ARTASHES

ARTASHES

Lives in France France
Works as a Student
Joined on Sep 11, 2009

Comments

Total: 207, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 Sample Images (69 comments in total)

In reviews it would be nice to have some charts like focal range/aperture to have better idea about brightness of lenses especially for those super zooms , because here I see 20-1200 for 2.8-5.9 and I say myself "cool !!! it will be pretty bright at middle range" but as I could conclude from samples it drops pretty fast too 5.6 (I assume not knowing if it's the max aperture for those focal ranges) and keeps relatively fixed it's aperture to it's max zoom

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 13:24 UTC as 40th comment
On article Nikon launches budget-friendly Coolpix L620 ultra zoom (40 comments in total)

The raison why Nikon ot other companies put as some say those 'tiny' sensors with such high megapixel count on their compacts is Sony and the mass production effect, that's what the sensor market propose them, and they take it because it's probably the best product for the price
if they put bigger sensor, they have to put bigger lenses etc and so on, and the price will rise and so the sales will go down, if you want a big sensor compacts you can have it, there are several ones depending of what you mean by saying 'big' sensor
1/2.3 already have it's market and production lane, on so it's somehow the optimum for sensors that provided and megapixels that rise are usefull for marketing and dont take from you anything but your disk-space so it isn't end of the world

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 16:05 UTC as 17th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon launches budget-friendly Coolpix L620 ultra zoom (40 comments in total)

As there is no info about aperture it is 3.3-5.9

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 11:43 UTC as 26th comment

How Samsung achived to obtain such detailed jpeg at 100% from 13mp 1/3 sensor when their 1/2.3 camreas are so bad ?

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2013 at 20:39 UTC as 16th comment
On article Just Posted: Olympus E-PM2 Review (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

ARTASHES: Cons: "OM-D image quality in smaller, lighter, cheaper body"
I think this is the biggest of pros of this camera ;)

"trolls" isn't the the right word here.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2013 at 17:26 UTC
On article Just Posted: Olympus E-PM2 Review (164 comments in total)

Cons: "OM-D image quality in smaller, lighter, cheaper body"
I think this is the biggest of pros of this camera ;)

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2013 at 22:43 UTC as 45th comment | 4 replies
On Connect post Hands-on with Nokia's Lumia 925 and exclusive interview (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: "Unfortunately for mobile photography enthusiasts the Nokia representatives would not comment on whether we can expect Nokia 808 camera technology in a Windows 8 phone any time soon."

That's bad news. That's what I've been waiting for - a 41 Mpixel monster with OIS and, hopefully, 1080p60 / stereo Rich recording. Or even 4K, even if "only" at 15-20 fps.

808 was announced much later 2009 and at that moment Nokia and more others were using Sony sensors in their flagships

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2013 at 15:42 UTC
On Connect post Hands-on with Nokia's Lumia 925 and exclusive interview (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: "Unfortunately for mobile photography enthusiasts the Nokia representatives would not comment on whether we can expect Nokia 808 camera technology in a Windows 8 phone any time soon."

That's bad news. That's what I've been waiting for - a 41 Mpixel monster with OIS and, hopefully, 1080p60 / stereo Rich recording. Or even 4K, even if "only" at 15-20 fps.

I don't judge it by it's pixel output, but for it's size, that's normal for 41 mp 1/1.2 sensor to be noisy at 100% view, but it was bad event at web view, above 800 ISO there was some color cast and banding (but great details), when Sony's 1/2.3 back-lit are pretty good up to 1600, maybe that was Nokia's bad jpeg processing, but is suspect that at time Nokia gone for other sensor supplier (due to unique size and spec of sensor) but which wasn't as advanced as Sony's sensors
PS I think the same thing is happening with HTC One

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 23:06 UTC
On Connect post Hands-on with Nokia's Lumia 925 and exclusive interview (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: "Unfortunately for mobile photography enthusiasts the Nokia representatives would not comment on whether we can expect Nokia 808 camera technology in a Windows 8 phone any time soon."

That's bad news. That's what I've been waiting for - a 41 Mpixel monster with OIS and, hopefully, 1080p60 / stereo Rich recording. Or even 4K, even if "only" at 15-20 fps.

Lets hope it will have better sensor (Sony), original 808 sensor was actually mediocre for it's size especially at high ISO department,

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 22:33 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Hands-on Preview (204 comments in total)
In reply to:

rladd: A Question:

The G6 uses the same sensor as the G5 and the GH2, right? Panasonic's press release says "the new Venus Engine is attains high-performance signal processing with the advanced noise reduction system." I'm wondering to what extent image quality can be enhanced without changing the sensor. Any thoughts?

I love the G5; it handles great and produces great images but at about ISO 1600 noise starts to become an issue. If the G6 produces a one-stop equivalent advantage over the G5 in terms of noise I will definitely buy it.

I think it's mainly about jpeg processing

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2013 at 09:43 UTC
In reply to:

ARTASHES: curious to know more about the sensor and if it has global shutter like recent Sony camera

today's cameras with CMOS sensors use "rolling shutter" for videos which causes some distortion with fast moving object or when you moving fast the camera, that's somehow nasty especially for professional use, that problem can be solved with "global shutter"
both of them are electronic shutters

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2013 at 07:03 UTC

curious to know more about the sensor and if it has global shutter like recent Sony camera

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2013 at 22:10 UTC as 24th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Earthlight: Is this really still the same old 18mp sensor? What is this, some weird alternate reality where sensor development does not exist?

Steve D Yue
G1X's sensor isn't better than anything you listed, and in fact todays Mft and nex series have better sensors than any Canon APS-C camera ever made

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 10:51 UTC
On Connect post Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S4 (135 comments in total)

Saw some samples, they were very good to me,
One thing I can't understand, if Samsung has such a great jpeg processing to squeeze such detailed and balanced (even when viewing at 100%) results from such a tinny sensor (at least at base ISO) why their P&S have such a mediocre IQ

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2013 at 22:55 UTC as 33rd comment

Looks like nice camera, an X100 alternative maybe but first of all it has no OIS something that isn't really negligable coopeled with f 2.8 lenses means that in low light to have a sharp photo you gonna have to stay at 1/15 at least (I had Casio Z850 with f2.8 and no OIS) when I can obtain some sharp pictures with f3.3 and 1/6 in the same conditions (assuming that we take stood objects) and then there are some compacts that has even better IS and more than step faster lenses than this Nikon, so this isn't going to outclass todays high end compacts in low light by big margain, it will do it in critical IQ and DOF which makes it's market pretty restricted

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 13:19 UTC as 117th comment
On article Just Posted: Nikon D7100 Hands-On Preview (311 comments in total)

Assuming that the DSLRs are becoming more video orientated apart from natural improvements as better sensor, focusing, features, one day it would be nice to see global shutter and down-sampling for video

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 16:49 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

marike6: Let the games of "Name that DOF equivalent" begin.

Yes, I really don't understand this obsession about the DOF for those compacts, with such a fast lenses and small but good sensor the low light performance of XZ-10 will probably be better than any past generation enthusiast compact and so we search new thing to criticize

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2013 at 21:45 UTC
On article Olympus announces Stylus XZ-10 enthusiast compact (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

Richard Murdey: 1:1.8-2.7

Wow. That's all you need to know, right there.

1:1.8-2.7 is all about low light capabilities of the camera and not the DOF

Direct link | Posted on Jan 31, 2013 at 18:31 UTC
On article Olympus announces Stylus XZ-10 enthusiast compact (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

ARTASHES: Before everybody starts to complain about sensor size just check this sensor performance on the other compacts (Canon HS50, SX240)
If it had 1/1.7 sensor it would have been bigger with same speed lenses (XZ-2 is that camera actually) or it would have the same size with slower lenses and you would lose all your IQ gain in low light !!!

@dpLarry
Honda S2000, Caterham R500 ...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 21:12 UTC
On article Olympus announces Stylus XZ-10 enthusiast compact (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: with a tiny 1/2.3"sensor, this might be good for my 7 y.o. child, to introduce her to photography...
but surely anyone in their right mind wouldn't consider this over ANY of the already small 1/1.7" sensor cameras.
I really don't see the point of the existence of this camera, if not for kids.

@Timm
Give us a wish list of compact camera with it's sensor size (that isn't "small") and lenses please

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 17:56 UTC
Total: 207, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »