This ugly looking camera represents 2015? Really?
Mike FL: The price is the same but "The Sony mount does not include the VC image stabilization functionality".
The point is Tamron charges the same.
I hate companies do that.
Lol the V3 scored the worst among enthusiast mirrorless cameras.
It is also the worst in terms of IQ among all 1" sensor cameras including compact and mirroless.
What is Nikon thinking.
Dpreview is moving forward by reviewing such camera.
beavertown: When will Nikon release a close to professional grade DX format like 70D Mark II with at least a few decent prime lenses?
Nikon doesn't have many DX prime lenses. Most of their recent DX bodies, not very recent really, don't have internal motor for auto focusing AF lenes . Meaning only AF-S lenses work for the recent DX bodies.
Decent prime lenses for DX from Nikon and Tamron?
When will Nikon release a close to professional grade DX format like 70D Mark II with at least a few decent prime lenses?
Looks like a Nikon P7800 but a much better camera.
kadardr: Nikon 1 J4 double lens kit is $546 right now. It is better than this and has a 28-295mm reach.
Nikon 1's sensors are made by Aptina.
Nikon can't even make a sensor that matches IQ in 2003.
But the image quality is crap.
G7x: 71J4: 53
Nikon 1 please use Sony sensor!
The IQ of the V3 looks really bad. Especially high ISO raw.
Does this USB dock also used for unbreak of 3rd party lenses support in the future? Like nasty Nikon switched off Tamron A005 for the V1 via dirty firmware update.
If yes, Tamron and other 3rd party lenses manufacturers should release a dock like Sigma does.
How about using this 20mm on a DX body?
Amazing photos that put the Nikon 1 IQ to shame.
Airbus is better than Boeing.
Someday, Cankon should shop making lenses.
How come Canon's bodies look very pleasing while Nikon's very ugly?