PIX 2015
light_bulb

light_bulb

Lives in Germany Ruhr Area, Germany
Works as a Researcher
Joined on May 30, 2008

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Phase One 645DF+ with IQ250 field test article (146 comments in total)

Thanks for the review Damian.
However what you have written concerning highlight recovery/shadow lifting in post pretty much reminds me of my experience with the Pentax 645D and it would require further testing to demonstrate that this - at least at base ISO - is superior over a Nikon D8X0 or Canon 5DS/R.
Moreover there are not that many fast lenses for medium format and MF sensors are usually smaller than the respective film formats which results in not that shallow DOF than one might expect.
Generally larger sensors have been somewhat overrated taking into account that sensor development is focused on small sensors and high pixel densities which results in a trickle up of technical progress to larger sensors which eliminates some of their size-related advantages.
Thus the air for medium format has become somewhat thinner.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2015 at 19:00 UTC as 3rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

light_bulb: It is one of the most obvious contradictions of our days that we see how insecure the internet is, while at the same time more and more business models are based on cloud storage and permanent internet access.
Every hardware that has significant resources to offer and is permanenty online is just an invitation to NSA and other hackers to apply their malware.
Farewell Adobe!

I did not suggest that CC requires a computer that is permanently online (how often do you have to to qualify for using a service you have paid for?) or that you have to store your files in the cloud. I was referring to a general trend and Adobe has done a first step into that direction that you may or may not like.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2015 at 08:17 UTC

It is one of the most obvious contradictions of our days that we see how insecure the internet is, while at the same time more and more business models are based on cloud storage and permanent internet access.
Every hardware that has significant resources to offer and is permanenty online is just an invitation to NSA and other hackers to apply their malware.
Farewell Adobe!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2015 at 15:19 UTC as 12th comment | 5 replies
On CP+ 2015: Canon shows off prototype 120MP CMOS sensor article (255 comments in total)

What they did not tell is that this sensor has been designed on behalf of the NSA.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 19:26 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
On Best Camera of 2012: And the Winner is... article (1412 comments in total)
In reply to:

adrianf2: OK. Olympus won 'fair and square'. But what exactly did they win? A popularity contest among the visitors to this site from a pre-determined list that excluded many excellent cameras.

I have bought a D800 and voted for it. However if the OMD were able to properly AF my FT lenses I do not know what I would have done.

In a side by side comparison with low dof shots (D800 85 1.8 G versus OMD 45 1.8) the OMD was the clear winner. With its image stabilisation and face recognition it was good for so many keepers, while the D800 setup was a lot of miss and seldom hit. The focus sensors are simply to big for this kind resolution/low dof and focusing accuracy seems to lack too.

This OMD technology is what every low dof portrait shooter would like to have instead of fiddling with focus sensors. You can even choose which eye the camera should focus on.

Thus the D800 certainly has its strong points but the OMD is a much smaller package combined with very good image quality and some compelling innovations.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2013 at 11:38 UTC
On Just posted: Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM lens review article (182 comments in total)

Sigma has managed to do some serious overhaul with their lenses.
I am using the Sigma 120-300 2.8 OS and am very happy. No reason to go for a 5k $ Nikkor.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 22, 2012 at 16:23 UTC as 23rd comment
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeffrey Lockwood: Can someone explain to me why Canon would get rid of the ISO dial and instead keep the exposure comp? I never, ever, use the exposure comp settings on either my G11 or my 7D, but I change ISO all the time. If you shoot RAW, why would you ever need to? Other than doing some HDR work, which if you are advanced enough to want to do that, you should be using RAW. I understand that a lot of photography novices will buy this camera but it really is a very good pocket camera for those with DSLRs and why wouldn't you cater to that market a bit more? Can someone give me a good reason for exposure comp that perhaps I don't know about?

What I cannot understand is why the default crop is always on the label of that bottle. It does not provide sufficient fine detail to allow for a reasonable comparison at this level of resolution.
Better stick e.g. to the feathers on the right hand side of the picture to establish what the selected cameras can resolve.
Cheers Andreas

Posted on Feb 16, 2012 at 15:38 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7