Steve D Yue

folks have to remember triple layer for triple color capture for imagery has been around as long as the film era (kodachrome involves triple layers too), so it isn't a brilliant step to translate...

agree... hard G gif... not soft G jif... after all, it isn't ever a Jraphic Interchange Format... file extention... ever

sdyue

agree... hard G gif... not soft G jif... after all, it isn't ever a Jraphic Interchange Format... file extention... ever

btw... how many folks say hard G for Gigabyte [GB] now, after hearing the...

agree... hard G gif... not soft G jif... after all, it isn't ever a Jraphic Interchange Format... file extension... ever

btw... how many folks say hard G for Gigabyte [GB] now, after hearing the...

no, this is not related to just contrast control alone, but related to gamma curve control, which alters the DR curve itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction

this kind of control is...

no, this is not related to just contrast control alone, but related to gamma curve control, which alters the DR curve itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction

this kind of control is...

ASA/ISO 8/10/12/16/24... has been around for more than 50 years... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodachrome who remembers Kodachrome 25 slide film? as for digital... digital cameras only started in...

very happy to see ML unlocking for us what Canon is unwilling to do, or Canon is hoping to hold back and 'reserve slower for future' model updates.

so... it means Canon's 'sensor tech' is not as...

Awwwwesome !!!

lol

sdyue

Awwwwesome !!!

lol

(hey, they show my home city (Toronto) w/ CN Tower)

sdyue

any 'limited darkish background indoor studio lighting look' for outdoors for our digital era, is as backwards a look as 'flash photography' ('club black') of the film era (when they couldn't shoot...

any 'limited darkish background indoor studio lighting look' for outdoors for our digital era, is as backwards a look as 'flash photography' ('club black') of the film era (when they couldn't shoot...

very nice

sdyue

E-M5 has plenty of moire; it's all a matter of in-camera processing (or lack thereof) it's not enough to rely solely on the lowest ISO for shooting, one has to include higher ISOs beyond 'base' ISO...

impressive? it's all relative, and harder to judge without 'exemplar/benchmark/reference' points or 'context' comparing 'big-body-big-sensor-big-pixels' on downwards towards to smaller and smaller...

what is 'high ISO' for you may be 'Base ISO' for many others already used to ISO 800 as a starting ISO (those who predominantly shoot 'low light' work from Minimum 800 up) by the time one is at...

'excellent' IQ? hardly. Nikon's 24mp D7100 unremarkable at any price, worse in low light, worse on APS-C sensors than on FF. Nikon has already capped high ISOs on 24Mp+ for their FF D800/D600...

FF 85mm too long for good portrait; 70 isn't wide enough; it's more suited for long-nosed Caucasians, who look too 'bozo-clown-nosed' if closer than FF 50mm. i prefer FF 24mm in close, not so far...

by the time you're experienced at more aesthetically balanced (natural) 'golden ratio' compositions... you'll actually start using JUST the center AF points, because you 'see' it... when composing...

AF points are IDEAL if put narrower/closer to center, just outside key pts, than wider if you ever adhered to the beginner's 'one-thirds' rule exactly, one will discover due to every OVF usage...