Mateus1: Everything is great about X-E2 apart from plastic and "waxy" high iso jpg oefrormance.... 3200-6400 images look terrible, no details, they are worse compared to X-E1. In this area X-E2 is a big dissapointment... it's is sad that Fujifilm is deaf to all pleas of many X-E2 users to solve it in new firmware.
Well-known problem with Fuji jpg. Shoot RAW and you'll be fine.
A truly inspired composition! You are the Ansel Adams of digital photography!
The price point is absurd when compared to the Sony NEX or to the Samsung NX lines.
sierranvin: How interesting, Nikon. @ $400/MP, this fab D4s is equivalent to the Sony a7R being priced at $14,400! Except the a7R only costs $2,300, or $63/MP!Who's your friend?
(And thanks in advance to everybody who is about to tell me MP don't matter...)
Sounds as if you'd be happiest with a cell phone camera. You'll minimize your $/MP.
I'd opt for a Crown Graphic instead. Much more capable and flexible, and only a bit heavier.