kadardr: Where is the NX1 review? This one is simply insignificant. And you say you are unbiased?
same here,my implication was that,oftentimes cameras deserving a timely review do not get reviewed but cameras not so significant get attention.We are not saying NX1 per se did not get reviewd,we are saying similar ones which are significant and groundbreaking get ignored and justifications for such instances are not convincing enough.
K3 is going to haunt dpr for all times to come.
dpr has the knack of ignoring significant/groundbreaking cameras like NX1 and such others while noticing the insignificant ones.
joyclick: a lot of folks seen to have been swept off their feet by this Sony.Wait untill excruciating flaws and qirks surface,I mean real dealbrakers.
You are free to hold your opinion,it bothers me in the least.
a lot of folks seen to have been swept off their feet by this Sony.Wait untill excruciating flaws and qirks surface,I mean real dealbrakers.
Sony getting somewhere at last.Hope they stay on a definite course and take things to their logical conclusion.Hope a lot of us buyers are not their guinea pigs for beta testing their flawed cameras,paying through our noses.
I am still hesitant to commit to any Sony system
No company should be allowed to rule the market for too long.Sometimes consumers cut it down to size and sometimes companies commit suicide.
bobus: Those prices can't be right? ¥15,000 is only $120.
fmian: When shooting through a window, you could just use a flexible hood/bellows pressed up against the glass so light from around the room doesn't enter the shot. This product already exists..When shooting through a wire fence, you could just place the lens right up to the fence so that you're shooting through it, or you should use shallower dof which would make the fence in the foreground almost invisible..Complex software/computational solutions when simple practical solutions already exist.
What you suggest is valid and agreeable.However there are situations where this is not feasible/practcal.The new idea could be useful.
If only Sony thought like Oly and Fuji we could have some really good cameras and lenses
How does it stack up against Panasonic LX100?
Sony does not know what it actually wants.It is like a teenager full of energy and no definite aim.
is the 200-500mm Nikon's answer to The Tamron and Sigma 150-600mm?
It can use teleconverters and can go upto 1500mm on APSC what effective aperture will be available at this extreme zoom and will IQ be acceptable enough?
joyclick: Why let Adobe enslave you,tether you,make you do everything at their bidding without you having any say/choice in the matter?Boycott adobe,support other companies so that adobe is sent to oblivion.
O lord Adobe,have mercy on us poor souls,where would we be without you.We shall happily pay the ransome you demand,but please let us have whatever you dole out to us.
Why let Adobe enslave you,tether you,make you do everything at their bidding without you having any say/choice in the matter?Boycott adobe,support other companies so that adobe is sent to oblivion.
Why let Adobe enslave you and tether you and make you do everything at their bidding,without you having any say/choice in the matters?
Canon sure know very well how to screw money out of your wallets
Disappointing.Lives upto "kit" reputation.Expensive.No comparison in its class has been done.But, will sell by tons.