Steve D Yue

Awwwwesome !!!

lol

sdyue

Awwwwesome !!!

lol

(hey, they show my home city (Toronto) w/ CN Tower)

sdyue

any 'limited darkish background indoor studio lighting look' for outdoors for our digital era, is as backwards a look as 'flash photography' ('club black') of the film era (when they couldn't shoot...

any 'limited darkish background indoor studio lighting look' for outdoors for our digital era, is as backwards a look as 'flash photography' ('club black') of the film era (when they couldn't shoot...

very nice

sdyue

E-M5 has plenty of moire; it's all a matter of in-camera processing (or lack thereof) it's not enough to rely solely on the lowest ISO for shooting, one has to include higher ISOs beyond 'base' ISO...

impressive? it's all relative, and harder to judge without 'exemplar/benchmark/reference' points or 'context' comparing 'big-body-big-sensor-big-pixels' on downwards towards to smaller and smaller...

what is 'high ISO' for you may be 'Base ISO' for many others already used to ISO 800 as a starting ISO (those who predominantly shoot 'low light' work from Minimum 800 up) by the time one is at...

'excellent' IQ? hardly. Nikon's 24mp D7100 unremarkable at any price, worse in low light, worse on APS-C sensors than on FF. Nikon has already capped high ISOs on 24Mp+ for their FF D800/D600...

FF 85mm too long for good portrait; 70 isn't wide enough; it's more suited for long-nosed Caucasians, who look too 'bozo-clown-nosed' if closer than FF 50mm. i prefer FF 24mm in close, not so far...

by the time you're experienced at more aesthetically balanced (natural) 'golden ratio' compositions... you'll actually start using JUST the center AF points, because you 'see' it... when composing...

AF points are IDEAL if put narrower/closer to center, just outside key pts, than wider if you ever adhered to the beginner's 'one-thirds' rule exactly, one will discover due to every OVF usage...

not really, in the film era, that's what most beginners [entry level] had for film SLRs... 24x36mm film anyway no different today. it just happens that for dSLRs of the digital era, some mfrs...

oh, yes, that 'star' flare effect... which directly mimic shots where the aperture is stopped down to a very narrow aperture, and the NUMBER of aperture blades is reflected in the number of...

oh, yes, that 'star' flare effect... which directly mimic shots where the aperture is stopped down to a very narrow aperture, and the NUMBER of aperture blades is reflected in the number of...

a better 'app' from anyone would be to offer a 'super-shallow-dof' look that is foreign to tiny aperture/tiny sensored systems, but originally a royal pain of larger FILM/digital sensor systems,...

mimicking fake analog optical lens flare?
lol.

ridiculous. as bad as seeing it replicated in non-photographic paintings or graphic illustrations [ditto: fake 'patterned' bokeh of OOF images]

i...

mimicking fake analog optical lens flare?
lol.

ridiculous. as bad as seeing it replicated in non-photographic paintings or graphic illustrations [ditto: fake 'patterned' bokeh of OOF images]

i...

what if they made it a law that EVERYONE MUST have such a device and MUST record every waking moment in one's life? as well as EVERY interaction with every other person? would privacy really matter...

what if they made it a law that EVERYONE MUST have such a device and MUST record every waking moment in one's life? as well as EVERY interaction with every other person? would privacy really matter...