica's premium pricing absurd. Why are you surprised by this?

Kettle called and left a message. Something about color swatches...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 19:39 UTC
In reply to:

Bokeh Monk: As a Canadian, I find this offensive! I would have thought that the RCMP would have set up a sting operation or something… but now that the the Federal Gov. has told all these Canada Post workers their all out of a job, it's almost what you'd expect to see, workers 'saving for their retirement!

[[edit: duplicate]]

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2014 at 01:34 UTC
Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »