mpgxsvcd

mpgxsvcd

Lives in United States USA, NC, United States
Joined on May 17, 2004

Comments

Total: 1449, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Nikon really should put this sensor in a small mirror-less body. I really want to get a full frame camera but I am too accustomed to small cameras now. They already have the DSLR body style covered.

I would love to see a mirror-less version of this camera.

"The one in the Sony A7ii should be similar, in a small body."

And right now that camera is the only one on my list. I would love to see a second one on there though.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 17:00 UTC

Some of them are terrific. Some of them aren't.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 15:23 UTC as 29th comment
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: A bit of a contradiction, DPR: you can't have a Pro being "best in class burst mode" but a Con being "limited buffer affects continuous shooting". They cancel each other out. Fouls on both teams: replay the down.

The burst mode speed is just fine. The only issue is that you can't shoot it as long as some other cameras. That is still useable though.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:50 UTC
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)

It is actually fairly good for video as well. None of that Canon dullness.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:48 UTC as 425th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)

Nikon really should put this sensor in a small mirror-less body. I really want to get a full frame camera but I am too accustomed to small cameras now. They already have the DSLR body style covered.

I would love to see a mirror-less version of this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:45 UTC as 427th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)

It kind of sucks...... For Canon that is.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:42 UTC as 430th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)

Time to break out the Platinum award!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:40 UTC as 431st comment | 4 replies
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1840 comments in total)

Canon still thinks they use better sensors.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:38 UTC as 432nd comment | 5 replies
On Enthusiast compact camera roundup (2014) article (14 comments in total)

This article is not on the homepage so almost no one sees it. Dpreview is missing out on a ton of hits because of this.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 15:05 UTC as 8th comment
On Mid-range Mirrorless camera roundup (2014) article (14 comments in total)

@dpreview

This article is not on the homepage so it isn't being seen by anyone who doesn't get the emails. You guys might want to fix that.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 15:05 UTC as 9th comment
On Enthusiast DSLR camera roundup (2014) article (21 comments in total)
In reply to:

KL Matt: Can anyone else still see this roundup on the DPR homepage? As far as I can tell, it's no longer visible under Dec. 16. Perhaps a publishing glitch. Would also explain the lack of comments.

It looks like they messed up when posting it. They are missing out on a ton of hits right now because this doesn't appear on the homepage.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 15:04 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (4 comments in total)

It appears that there are two different links for this article.

This link from the homepage has almost no comments.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/1724473533/entry-level-mirrorless-camera-roundup-2014

This one has many comments.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4901816163/entry-level-mirrorless-camera-roundup-2014?utm_campaign=generic&utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email&ref=notification

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 12:14 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On High-end pocketable compacts roundup (2014) article (16 comments in total)

I know I am not the only one that cares about these cameras. Something must be wrong or there would be more comments. Am I the only one that can see this article?

Dpreview can you look into this?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 04:31 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On High-end pocketable compacts roundup (2014) article (16 comments in total)

Can you define pocket-able for this category?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 01:22 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On Enthusiast compact camera roundup (2014) article (14 comments in total)

Was the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III left out of this comparo because you consider it to be pants pocket-able? Personally I don't think any of today's cameras are truly pants pocket-able. Most of them will fit into a jacket pocket though.

I would love to see a demonstration of someone putting one of these cameras in a pants pocket. That might make a really interesting video demonstration.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 01:19 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On Mid-range Mirrorless camera roundup (2014) article (14 comments in total)

The Sony A6000 is a very impressive camera.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 00:57 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1238 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I find it very interesting that Canon basically has a stranglehold on the Astrophotography world when their dynamic range is at such a HUGE disadvantage to other competitors. However, the fact that we stack multiple RAW images to remove the noise puts the Canon cameras on a more even playing field for Astronomy.

The stacking process relies on the fact that the noise is random and the signal(Light coming into the lens) is consistent. This means that we can easily isolate and remove the random read noise that plagues the Canon cameras in single exposure shots. We also use dark frames to further identify the noise that is present if there is no signal.

I hadn't heard that the Sony cameras had issues with RAW files before. Can Dpreview confirm that this is the case?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 23:10 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1238 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I find it very interesting that Canon basically has a stranglehold on the Astrophotography world when their dynamic range is at such a HUGE disadvantage to other competitors. However, the fact that we stack multiple RAW images to remove the noise puts the Canon cameras on a more even playing field for Astronomy.

The stacking process relies on the fact that the noise is random and the signal(Light coming into the lens) is consistent. This means that we can easily isolate and remove the random read noise that plagues the Canon cameras in single exposure shots. We also use dark frames to further identify the noise that is present if there is no signal.

Yes. That is correct. An A7s is about as good as it gets for AP.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 18:08 UTC
On Have your say: Best High-end Compact Camera of 2014 article (77 comments in total)

The only camera I don’t get is the Fuji X100T. I really don’t understand what the draw to it is. However, I have an open mind about it. So what makes it 3rd on this list?

Is it the optical/EVF hybrid viewfinder? It looks cool.

Are you really able to take all of the shots you want with 35mm only?

Then there is image quality. On paper the X100T looks like the one to beat in IQ terms. However, when I look at its RAW images across the entire ISO range I can’t help but notice the noise reduction that Fuji applies to their RAW images. If you want noise reduction in camera then that is what JPGs are for. If you want to edit the images afterwards then that is what “untouched” RAW images should be used for. You can’t shoot untouched RAW images with the X100T. All of them have NR applied.

So what am I missing? What do the owners of the Fuji X100T see that I can’t? Is it the nostalgic look and feel? If so then I get that. They really have recreated that look and feel of the old days.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 14:42 UTC as 17th comment
On Have your say: Best High-end Compact Camera of 2014 article (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Should have separated this into pocket camera and fixed-lens compact.. e.g. LX100/X100 and RX100/G7x do not belong in the same category.

None of them are truly pants pocket-able.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 14:37 UTC
Total: 1449, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »