PIX 2015
ric63

ric63

Lives in Australia New South Wales, Australia
Works as a Manager Volvo Group Australia
Joined on Jun 19, 2009

Comments

Total: 159, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On 16bDan_ISO6400_76mm-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

I know my RX10 would have done a better job, I have posted some images here taken at horrendously ISO and looked great, with some comments noting same.
I just question this new stacked sensor now??

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 00:00 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

I know my RX10 would have done a better job, I have posted some images here taken at horrendously ISO and looked great, with some comments noting same.
I just question this new stacked sensor now??

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 00:00 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

I know my RX10 would have done a better job, I have posted some images here taken at horrendously ISO and looked great, with some comments noting same.
I just question this new stacked sensor now??

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 00:00 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: Here it is edited to plus .65 http://www.scottzinda.com/Working-Files/DPR-Test-Image-RX10II/i-k7BgTbf/0/O/scottzinda.com-.jpg

Now THATS better :-)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 23:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: Here it is edited to plus .65 http://www.scottzinda.com/Working-Files/DPR-Test-Image-RX10II/i-k7BgTbf/0/O/scottzinda.com-.jpg

Now THATS better :-)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 23:58 UTC
On 07Dan_ISO6400_24mm photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: Here it is edited to plus .65 http://www.scottzinda.com/Working-Files/DPR-Test-Image-RX10II/i-k7BgTbf/0/O/scottzinda.com-.jpg

Now THATS better :-)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 23:58 UTC

Well after seeing those images I will definitely NOT be rushing out to buy a RX10II.
My RX10 would slap this silly.
I agree with Jeff Greenberg, a comparison would be great, and I know which one would win straight away.
If your not into video or slow mo, get an RX10 before they are gone.
I have always laughed at people saying "oh no never buy the first of a new model, Ill wait till the second one"
I have had A100, H1, HX100 and now RX10, all first models, all take amazing images, and all had poor effort second models.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 23:34 UTC as 17th comment | 4 replies
On 16bDan_ISO6400_76mm-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:20 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:20 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Again, SOOC is more pleasing and accurate.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:20 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)

I think the SOOC image is far better, yes a tad dark, but the adjusted one looks muddy, messy and noisy.
Just a simple tad of brightness would have done the trick.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:08 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (6 comments in total)

I think the SOOC image is far better, yes a tad dark, but the adjusted one looks muddy, messy and noisy.
Just a simple tad of brightness would have done the trick.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:08 UTC as 3rd comment | 2 replies
On 07bDan_ISO6400_24mm-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

I think the SOOC image is far better, yes a tad dark, but the adjusted one looks muddy, messy and noisy.
Just a simple tad of brightness would have done the trick.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:08 UTC as 3rd comment | 2 replies
On baby belly in the announcements challenge (1 comment in total)

Love the pic, well done & congrats.

Sorry, hate the watermark, should not be on here.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2015 at 22:37 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

CharlesBos: No touchscreen for fucus pulling and a lot of slomo !? I think i buy the FZ1000 for half the price. I do not believe the RX10II will be a success. Only if the image quality is visibly better. We shall see.

BOOM!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 06:28 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: Hi Rishi
Can you please let me know where the Tulip Sunrise image was taken?

It's stunning :-)

Hi Rishi,

Thanks so much for the reply.

Stunning image BTW :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2015 at 05:37 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)

Hi Rishi
Can you please let me know where the Tulip Sunrise image was taken?

It's stunning :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2015 at 22:57 UTC as 27th comment | 3 replies
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1656 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Sony will buy out/take over Canon within 2 years!
Same old Same old-------------------------------------

They are only protecting their interests.
How can a company about to fold due to no new or interesting products for how long now, keep buying sensors and tech from Sony?
So, keep it viable with Sony cash, its win win for Sony.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 23:44 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1656 comments in total)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Sony will buy out/take over Canon within 2 years!
Same old Same old-------------------------------------

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 20:58 UTC as 248th comment | 2 replies
On Photokina 2014: Canon stand report article (69 comments in total)
In reply to:

ric63: Still no tilt/swivel screen Canon??
C'mon now!

Fair enough.
I do a lot of ground level shooting and for me it's almost essential.

This is just Canon supplying lightly made over units and saying "hey we're Canon I'm new buy me" They should at least start supplying basic things on their cameras that compare with the opposition. A tilt / swivel screen is just a basic norm that other companies supply, but as it would cause Canon a headache to re design the body, they simply won't do it.. So how interested are Canon in providing something really new? Not very, just a few bits here and there and say I'm new. Cop out really.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 21:53 UTC
Total: 159, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »