JonSr

Joined on Jul 7, 2011

Comments

Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article AP cuts ties with Pulitzer-winning photographer (166 comments in total)

No Photo is to be trusted. #fu photojournalists. Manipulators.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 18:41 UTC as 38th comment

I don't trust photo. '.' Good Job. U earned it.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2013 at 03:51 UTC as 16th comment
On article Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review (175 comments in total)

if it used APS-C/43 sensor, it would have been just about perfect camera for me.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2013 at 00:43 UTC as 75th comment | 2 replies

i can't wait to hear what people do with that. New Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG with metabone.. yeah.. can't wait to put it on my GF2.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2013 at 04:43 UTC as 57th comment
On Challenge:7718 (2 comments in total)

WTH.. it is an arts contest, not a photo contest.

Posted on Jan 6, 2013 at 22:59 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply

Damn American Journalism to lead the charge in fakery in public images. OJ Simpson photo was my eye opener and then on I realize that ALL photos are touched. Therefore ALL FAKE. Current acceptance of HDR is totally inexcusable, too. Damn the industry and all its contributors in making photo worth a toiler paper. I trust 4chan photo far more than anything on the mass media. Shame on us.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2012 at 12:04 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonSr: D5100 was a D7000 with a few flaw. D5200 sounds like D3200 with a new number. Doesn't sound like an upgrade but a downgrade. That's sad.

you guys are very naive. dxomark does not indicate 3200 sensor is any better than one in 7000 which 5100 had. D3200 has lower Dynamic Range and lower Low Light sensitivity. I don't think there was much problem with focusing system. And I can't careless for gains in megapixel.

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2012 at 08:14 UTC
On article Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi (392 comments in total)

D5100 was a D7000 with a few flaw. D5200 sounds like D3200 with a new number. Doesn't sound like an upgrade but a downgrade. That's sad.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 05:04 UTC as 123rd comment | 5 replies
On article Hands-on with Nikon V2 (455 comments in total)

why make a toy camera look so serious. put a hello kitty outfit. neutered loser of a product that should shame any nikon badge owner.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 23:01 UTC as 139th comment | 2 replies
On article Accessory Review: Manfrotto Solo VI DSLR Holster Bag (96 comments in total)

if u r 2 satisfy my addiction, u gotta increase content output at least 2 fold. pump out stuff faster.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2012 at 19:06 UTC as 27th comment
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G15 preview (81 comments in total)

When GF3 is being sold for $300. What Canon and Nikon is doing with their tiny sensor compact seems price gouging naive people.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 02:16 UTC as 11th comment
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G15 preview (81 comments in total)
In reply to:

tutek: See the G7 in 2006. year. What has changed in 6 years? Almost nothing!

@calmwaters don't we know now that 1/1.7" sensor size is what really matter as far as the quality is concerned. For the cost of G15, it really outlived its sensor size. G15 should have been at least m43 size if not APS-C. The cost just doesn't justify the size.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 16:27 UTC
In reply to:

JonSr: GF3 was a cursed crippled miserable creature. I couldn't get rid of it fast enough. Panny is showing their determination to produce crapware to lure unsuspecting buyers a junk they have to replace as soon as they purchased this. Total Assory of a Product representing true nature of the management. Shame on you.

example of Lens Barrel Shadow on GF3
https://plus.google.com/u/0/115412895113423610903/posts/3JdxbenYKx3

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 21:30 UTC
In reply to:

JonSr: GF3 was a cursed crippled miserable creature. I couldn't get rid of it fast enough. Panny is showing their determination to produce crapware to lure unsuspecting buyers a junk they have to replace as soon as they purchased this. Total Assory of a Product representing true nature of the management. Shame on you.

true. 1. Lens Barrel Shadow with Standard Zoom Lens. 2. No Remote Control 3. No External Microphone Jack. 4. Tripod Base Mount blocking SD Card access. 5. Uncomfortable Handling Ergonomics. Except Lens Barrel Shadow, rest I can live with. But that's fatal flaw because it is all you get.

If you are using a GF1 which was what I wanted initially, GF3 is not an upgrade. GF5 won't be either.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 07:06 UTC

GF3 was a cursed crippled miserable creature. I couldn't get rid of it fast enough. Panny is showing their determination to produce crapware to lure unsuspecting buyers a junk they have to replace as soon as they purchased this. Total Assory of a Product representing true nature of the management. Shame on you.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 06:44 UTC as 72nd comment | 8 replies

facebook trashes photo.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 22:37 UTC as 64th comment

I no longer read Newspaper. I no longer believe media. I read comments. I look at snapshots bystander took. I listen to heresy of people around. So I read reddit and 4chan(believe me it is a real source of real life). So goes all my respect to those in that field.

Journalism and Photo Journalism is dead to me. And its all your fault, you fancy tricksters. Mr. Novaks and Newsweek photo editors of these world, go to hell. My anger is deeper because I had much respect to those who took journalism seriously. I hate you all and if you are a youngster trying to make it in the world, remember, you are there for money and it comes with attention and journalism has nothing to do with it. So go for the money and you can go to hell, too.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 21:19 UTC as 150th comment
In reply to:

JonSr: oh come on.. one of the best lense maker keep making crappy lense what is with this? i swear that made a pact with Panny to never make a high end lense to lure them into m43. I just can't understand this spec. f2.8-4 of previous excellent 43 lenes than this lense would have been the best lense on the market.. They intentionally refused to make it that. Both Panny and Oly can go to hell. This is intentional sabotaging of their own platfrom from within.

most equivalent lense to this is Zuiko Digital 14-54mm F2.8-3.5 II, a total marketing flop even though the quality was much better than kit lense. But that one was a fast lense. It seems Oly wanted to make a "video" kit lense. Tell me one lense with such spec F3.5-6.3 that produce quality photo? I can only think of crappy third party lense of old vivitar time.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 03:13 UTC
In reply to:

fmian: This lens only confirms Olympus' strategy to dumb down their own current and potential user base.

Give more zoom and a 'power' label, with smaller glass so people can less appreciate good optics.

Market your macro numbers so the number is bigger, confusing and misleading novice buyers.

State in product brochures that the 4/3 sensors are LARGE. (seriously, WTF?)

Start a marketing campaign in which your own cameras are called 'real' cameras. Whatever that means.

It's about as genius as Apple calling the ipad 'magical'.

but iPad is magical. you likely don't have one or don't have a child.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 02:49 UTC
In reply to:

JonSr: oh come on.. one of the best lense maker keep making crappy lense what is with this? i swear that made a pact with Panny to never make a high end lense to lure them into m43. I just can't understand this spec. f2.8-4 of previous excellent 43 lenes than this lense would have been the best lense on the market.. They intentionally refused to make it that. Both Panny and Oly can go to hell. This is intentional sabotaging of their own platfrom from within.

problem is that this is not the kit lense. we have decent kit lense both in panny and oly camp. This specific lense does not add much value over kit lense. I do not believe this lense will yield clearer photo. Only benefit is slight increase in FoV and sealed body. Would you like that on your kit lense for $350 more? One more step down and it would have been the lense everyone salivates to.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2011 at 11:16 UTC
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »