panpen: I can't take beautiful pictures unless I lug 15LB around my neck, print 4x6 and post on Facebook. Yep, that big label showing CANON on my neck strap makes me a pro.
15lbs for Facebook posting?Omg.. don't be silly, a smartphone like Samsung Note 4/Edge more than good enough.
Btw, a Hasselblad with standard or zoom lens don't even weigh that much, so which Canon camera and lens combi are you refer to?
zubs: Canon really need to innovate in the mirrorless market, they were caught sleeping and are now playing catchup. More pixels are not always the answer.
Frankly speaking there isn't much to compare a mirrorless to a high optic quality full frame camera.
So if high optic quality was not one looking for, alternately one can choose Canon compact "mirrorless" camera, a G7X or G1X mkII for example. ;-)
mcrazza85: Seriously, it's been two months since this first impressions writeup and there is still NO review of the D750. And what about the D810? Why, DPR? What gives?
Probably because it was just another Nikon D600/D610 with some D810 features add-on, so it's pretty much nothing to write home about.
Zeisschen: Most ugly mirrorless camera so far. When will Samsung start to employ designers? ALL of their products are of such a bad design :/
viking79: The DSLR lookalike Samsung NX30 DSLM camera are really good design over a rangefinder. Congrats you are still keeping it. Your choice of choosing it as your prefer camera mean it's a greater camera over your other Sony cameras. ;-)
NewForce: After many minutes playing with it, I feeling so clumsy using this camera. It's nice looking retro camera but wasn't nice to use in operation wise.
The way Fuji X-T1 retro design mimicking the old manual camera control, it may look nice but somehow it end up making me feel clumsy.
With a smaller camera body, my eye on the EVF and right index finger on the shutter button/dial, moving left fingers on the small top plate to make changes, especially the shutter speed, really make my experience feel odd & clumsiness.
Of course I can use the camera in Auto, but with the many dials on the top plate make me want to make use of them, or else they end up doing nothing and defeat the purpose of having them.
I am an old timer, but think I am spoiled by the advancement in electronics over the last few decades, to use 2 dials and some buttons control over A/S/ISO settings.
Perhaps you still liking the old way, but I definitely not very fond of combining old manual operation on a new digital camera.
I may be a old timer having many manual cameras before, but it's not 1970's~80's anymore, so this type of camera it's not for me anymore.
After many minutes playing with it, I feeling so clumsy using this camera. It's nice looking retro camera but wasn't nice to use in operation wise.
With German Carl Zeiss brand built quality and 2x~4x $998 price tag, this 50mm F1.8(only) lens IQ has to be top quality than the cheap Canon and Nikon 50mm 1.4/1.8 lenses.
Oh no... the vignetting of this CARL ZEISS lens only go off totally at F8.0, it was much worst than the cheap and good Nikon 50mm F1.8G lens which go off totally after F4.0. That was pretty bad and what a shame.
Maybe the blame should be with the Sony A7R?
lorenzo de medici: 'Nikon Inc., is committed to serving the needs of our customers. All our customer service inquiries are handled on a case-by-case basis.'
Yeah. Well. I went through the usual goat rope with my D600, I must have talked with 10 different Nikon service reps, there was one shutter replacement, finally I just told them I was tired of them and I would deal with it myself. Fortunately my guess that the problem would resolve over time was correct. Now it's fine. I understand that not everyone has had the same experience. The whole thing left a really bad impression on me, I still like and buy Nikon gear but I won't buy any new camera they issue until it's been out for at least a year. They handled the whole mess quite badly and made a lot of people angry. If they're pacifying the last few with new D610's, great. It won't repair all their previous screw ups.
I've heard some reports that some new D610 was still inherit with old D600 dust/oil-gate issues.
Alsone1: Sounds good but needs 4K @ minimum of 30fps given that 4K tv's are now appearing everywhere albeit at a (fast reducing) cost.
Personally I couldn't spend this much money on something I feel is already out of date.
Obviously you are one of those guy belong to "money has object", just like me. Btw, you can watch free 4K contents on YouTube. :-)
What a skin-deep comparison test by famous DPR.
Even the Chinese websites dc.pconline.com.cn has done a much better & more complete review in their latest mid-level DSLM comparison test.
Pentax was never a big player in 35mm film camera, and I've believe they not going to be the 3rd big player in 35mm digital camera.
Having said that, the 3rd camera big player position still open for all.
NewForce: Judging from the condition, I won't even pay for more than $1000.
Anyway, most antiques does not worth that kind of money when the original maker still alive. It is just a game for the rich to show off their wealth.
What I mean was back in 1932 with the maker still pretty much alive, the camera wasn't worth the money currently seeing in Auction.
You know, just like Picasso Le Rêve painting was worth only around $7K, it is now more than $48.4Mil.
Judging from the condition, I won't even pay for more than $1000.
Lucky Apple did not buy a toilet bowl company.Otherwise I'll have to shxx outside their Cupertino Flying sausage new HQ. :-D
Boerseuntjie: Does Samsung still make cameras?...LOL, they should stick to washing machines and phones
So Apple should stick to only making Mac PC?
Boerseuntjie: I can't wait for Samsung to shoot themselves in the foot when they finally abandon Android for their Tizen Os and I will watch them fall from their high horse...LOLhttp://www.androidauthority.com/first-tizen-smartphone-release-315838/
Why being such a hater?Did Samsung devices burned down somebody houses or electrocuted somebody like Apple iPhone and iPad that you've come to know? LOL...
joe6pack: It is priced too expensively for open source community to pick it up.
If it is $500, this will sell like hot cakes. Developers will put every feature you can imagine on this camera.
Maybe GNX still a Google Android device, so there's still some limit stopping Samsung to do whatever they like.
Perhaps Samsung DSLM both compact or SLR alike cameras will have better life come next year with models running their own Tizen 3.0 OS.
yonsarh: I would get a7 instead.
Should I say Phase One the best of all then?
Adrian Tung: I've seen this camera up close, it is really big and bulky for an MILC-Android hybrid.
My personal opinion, not that anyone cares, would be:1) should have been in NX300 form factor with optional EVF attachment2) should have provided dual memory card slots -- one for Android usage (apps, music, documents, etc) and one for frequent removal and swapping (i.e. captured RAW photos)3) offer cellular communication (GSM, etc)*
* more of a curio than a serious suggestion... but it would be neat to be the first, no?
I couldn't agree more with you.About the dual memory cards support it, not many need it, but it's a welcome feature, and maybe GNX2 will have it.
Yes I agree too, it's definitely one of the well designed box camera. good in my hands.
For more buttons and wheels,Well I think more probably Samsung design it are targeting Android smartphone users (and there's multiple millions of them), thus GNX come with less buttons and wheels.
HarrieD7000: Like most android gadgets this will be shown the first week after it is bought and then life a life in a cupboard.
@Roland & DaveE1, well Android phone should be consider as an Android gadget too. I'm wrong about it too?
I meet & know of many iPhone and iPad hard core users, including programmers. But now all of them are Android "gadgets" super fans.