12 hours ago
 |
Boris F
Joined on
Oct 1, 2011
|
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
AllMankind: Come on Sigma... What about an E-Mount version.
Olympus OMD and PEN, can use lens without IS, but they make it for Sony ;-) Why?
Amazingly sharp, why no for 4/3?
monkeyking: Does the Tamron lens get physically longer when zooming out like the Panasonic 14-140?
Yes, but it is look nice. http://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&hl=it&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&twu=1&u=http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20130131_585931.html
Great idea, boring and cheap build camera..... :-(
My suggestion is EM-5 with Foveon sensor it might be a brilliant camera !*!*!*!
After using OM-D for a few month, I can say, it isn't small. Many times I decided not to take it with me because this reason. I can't even imagine how I can drag with me a DSLR or FF DSLR.
BTW, 5-axis IBIS equal 4 stops, tested and verified.
http://www.camerastuffreview.com/olympus-lens-review/review-olympus-45-mm
Hasselblad is even bigger camera compare to FF, bigger sensor, better studio quality and higher price. So what? Is it a better camera? Dependent to what you are looking for.
Looks many people forgotten about evolution and what has happened to dinosaurs ;-)
Let's see, what make a human attractive?
Is it only beauty or only soul?
The answer is alltogether. OM-D EM-5 it is!!!!
Very good sensor + IBIS best on the market + JPEG engine, one of the best + soul (yes soul) make it.
OM-D, enjoying use it, despite of it was a bit out of my budget.
Thanks, Oly.
Boris F: OMD EM-5 is the King!
Look for ISO performance, it is maybe one stop only below full frames.
D800, without any doubt, is a great camera. Maybe a little bit too expensive and too bulky.
About ISO: maybe for RAW files it is 1.85 stops better, but not for JPEGs.
Don't forget, about GREAT 5-axis image stabilizer. It is shot on S1/5 sec, handheld, without any blur!
OMD EM-5 is the King!
Look for ISO performance, it is maybe one stop only below full frames.
Boris F: Canon and Nikon have to join the m43 community!
Otherwise they will find themselves on the Nokia's today's position.
Times when every camera's company develop their own mount's system are over. Imagine to yourself that each computer's motherboard company will develop their own PC extension connections, instead use the PCIe and the USB. And using this way try to limit their customers to chose extensions (lenses) from the only one manufacturer. These times are over! We are in the 21 century now!
Wake up, make better products and customers will choose you. Don't limit a customer by "inventing" new mounts!!!
XPro-1, has everything? 2 lenses? With the original mount.
Nex? Four slow and huge lenses. With the original mount.
iPhone? It is a toy not camera.
m43 >20 lenses including fast lenses and top quality. With the m43 standard mount.
V1 with a big sensor :-)
Canon, common, make m43 and I'll buy it!
Try to make better than
Pany 20 1.7,
Leica 25 1.4,
Oly 45 1.8
and I'll buy it too!
Canon and Nikon have to join the m43 community!
Otherwise they will find themselves on the Nokia's today's position.
Times when every camera's company develop their own mount's system are over. Imagine to yourself that each computer's motherboard company will develop their own PC extension connections, instead use the PCIe and the USB. And using this way try to limit their customers to chose extensions (lenses) from the only one manufacturer. These times are over! We are in the 21 century now!
Wake up, make better products and customers will choose you. Don't limit a customer by "inventing" new mounts!!!
Too little too late!
Canon and Nikon have to join the 43 community. Otherwise they can find themselves on Nokia's today's position.
Is it possible to make faster than F1.8 for FL75?
The real beauty! Most desirable lens ever.
Ivanaker: I just cant understand the pricing of m43, or any mirrorless gear, it is way to much.
75 f/1.8 - $899.99
om-d - $1,299.00
on the other hand
nikon d7000 - $1,199.00
very new 85 f1.8 - $499.00
And that lens is an investment as you can venture to FX format with it.
Im glad m43 exists, some nice cameras and lenses from them, and they are pushing tech forward, and forcing Nikon, Canon, Sony, Pentax.... to make even better DSLR.
But i cant see how anyone can choose om-d + 75 1.8 when for the same money you can get d7000, 85 1.8(FX), 50 1.8(FX) and 35 1.8(DX).
And im not going even to venture into benefits of one system or another, ill give you that m43 is smaller.
F1.8 (m43) = F1.4 (APS-C)
FL 75 (m43) = FL 94 (APS-C)
GH3 is coming closer!
Is it prelude for it?
Great idea!
Great idea!