kei1309: too many newbies and fauxtographers making funny comments. not only the samsung fanboy *laughs* but from the other camps too.
i feel that Samsung shouldn't follow Canon with their style of giving minimal upgrades and disguising it as a new model with different styling.
Samsung has great glass, but even then, great glass can't save a sensor that's notable for poor high ISO, as seen with the previous NX cams. what the new series has remains to be seen. but i'm willing to bet....
Have you compare the Sony NEX7 sensor with NX200? Look both RAW and then say some about the "poor high ISO"
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 06:10:26 UTC
mugupo: Good is a baby steps, but real feature people want, is a 3g or wifi function let you save your photo to a web server.
All Samsung WiFi cameras have a Backup PC mode, there from any hotspot server you can transfer your images to you PC in home though internet. Also in a Cloud or n online server.
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 17:45:57 UTC
jj74e: I don't see what advantage flexible screens will provide for camera designs. A curved screen would skew what an image would look like on any other flat screen (unless for some reason people start wanting curved screens on their laptops, TVs, etc.), so flat screens would still be the practical choice even if flexible screens mean different body shapes? But maybe I'm missing something
Also, is this article saying that AMOLED screens only save energy when there are black parts present (because then they can simply turn off)? I thought AMOLED technology was inherently more efficient than LCDs regardless of what the image is presenting.
They are. The black is really black in the AMOLED compared with PMOLED and LCD, so the contrast in high luminous environment is better. The color are more real but that depend of the adjust in the contrast and saturation. When you have part of the scene dark or completely black, the AMOLED use less energy than a LCD that practically use the same energy than all the screen white.
Direct link |
Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 17:39:28 UTC
The problem with the transparent OLED is transparency itself. The actual Transparent AMOLED are between 50 and 60% of transparency, that is not enough to make a good OVF. The AMOLED technology more than the PMOLED or the Sony OLED technology is the promise for the future EVF, they are faster, more contrast and with better color.
Direct link |
Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 17:35:26 UTC
as 18th comment
IeraseU: I think the larger screen is a great feature. It's almost like a 'mini-tablet'. However, I do feel that the 5MP camera will be a little bit behind the times when compared to the competition, in particular the iPhone 4S.
I agree, the 8MPx sensor on Galaxy S2 is excellent I got excellent pictures with it and I use every day to support diagnostic through microscope, and first time I really want a higher MPx sensor (10 or 12). I think Samsung could use one of them on the next Galaxy S3
Direct link |
Posted on Oct 19, 2011 at 18:49:13 UTC
nofumble: In short, it works like a regular LED display like what's on your iphone except in higher density and extremely high contrast ratio.
Nothing here could prevent Samsung from copy it, and make it better and cheaper.
This technology is not from Sony, I think it is from Sharp or Toshiba. Samsung has 98% of the OLED market and more than 50% of the actual OLED patents. Even the AMOLED tech used in Samsung display are more useful, because those are real Active Matrix RGB display with individual control of the pixel and true black background, but the AMOLED tech is not available to so high resolution.
Direct link |
Posted on Sep 8, 2011 at 14:13:02 UTC
Jogger: so, this looks like a high density LCD with a OLED backlight? does each 3 sub-pixel unit have its own white OLED backlight?
What you are talking is an AMOLED, it is clearly not an AMOLED display. Your post is partially right, it technology look like a LCD with a white organic background (no active). This is made with the similar tech than LCD for high resolution pixels because the AMOLED tech doesn´t reach that pixel density right now.
Direct link |
Posted on Sep 8, 2011 at 14:03:38 UTC
South, FL, United States
kei1309: too many newbies and fauxtographers making funny comments. not only the samsung fanboy *laughs* but from the other camps too.
i feel that Samsung shouldn't follow Canon with their style of giving minimal upgrades and disguising it as a new model with different styling.
Samsung has great glass, but even then, great glass can't save a sensor that's notable for poor high ISO, as seen with the previous NX cams. what the new series has remains to be seen. but i'm willing to bet....
Have you compare the Sony NEX7 sensor with NX200?
Look both RAW and then say some about the "poor high ISO"
mugupo: Good is a baby steps, but real feature people want, is a 3g or wifi function let you save your photo to a web server.
All Samsung WiFi cameras have a Backup PC mode, there from any hotspot server you can transfer your images to you PC in home though internet.
Also in a Cloud or n online server.
kenghor: This must be a joke for the RAW shooters.
Why?
jimr: The Samsung TL 500/ EX-1 also has an OLED screen................
It's a steal of a deal with its high speed lens...
The Samsung NV24HD was the first OLED (AMOLED) camera in the market.
jj74e: I don't see what advantage flexible screens will provide for camera designs. A curved screen would skew what an image would look like on any other flat screen (unless for some reason people start wanting curved screens on their laptops, TVs, etc.), so flat screens would still be the practical choice even if flexible screens mean different body shapes? But maybe I'm missing something
Also, is this article saying that AMOLED screens only save energy when there are black parts present (because then they can simply turn off)? I thought AMOLED technology was inherently more efficient than LCDs regardless of what the image is presenting.
They are.
The black is really black in the AMOLED compared with PMOLED and LCD, so the contrast in high luminous environment is better.
The color are more real but that depend of the adjust in the contrast and saturation.
When you have part of the scene dark or completely black, the AMOLED use less energy than a LCD that practically use the same energy than all the screen white.
The problem with the transparent OLED is transparency itself.
The actual Transparent AMOLED are between 50 and 60% of transparency, that is not enough to make a good OVF.
The AMOLED technology more than the PMOLED or the Sony OLED technology is the promise for the future EVF, they are faster, more contrast and with better color.
That is just a Apple fan that made a thing thinking about Apple.
IeraseU: I think the larger screen is a great feature. It's almost like a 'mini-tablet'. However, I do feel that the 5MP camera will be a little bit behind the times when compared to the competition, in particular the iPhone 4S.
I agree, the 8MPx sensor on Galaxy S2 is excellent I got excellent pictures with it and I use every day to support diagnostic through microscope, and first time I really want a higher MPx sensor (10 or 12). I think Samsung could use one of them on the next Galaxy S3
This article is about iPhones or camera smartphones??
nofumble: In short, it works like a regular LED display like what's on your iphone except in higher density and extremely high contrast ratio.
Nothing here could prevent Samsung from copy it, and make it better and cheaper.
This technology is not from Sony, I think it is from Sharp or Toshiba.
Samsung has 98% of the OLED market and more than 50% of the actual OLED patents. Even the AMOLED tech used in Samsung display are more useful, because those are real Active Matrix RGB display with individual control of the pixel and true black background, but the AMOLED tech is not available to so high resolution.
Jogger: so, this looks like a high density LCD with a OLED backlight? does each 3 sub-pixel unit have its own white OLED backlight?
What you are talking is an AMOLED, it is clearly not an AMOLED display.
Your post is partially right, it technology look like a LCD with a white organic background (no active).
This is made with the similar tech than LCD for high resolution pixels because the AMOLED tech doesn´t reach that pixel density right now.