Noogy

Noogy

Lives in Philippines Manila, Philippines
Works as a HR Head, Intel Corporation
Joined on Aug 11, 2008
About me:

Moved from Canon 7D to Canon 6D, but loving both cameras, including the new 100D :)

Comments

Total: 80, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

calterg: Americans should bring a class action suit against nikon and force them to replace d600 shutter mechanisms with the new unit.

Sometimes the only way to teach these mammoth corporations a lesson and draw a little bit of humility from them is being suing their asses off.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 01:13 UTC
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: This is a another scandal and PR disaster for Nikon.

Whoever is responsible should be fired shortly after whoever is responsible for the SB-900, D800 and D600 testing.

And not to say the point is clearly the hallmark of the uninitiated.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 00:53 UTC
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

keepreal: I have found only one comment here critical of DP Review for buying into the Nikon story behind the D610.

"Nearly a year after the arrival of Nikon's full-frame D600, its replacement has arrived. The new D610 is a very minor upgrade to the D600, with just three new features"

and the forlorn hope that potential Nikon buyers will trust them after badly letting down D600 customers.

DP Review does give lots of info in most of their detailed reviews and this is useful but you have to read between the lines. In this instance they are economical with the obvious truth and I am afraid that makes them a littler less trustworthy and open to some suspicion where they get their funding from.

At the same time, you refuse to admit you made a mistake awarding Gold to a defective camera design, almost like saying "assuming the consumer is lucky to have a unit that does not proliferate oil and dust on the sensor, this camera is a winner!" Come on, was it not more prudent, in hindsight, to suspend a final rating while waiting for clarity on the issue from Nikon, versus appearing like suckers to them? That is how credibility is lost, those missteps that are remembered next time we rely on a particular website for respectable, believable review.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 00:52 UTC
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eyeglass10101: Before all the Nikon haters (aka Canon shooters) start bashing Nikon for quickly implementing a D600 replacement due to the oil issue, please don't forget your own recent flop/hand irritant/chemically unstable, Canon t4i. Remember that one? Or do you just remember the t5i?

And that T4i defect has zero effect on image quality, not apple to apple, try harder.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 14:53 UTC
On Nikon D600 In-Depth Review preview (20 comments in total)

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikon-d610/

Cheers to DPR for the gold rating of D600 - a clearly defective camera by design and component. The link above is the implied admission from Nikon. Next time raters from DPR, it is better that you state "we withhold any final rating on this camera at this time until we see a conclusive fix from Nikon" or something like that and save yourselves the embarrassment.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 14:51 UTC as 13th comment
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)

In several forums in the past, I shared my inside info that Nikon was redesigning its defective Nikon D600. I challenged DPR's gold rating of the D600 because of its inherently defective design, proven by the fact that I knew the Nikon engineering team was readying its redesigned model. The release of D610 should be proof enough that its predecessor suffered from a major design flaw that made repairing ultimately more costly to Nikon and more damaging to its brand.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 12:26 UTC as 198th comment | 1 reply

Olympus Camedia was my first digital camera ever :) It sucked battery life like there's no tomorrow, would wipe out two Alkaline double As after about 20 shots without flash, but hey - it bought me from film to digital! Also with technology limitations then, I sometimes feel people were actually compelled to take better photos, hence they produced better photographers than the crappy ones who live and die on post-processing today.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 02:14 UTC as 94th comment | 1 reply

Hey it's just that I need to upgrade, you know! :P

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2013 at 01:00 UTC as 128th comment
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 700D / EOS Rebel T5i review article (178 comments in total)

Right camera for its target market, not for most of us airheads and arrogant, self-proclaimed photographers that gang up on newbies in this forum. If solely on the basis of comments, Nikon and Canon should have both been out of business for a very long time. They make shabby cameras and are the relative personification of all things evil in the digital imaging world, with images that are noisier that the noise in this forum. But lo and behold, Nikon and Canon continue to make tons of money as they have over the past few decades.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 15:45 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies
On 2013 Pulitzer Prize photography winners announced article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

harry: Why winning photography has to do with human brutality and suffering?

They should get an award for risk-taking, not photography.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 01:58 UTC
On 2013 Pulitzer Prize photography winners announced article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

harry: Why winning photography has to do with human brutality and suffering?

There are more subdued "wars" happening out there that are worthy of awards too, such as the daily war against poverty, human trafficking, etc. That both winners had to be from the same war zone is truly strange to say the least.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 13:08 UTC
On 2013 Pulitzer Prize photography winners announced article (50 comments in total)

I find the photos nice but I don't think I will remember them after seeing them, which means to me they don't stand out. Nice, but not impressive. The subject or subjects? Do they really need to pick photos from the same war in the same country? I guess that seems to be the favored theme, which is kinda sad.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 13:06 UTC as 7th comment
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wilmark: "We covered this issue in our in-depth review of the D600, last year."
From the review final page "We're working with Nikon to understand (and further test) this issue and we'll update this review accordingly as we use the camera over time."

First off the problem seems to be OIL and NOT dust. Big difference. The other point is that I see you did consider this issue in your D600 review and yet you awarded it your GOLD AWARD. I cannot see how one can recommend this camera with this problem - it was prevalent in the model you tested, yet you gave it one of your highest ratings for a DSLR. Now you will understand why I never look at DP review for buying choices, I just come for news. How can anyone trust your reviews, when you have highly recommended a camera that probably has a serious design flaw, even when you picked it in your test model. Your high rating is that with oil or without? (a la Mc Donalds combo)

Exactly the point I made when they rated there Canon 6d silver, not to contest the silver but to challenge the gold for the D600. And while we are at it, Nikon when will you formally admit an internal packaging design mistake, in semicon speak? Come on guys it is bleeding obvious.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2013 at 04:23 UTC
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (492 comments in total)

I shoot Canon but kudos to Nikon for continuing to raise the bar in the APS-C space. Let's see how Canon will respond. The last time it had a winning APS-C product was the 7D, and that was THREE years ago.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 11:44 UTC as 177th comment
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

topstuff: Nice camera. Lovely image quality. Loads of lenses available.

In many ways it is a "no brainer" and an obviously safe purchase.

But here's the thing - and I know this is unusual here on DPR, but these days I prefer using an EVF. I prefer the EVF because I don't chimp after the image, but instead get it right before I shoot.

For ME at least, I don't think I am likely to buy another traditional mirrored DSLR again.

I would personally welcome seeing more FF cameras with EVF's.

An unusual opinion maybe, but some of us prefer the road less travelled.

You can always attach a field monitor on any DSLR if you thirst for the EVF. Superb implementation of live view also works. I own the Sony NEX-5, it is a wonderful camera. But hell no, it is nowhere close to the image quality of FF DSLRs.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 14:36 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Dirt on the VERY sensor is miles apart from black tape problem. But you're right about QC compromises and cutting corners. Too bad Nikon benchmarked with us a few years back at Intel and yet it appears they learned little about package design and assembly.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 14:22 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Does not change the fact that it should have been called out more strongly. That until QC problems on the very sensor are conclusively kissed goodbye, avoid this camera. Or be prepared to wet clean your sensor, if I may quote you.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 14:01 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Wet-cleaning sensors is soooooo 20th century. At this time and age of manufacturing? Come on! I read the entire review of the 6D. What is clearly missing in the D600 review is a factual statement that should have said "for those who are lucky to purchase a unit without the QC problems, it is a terrific camera." Hope and luck have ceased to be bankable manufacturing strategies, last that I know.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 13:35 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Clean sensors rock guys. Common sense. Go take your risk. Your money anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 13:17 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)

DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 12:37 UTC as 112th comment | 14 replies
Total: 80, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »