GMak

GMak

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Oct 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

tutek: See sample images from the Canon G11. Excellent picture and better than the current G1X MKII. I am disappointed with the new model, the old Canon is better.

http://www.canon-ci.co.kr/pds/product/1250662756763_u3EBQOoR0p.JPG
http://www.canon-ci.co.kr/pds/product/1250662756997_s1gF5E8xkD.JPG

I agree. I'm stuck at the G12 level and haven't upgraded because it seems there was nothing to upgrade to... IQ is great, fully articulating screen, fantastic battery life, HD video… For me, a camera in this class must have an articulating screen - otherwise, I might as well go to the S-series.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2014 at 20:16 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

1360 mmm: Weaker than the previous model ... rather dull and noise quality to the Canon folks ... sorry ....!! But the new Weak!! $ 800 ...!! Very strange ...! With the new processor ..!! The quality of the old model 60 ... but the Model 2014 with 58 quality! With new processors and a wider aperture!! At least in the eyes of my 70 Quality ..!!

Sorry, but what is it you are trying to say?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2014 at 20:11 UTC

I agree with Backayonder. Can't understand their logic. My only criticism is the very suspicious way I received this email notifying me of this "amazing offer." Just click here and download... then launch the installer..." Come on! Does this sound like some Trojan Horse or some bot installer???!!! You didn't even go to an https site, and there was no Nik logo in the window, nothing. Too suspicious! I refused the great offer until I did some search and found out it was legit. Very strange.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 04:25 UTC as 59th comment | 2 replies

I suggest everyone on this discussion of MIL vs DSLR read "The Innovator's Dilemma" by Clayton Christensen. The Harvard Biz School prof's national bestseller explains exactly what's going on here: disruptive technology (DT.) To those of you so sure that MIL will/will not replace DSLRs, read the book. We probably can't predict it right now.

At first, DT is never as good as the technology it will soon replace. So it often gets applied in areas not originally foreseen- where the negatives aren't important but the positives are the solution to a critical problem of that market. That gives DT economies of scale and increased quality - then it may come back to dominate the market for which it was originally intended.

Polaroid & Kodak failed to embrace digital photography because it was first seen as terribly inferior to standard film technology- they couldn't imagine it getting better!

Canon and Nikon are in the EXACT same boat right now - will they row safely to shore, or sink?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2011 at 21:05 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4