ybizzle

ybizzle

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Nov 14, 2011

Comments

Total: 264, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Two in one: LG G5 camera review (69 comments in total)

I bought the G5 specifically for the wide angle lens. Now I just can't go back...It is quite remarkable how much more you can fit in!

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 01:26 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

wri7913: I wonder how many of the Sonikon fanboys could shoot without "chimping" their screen every shot.

Back in the days of film, you had to know how to make a photograph using the fundamentals of Photography. You had to think through each shot and imagine how it would look or know how it would look based on your settings.

Today its pixel peepers galore, chasing after the largest megapixel (while either not printing or small prints under 11x14) while preening about their sonikon gear. LOL

Exactly why I still shoot film. You actually have to get the shot right the first time! Of course, both digital and film have their places and fun factor!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 18:01 UTC

Excellent choice for the purist who cannot be bothered with modern day fluff. However, My M6 Titan does exactly the same thing and if I want a digital photo, I just scan my negative!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 17:57 UTC as 326th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ybizzle: Exactly the reason why I have the new LG G5. Wide angle lens built in without the need for bulky add ons.

It is not fish eye. It's ultra wide. And 8mp is more that enough for its intended purpose.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2016 at 15:44 UTC

Exactly the reason why I have the new LG G5. Wide angle lens built in without the need for bulky add ons.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 14:32 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies

Create beautiful photos at a bargain price! I like it!

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 17:54 UTC as 50th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ybizzle: Or just get a real enthusiast pocket camera with a big, bright screen and better IQ for the same price and call it a day.

Oh no, I think I really hit a nerve with Mrrowe8. He must have been the only one person who bought one of these things. Either that or he works for dxo. ;).

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 01:48 UTC

Or just get a real enthusiast pocket camera with a big, bright screen and better IQ for the same price and call it a day.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 00:13 UTC as 15th comment | 7 replies
On article What a view: Aukey Super Wide Angle lens quick review (64 comments in total)

Buy a real camera and fish eye lens and call it a day.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2016 at 00:37 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

ybizzle: Remember the good ol' days when you didn't have to worry about this crap and just buy any old 64MB SD card for your 2mp Kodak digicam? I miss 2002...

I actually still have that cam! My very first digital camera!

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 20:58 UTC

Remember the good ol' days when you didn't have to worry about this crap and just buy any old 64MB SD card for your 2mp Kodak digicam? I miss 2002...

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 20:12 UTC as 33rd comment | 7 replies
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with Tamron's new SP prime lenses (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

ybizzle: Both Tamron and Sigma have raised their game and lens quality which rival or beat the same offerings from Canon or Nikon. Bravo!

I can't comment on that but I do know that my Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 on my a99 is razor sharp across the board at a fraction of what Sony charges for their own brand!

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 03:31 UTC
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with Tamron's new SP prime lenses (101 comments in total)

Both Tamron and Sigma have raised their game and lens quality which rival or beat the same offerings from Canon or Nikon. Bravo!

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 03:00 UTC as 22nd comment | 12 replies

Wait 6-8 months and pick up any of these for 60% of original cost. Remember the $1100 Coolpix A? I bought mine a year after release for $400. And that was Canadian dollars!

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 05:31 UTC as 159th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ybizzle: Or just buy one camera like the Panny FZ1000 and cover most lengths with just one camera from wide to telephoto at a fraction of the total cost of these 3.

Oh sorry, I didn't know stating facts was "nitpicking". It's your money so go head and spend the extra $200 on this vs the $800 FZ1000. All I'm saying is that for most people, one camera is enough to cover their focal length needs. Yes there will be some that may require the extra wider focal lengths, but for most 24-XXX is good enough.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 04:56 UTC
In reply to:

ybizzle: Or just buy one camera like the Panny FZ1000 and cover most lengths with just one camera from wide to telephoto at a fraction of the total cost of these 3.

Right but the Panny costs less and is a faster lens at the long end, though slightly shorter focal length.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 04:37 UTC

Or just buy one camera like the Panny FZ1000 and cover most lengths with just one camera from wide to telephoto at a fraction of the total cost of these 3.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 04:24 UTC as 195th comment | 8 replies
Total: 264, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »