ARTASHES

ARTASHES

Lives in France France
Works as a Student
Joined on Sep 11, 2009

Comments

Total: 229, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

WesPerry: This thing looks like a cheap children's toy compared to the PhaseOne XF. I'm sure performance will be comparable.
Also, even though I'm a Sony fanboy, it's a little sad to see that Sony is supplying all the medium format sensors. Is there no one capable of competing with them??

:-)

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 09:44 UTC
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

WesPerry: This thing looks like a cheap children's toy compared to the PhaseOne XF. I'm sure performance will be comparable.
Also, even though I'm a Sony fanboy, it's a little sad to see that Sony is supplying all the medium format sensors. Is there no one capable of competing with them??

Marcio all you said shows me right, I mean I wasn't saying MF IQ was a crap, not at all, I just saying that it would be much better if their sensors were developped at the same speed that thoses on more compact cameras, I dont think that with todays technologie you have to compromise so much high ISO quality to have a good base IQ. The poor performance of MF in that area shows the oldness of that tech, a good tech responding to needs of pro but still an old tech.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 09:43 UTC
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

WesPerry: This thing looks like a cheap children's toy compared to the PhaseOne XF. I'm sure performance will be comparable.
Also, even though I'm a Sony fanboy, it's a little sad to see that Sony is supplying all the medium format sensors. Is there no one capable of competing with them??

marcio_napoli That's why they are stopping use them ?

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 14:31 UTC
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

WesPerry: This thing looks like a cheap children's toy compared to the PhaseOne XF. I'm sure performance will be comparable.
Also, even though I'm a Sony fanboy, it's a little sad to see that Sony is supplying all the medium format sensors. Is there no one capable of competing with them??

Yep, that is also the raison why past generation MF sensors were so outdated, nobody developped them and then came Sony and put it's profitable small sensor tech into MF, without growing smaller sensor market the MF would still have kodak 2000-ish sensors.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2016 at 18:19 UTC
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

ARTASHES: This is actually an APS-C DSLR with f4.5-6.7 17-400 OIS lenses.

I was talking about low light performance, 1" type sensor being 1 and hald step worse than APS-C, I just put down max aprteure by an a half and step.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 12:46 UTC
On a photo in the Sony RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

No need to hope, it's about 2 steps better than 1/1.7.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 19:49 UTC
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

ARTASHES: This is actually an APS-C DSLR with f4.5-6.7 17-400 OIS lenses.

APS-C sensor sized camera if you prefer, but theorically and technically I think that it's faisable but it's an other story. I just did the equivlance.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:55 UTC
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)

This is actually an APS-C DSLR with f4.5-6.7 17-400 OIS lenses.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:18 UTC as 62nd comment | 4 replies
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)

Curious to know how fast it drops to f4 in zoom range

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:14 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply
On a photo in the Sony RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

Sony jpeg engine can be pretty bad et mid ISOs, even on Sony's last FF cameras, some pics looks like crap, especially in shandows.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:09 UTC
In reply to:

phazelag: I wonder where all the arm chair lens engineers who have repeatedly told us what cannot be done will hide now?

The question is how soon the lenses will go down to f4 in zoom range.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 17:32 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2078 comments in total)

Compared to D7200 luminance noise on Sony looks kind of washed out which gives impression of less noise in monotone areas but in fact it looks like if there was some NR

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 21:22 UTC as 337th comment
In reply to:

Photato: Larger pixels than Note4, 5 and S6, good.
But too bad they went back to that pesky 4:3 aspect ratio.
They keep moving things around so we never get the perfect specs.
For me is 8MP and 3:2 AR.
Sticking to my beloved Note 4.

Larger pixels (especillay when the difference is so marginall) mean nothing. It's all about marketing, just like HTC ultrapixels. Only sensor size will change the IQ.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (617 comments in total)

"The K-1 becomes the first conventional DSLR to offer a stabilized full-frame sensor."
Sony disagrees

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 13:55 UTC as 145th comment | 1 reply
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)

A question please : how much more time it takes to capture in "Pixel Shift" mode a photo that would take 1/100s in normal mode ? 1/25 ? or there is some addtional interval time ?

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 01:48 UTC as 52nd comment | 1 reply
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (978 comments in total)
In reply to:

solarsky: Multi-shot Pixel Shift Resolution mode is the outstanding feature here, imho. It gives me the image quality of a 4x over-sampled image at nominal resolution. What would I otherwise pay for the resolving power of a 144.8 MP camera? $1800 or rather $180000?

Oly is doing the same thing and also has IBIS, the thing is having a sensor that can shift, let's hope that the importance of this feature will push CaNikon to introduce IBIS in their DSLRs in order to have it too.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 22:39 UTC
In reply to:

Brian Isaman: Somewhere, Rishi is quietly shedding a tear for Sony...

Of cours, Samsung archived to produce a sensor as good as Sony's one, Toshiba as well (assuming that Toshiba was making it's sensors with Sony) , Canon is catching up, so Sony's monopole position of last years is being defied, all good for consumers !

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 19:57 UTC
In reply to:

Brian Isaman: Somewhere, Rishi is quietly shedding a tear for Sony...

Well Sony never stopped upgrating their sensor tech, I am pretty confident that by the time this tech commercialised, Sony will have something as good if not better.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 19:39 UTC
In reply to:

stevez: I too am surprised at how large this lens is. Considering that its almost identical in size, weight and dimension as my Nikkor 300mm AFS f4, I can't help but think that Olympus might be considering a full frame mirrorless down the road. Another thought is that the lens was designed with an overly large image circle in order to assure excellent edge to edge sharpness. Hmmmm?

I understand what you're saying : 300mm f4 mounted on 4/3 delivers on the sensor surface the same amount of raw light as 600mm F8 on FF. I am getting it. The thing is that in today's industry especially for comact cameras nobody is talking that way. We do get FF equivalent focal ranges for comacts (25-200mm for exemple) but never FF equivalent aperture. Assuming that everybody knows that the sensor size is a game changer for IQ the equivalence on aperture becomes irrelevant (not for DOF However). If not the people would not juge cameras potential by their sensor size but by FF equivalent aperture. That's how I see it.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 23:50 UTC
Total: 229, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »