Lives in United States USA, NC, United States
Works as a Jack of all Trades
Joined on May 17, 2004


Total: 2015, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (537 comments in total)

Jeff and Sam combined for an excellent and thorough review. Keep up the great work gents!

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:38 UTC as 125th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (537 comments in total)

"Auto ISO is available in manual exposure mode but the camera won't let you use exposure comp to specify how bright the image should be."

Panasonic's stance on Auto ISO is just baffling. They could do it right easily but they choose not to.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:36 UTC as 128th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony introduces Cyber-shot DSC-HX80 30x travel zoom (79 comments in total)

I am disappointed. I was expecting at least F4.0-F8.1.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2016 at 17:22 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

It almost sounds like he has never used a camera from Canon's competition. He appears to be oblivious to what is available from other manufacturers.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 19:14 UTC as 104th comment

That picture really makes him look smug. I hope Canon finds a way to be a leader in the industry again. I miss the days when Canon announcements were always a breath of fresh air.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 19:08 UTC as 105th comment | 7 replies

How long can they record continuous video for? I would like to replace a GoPro with the 18-50 camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 15:24 UTC as 98th comment
In reply to:

FodgeandDurn: 18-50, when I'm not shooting wildlife/sport that's the focal length I cover with 3 lenses on my mirrorless. If it's sharp, for shooting during the day I'd struggle to justify bringing a CSC and 3 lenses around with me instead of this.

At 18mm I'd also happily use it for a bit of astrophotography. I know people bang on about larger sensors for astro, but 99% of a pleasing image is post processing, the next most important thing is controlled CA in the corners etc... got some amazing astro results from the RX100, so I can only surmise that this would be excellent too, perhaps on a hiking holiday where you find yourself amongst mountains/trees/water+stars.

Astrophotography requires HUGE focal lengths. What you are referring to is night scapes. Both are cool but they require vastly different cameras.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 14:56 UTC

F6.9 is the new F4.5. Apparently physics doesn't apply to these cameras.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 14:49 UTC as 9th comment

I wish Interlaced video had never been invented. I am shocked to still see it around in 2016.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 14:52 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply

20 megapixels @ F6.9 with a 1/2.3" sensor. Take that Physics!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 14:50 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply

Despite our complaints and valid reasons why Canon cameras are inferior to everything else they continue to sell. It just baffles as to why that is. However, I have no doubt that enough people will buy this camera for Canon to justify making a 90D with mediocre upgrades and a significant price bump in the years to come.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 14:44 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply

Is Canon seriously bragging about finally putting 1080p @ 60 FPS video in their cameras in 2016?

I get it this camera meets the needs of most users. The problem is that it costs $1200 without a lens and $1800 with a “kit” lens. That is a very tough sell when every other manufacturer offers so much more for so much less.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 14:41 UTC as 35th comment | 3 replies

The title does a really good job of making you want to click on the link. To then let you down tremendously when you actually read that it doesn't do 4K video at a useful frame rate.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 19:53 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

I think I would rather it not have 4K video at all than have 4K @ 15 FPS. I wouldn't want to ever accidentally record anything at 15 FPS.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 19:51 UTC as 41st comment

Nice camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 02:05 UTC as 111th comment

Finally Canon is back in the game. This is a camera that offers features that almost no other camera has like 4K @ 60 FPS video. Now I just hope that this continues with their lower price models.

This is a good day for Canon.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 14:12 UTC as 39th comment | 4 replies
On article Nikon releases D500 4K UHD sample video (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: How many of you guys actually have 4k monitors ?

I only have Three. A 50 inch, a 55 inch, and the Mighty 80 inch.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 20:34 UTC
On article Sony introduces new XQD and SD cards (57 comments in total)

The most important thing is how much do they cost. If they are charging $1000 per card then they might as well not exist at all.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 20:42 UTC as 22nd comment | 2 replies

For anyone asking for anything greater than 4:2:0 can you show me a real world example where 4:2:2 or 4:4:4 has a distinguishable difference from 4:2:0 for video?

Don't even bother showing me a test chart. I want real world examples.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 20:57 UTC as 13th comment | 5 replies

The more important spec is that it has to conform to BT.2020 color representation. There are some cameras that do 10 bit right now. However, I am not aware of any cameras that can record according to BT.2020 color representation at the moment.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 20:54 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
Total: 2015, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »