BadScience: not really useful for landscapes which would most benefit from higher resolution; but are taken with long exposures.
As oldfogey rightly says, not only does the camera need to be rock steady (not a problem) the subjet does to - and that is a big problem.
Cant see this being a good idea.
I don't see how adding this feature to a camera is a bad idea. Plenty of objects out there that don't move.
HowaboutRAW: did #1 really have to be cliché softcore?
HowaboutRAW: Her breasts are starting to break free from her clothes? Maybe in your own imagination.Just because someone's face expresses, or looks like it's expressing some form of passion, it doesn't suggest sexual arousal. That is an assumption, and one that could get you into trouble.
Bordering on porn? How? Are you seeing something I'm not? I see a woman wearing a big hat. Are those hats being used for porn now? lol
The only thing I find pathetic about dpreview reporting a rumor, is people complaining about it.
justmeMN: Technical merit aside, in the US, Samsung has a brand problem. $2,799.00 for an off-brand camera? Good luck with that.
Because professionals only shoot a particular brand? lol
nunatak: also ... toiletry bags, pencil, or sunglass cases found at Kohls, TJ Max, Big Lots, Goodwill — offer other stealthy ways to carry small mirrorless systems, w/o tipping people off that you're just another photographer packing uppity Think Tank* gear. JMO.
*from someone who owns his fair share of uppity Think Tank gear. :)
I have to agree. They looking nothing alike, and any thief, scammer or con will see a camera pack coming from a mile away.
I like most of these and I really like the idea of the Readers Showcase. Congrats to those who made it to the top 15.
Awesome buck, and awesome shot!
Beautiful shot! The colors really stand out and nice composition. Congrats.