GM1 really produce some nice photoquality and details, even better than E-M1 at ISO 100/125
Wow! Details and colors are awesome, and thees are only Jpegs.. Looking forward to RAW.
rusticus: I am amazed at> 1000 comments - it is an upgrade of the M-5, nothing else -and the image quality of the E-M5 is equal
The image quality is better than the M-5. Have a look at the RAW-comparison.
pdqgp: I suppose DPR is appeasing sponsors and vendors of all types but a $20k lens as news article on a site like this? Maybe I'm the minority but I can't see the target audience being very wide here. It's like all the car magazines writing up reviews on cars that are $100k+ Interesting reads but the value to the masses is nothing more than entertainment. Must be a slow news day as they say.
IMO I'd much rather hear about gear the masses will use and is a better fit for the majority. Someone buying a $20k lens is not likely the average DPR reader.
Then dont read about it
ImagesInstyle: is this photoshopped? i thought this section was about, pure photography, and not computer altered images?
Of course it is photoshopped. The rule says:"The goal of this contest is to produce an amazing image using ANY Tools necessary [..] Create an image that takes real photographic material and turns it into something spectacular and fantastical!"
Great review! Thanks
Great!And thanks for the best photosite on the web.
umstbkddng: Lots of 12-year-old sore losers here, I see. Just because you don't have enough friends who give a crap about your hobby to support you, there's no need to hate on those who do.
While I normally prefer to appreciate the heart and artistic effort of everyone who contributes to this site and its challenges, I will note that none of the super-loud whiners in these comments had much to say before this last week, and none of their challenge submissions will ever exactly make it into National Geographic.
Goami, this is a nice photo, and I congratulate you. Enjoy the prize.
Nice photo, Yes, but did it deserver to win, No.Anyway.., because of this contest dpreview will now change their rules.
Chris Tofalos: Pity about no tilt/swivel LCD but very impressive, nonetheless.
What the PEN 3s should have been...
yes, I use the tilt LCD all the time
Hooman Khosravi: nice shot
Great! Really nice article
ProDesignTools: The KEY point not to forget is that the most impressive examples - the first two images - were restored after actual camera shake.
Everything else seems tangential to the takeaway.
How do you know there where actual camera shake..? How can we be certain?
acdsee doesnt work with rw2 (panasonic raw-files)
This is great! Would love it to be implemented in PS. Speed vs size is very important