Why Nikon does not address the poor buffer issues across their entire line up?
when will it become everyone's staple if it will?
dpr is to be appreciated for being matter of fact and not be swept away by 7DII as many folks seem to have been.
dpr you have managed to cut the Canon to its proper size.
600D and 5200/3300 are all good.
nowo1978: This is a joke, right? The honorable mention goes to the Sony camera you haven't even finished testing and not the Pentax K-3?
DPR has always seen K3 as an ugly duckling ?
God save him from corporations.
will dpr ever review any of the Kodacks?
We have lost at least half a dozen camera makers from the film era.We all have to depend on those many less players.We are at the mercy of the remaining few in terms of prices and features and build quality.Likes of Cosina that made cameras for the big names doesn't exist for DSLRs.With over two decades of digital photography we still have to hanker for a well rounded,solid,durable and satisfying DSLR which anybody and everybody could own.In film days a point and shoot film camera owener,a basic SLR owener all shot FF and more on equal footing than today.
Is the D7100 stabilized in the body like the D7000?
joyclick: how many do 10FPS,how often?would 3-6FPS not suffice.how many do pure birding/fast action how often?
would K3/D7100 deliver similar results @ 1100$ body only as opposed to 1800$ body only 7D MK II
by cost I mean value and IQ benefit per $
Does the Nikon D750 makes more sense?
question is -do 'many situations' justify $1800 body only?
how many do 10FPS,how often?would 3-6FPS not suffice.how many do pure birding/fast action how often?
Why 12.8MP sensor and not 16MP? and why low ISO starting at 200?is Panasonic testing waters?
gbvalli: It is not "The Essence of Photography": only "The Essence of Luxury", and, to me, fairly aimless .
yet another pretext to screw out a mindless amount of money out of equally mindless folk's pockets
Composition is a 'gestalt' and any critiqe is an afterthought.We humans have become too cerebral and analytical.
Tony Ellis: Finally a decent counter to the RX100 III - evf or 100mm - hmmm - but why oh why does the canon have to be so basta*d ugly!
Have Canon lost the sense of "aesthetically pleasing looks" on their cameras? even their oldies AE-1,AE-1 P and F1 film cameras look sexier even today.
Does it maul the 7D MK II at its game?
How would this compare with an APSC/entry level FF paired with 16-85 size/IQ wise
when all the fever and frenzy and euohoria over cannikon subsides Oly might yet hit the market with something that goes much beyond EM-1.