ARTASHES

"trolls" isn't the the right word here.

Cons: "OM-D image quality in smaller, lighter, cheaper body"
I think this is the biggest pros of this camera ;)

Cons: "OM-D image quality in smaller, lighter, cheaper body"
I think this is the biggest of pros of this camera ;)

808 was announced much later 2009 and at that moment Nokia and more others were using Sony sensors in their flagships

I don't judge it by it's pixel output, but for it's size, that's normal for 41 mp 1/1.2 sensor to be noisy at 100% view, but it was bad event at web view, above 800 ISO there was some color cast...

Lets hope it will have better sensor (Sony), original 808 sensor was actually mediocre for it's size especially at high ISO department,

I think it's mainly about jpeg processing

today's cameras with CMOS sensors use "rolling shutter" for videos which causes some distortion with fast moving object or when you moving fast the camera, that's somehow nasty especially for...

curious to know more about the sensor and if it has global shutter like recent Sony camera

http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/fujifilm_x20_review/Personally I am disappointed with IQ

Steve D Yue
G1X's sensor isn't better than anything you listed, and in fact todays Mft and nex series have better sesnors than any Canon APS-C camera ever made

Steve D Yue
G1X's sensor isn't better than anything you listed, and in fact todays Mft and nex series have better sensors than any Canon APS-C camera ever made

Saw some samples, they were very good to me,
One thing I can't understand, if Samsung has such a great jpeg processing to squeeze such detailed and balanced (even when viewing at 100%) results...

Saw some samples, they were very good to me,
One thing I can't understand, if Samsung has such a great jpeg processing to squeeze such detailed and balanced (even when viewing at 100%) results...

Looks like nice camera, an X100 alternative maybe but first of all it has no OIS something that isn't really negligable coopeled with f 2.8 lense means that in low light to have a sharp photo you...

Looks like nice camera, an X100 alternative maybe but first of all it has no OIS something that isn't really negligable coopeled with f 2.8 lenses means that in low light to have a sharp photo you...

Looks like nice camera, an X100 alternative maybe but first of all it has no OIS something that isn't really negligable coopeled with f 2.8 lenses means that in low light to have a sharp photo you...

Looks like nice camera, an X100 alternative maybe but first of all it has no OIS something that isn't really negligable coopeled with f 2.8 lenses means that in low light to have a sharp photo you...

Assuming that the DSLRs are becoming more video orientated apart from natural improvements as better sensor, focusing, features, one day it would be nice to see global shutter and down-sampling for...

DxOMark gives scores for low light only based on sensor performance that said low light and high ISO performance are two different things and DxOMark score is more(only in fact) about high  ISO and...