Future user

I'm 30 and have a real life already, which I don't want to lose thanks to all these bastards. I want to control all the situations whenever possible. If Al Qaeda put a bomb where I travel, that's...

Well, I find one advantage for me in this situation: most likely they don't expect a tourist to have a weapon. They attack apparently easy targets, therefore might be at least surprised when I show...

I always take maximum precautions against thieves when travelling. Fortunately I haven't had to use my weapon yet, but I do feel more secure having it with me when travelling. Worst case, it's...

It's a shame these sons of bitches are free on the streets and not in jail. Unfortunately this is the world we live in: either you protect yourself or you are in risk. And now I know what to do If...

High iso will be excellent. There's little doubt about that. However, let's make no excuses: Canon needs better DR with no pattern noise/banding. They've milked the same 18mp sensor for 4 years,...

Since all bells and whistles come to the new AF mode and there isn't any mention to expanded DR, you'd better not expect miracles. I guess the rumored 46mp FF will come with better DR, otherwise it...

The great fact with the 70D is that, for the first time, live view AF is truly useful on a DSLR. This combined with the swivel screen, may bring some new life to the DSLR camp. Until now, you had...

So true. Let's enjoy what we have instead of blaming its weaknesses. We might die tomorrow, after all

Treat it as a low iso cam, don't pixel peep, don't try to get shallow DOF, and you'll be happy.

If I was to get a superfast lens, I'd get an Olympus OM 50mm f1.2, which is very small and light, and certainly cheaper to obtain.

It's great for the speed freaks. This brings comparable to 85mm f1.8 DoF capability. Now we need a 12mm f0.95 and 67.5mm f0.95

As long as technology improves, M4/3 might reach D800 levels iin a few years in all respects (resolution, high iso, DR, AF performance...), but DOF. Then it could become "good enough" even for many...

Don't worry, that problem is more usual with FF. With m4/3, unless you are shooting extremely close, the whole face will be in focus.

12-40 f2.8 is good, although I'd prefer 12-50, 12-60, or even 14-70, if it's f2.8-3.5 or f2.8-4. 40-200 f4 is good, although...well, I guess there are size constraints as a f2.8 or f2.8-4 would be...

Better if it's not 12-35 but 12-50 or 12-60 even if it's slower at the long end (f2.8-4 or f2.8-3.5). 12-35 is a somewhat shortish range. 14-70 f2.8-4 would be great too.

As it's been said it's the sharpest M4/3 lens and one of the sharpest ever made on any system. It will hold very well when 24+ mp sensors are released. A lens for many years for sure. Also a great...

This will compete with the Hasselblad lunar for the absurdest camera of 2013...

It's all said. DOF difference is very noticeable, as is the weight/size difference. That's not subjective. However, value is subjective: some pay for a more portable system, some pay for larger...

It seems super sharp, even sharper than 60mm macro. Now Sigma needs to make a 135mm f2.8 as a cheaper alternative to the upcoming Panasonic 150mm f2.8.

It could be smoother, but isn't that bad at reduced viewing sizes.  Leaves in the background always are a hard subject for bokeh. The thing is, M4/3 gives more DoF than bigger systems and needs the...