lovEU

Lives in Switzerland Switzerland
Joined on May 26, 2005

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

lovEU: My local dealer recently told me he is somewhat bewildered how easily customers are paying Sony prices - I'm already curious to get to know if this will apply to the RX1R II too.

No way it is 30% but anyway, he really is surprised that Sony folks seem to spend money a lot more liberrally than Canikon guys :) For sure, this will not harm his pockets :)

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2015 at 17:14 UTC

My local dealer recently told me he is somewhat bewildered how easily customers are paying Sony prices - I'm already curious to get to know if this will apply to the RX1R II too.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2015 at 16:07 UTC as 218th comment | 4 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

@ Rishi Sanyal: Absolutely, it is very likely that a compromise due to constraints has caused this decision. Anyway, as a potential buyer I'd like Sony to re-think and design this "feature (and, to provide a much better battery life).

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 08:28 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

"You've already suggested you would be taking a pile of camera batteries up the mountain ..."

Oh, where did I suggest, and, what "pile"? Funny .. did you sleep well? Anyway, 3 batteries vs. battery pack is a difference. But somehow you have a point - only providing a battery life (CIPA) of 280 images this cam seems to be limited for many jobs. Otoh, you can take those 280 pics in record time :-)

I close this case now with one last remark from my side: a non-centered tripod mount on such a capable camera is just a bad idea resp. IMO a design mistake, that btw has been criticed even for smaller compact cams. But no prob: Buy it, use it and be happy with it.

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 08:22 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

"Just wondering... did you sleep well?"

Nice cam + basic design mistakes > should cause poor sleep for some guys (not me :-)

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 07:42 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

"You should be able to plug in external battery packs ..."

Well, in principle yes. But do I want to carry battery packs always? Mountains can be high. Or maybe I just got the idea.

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 07:21 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

Time lapse?

Edit:
Another point: Why causing the neccesity of having to demount the cam just for changing the battery? At night not always welcome.

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 07:13 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1609 comments in total)

Tripod mount not centered? What? Really? I only can shake my head in disbelief - trying to compete with DSLRs but then adding Cybershot-like features. Somehow funny :)

"The tripod mount is not centered and it prevents you from opening the battery compartment door when you're using a tripod."

I understand: Sony doesn't want me using this cam i.e. for photography at night. What a shame.

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 07:01 UTC as 165th comment | 12 replies
On article Red introduces 'Weapon' camera with 8K sensor option (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Btw, how does 8K translate into storage requirements?

Thank you, guys.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 22:06 UTC
On article Red introduces 'Weapon' camera with 8K sensor option (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

lovEU: Btw, how does 8K translate into storage requirements?

Sure, but I'd be interested to get to know a typical range ... and yes: it's not for me :-)

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 21:46 UTC
On article Red introduces 'Weapon' camera with 8K sensor option (104 comments in total)

Btw, how does 8K translate into storage requirements?

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 21:15 UTC as 25th comment | 6 replies
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)

How exactly does an "electronic first-curtain shutter" work?

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 08:36 UTC as 456th comment | 6 replies
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoron: I am getting D900...not this incremental upgrade....who's with me?

"why not skip ahead to the D3000 line?"

Oh, I see, D3000 was the future already :-)
*excited now*

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 08:33 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

richard4566: I'm concerned about it being manufactured in Thailand. My D800E and lenses made in Japan are perfection. Not a squeak! Other Nikon DSLR and lenses I've used made in Thailand, many quality, fit and clunky issues with not as high a level of "perfection".

What kind of lenses are you comparing?

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:42 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoron: I am getting D900...not this incremental upgrade....who's with me?

Waiting for D1000 ... :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:41 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

Martin Datzinger: For those interested in sRAW: Reconsider.

http://nikonrumors.com/2014/05/21/what-exactly-is-the-new-nikon-sraw-file-format.aspx/

Or check original source:
http://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/nikon-small-raw-internals

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:40 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

Martin Datzinger: They adressed all of my concerns I had about the D800 and that kept me from buying it (I went for the D600 instead, where those things were better). So for me, this is highly exciting.

+1
I somehow resited to upgrade from the D700, but resisting got more difficult now :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:39 UTC
In reply to:

Joseph S Wisniewski: The picture showing the eye is either deliberately deceptive or totally misinformed. The radius of the eye is many times tighter than the Petzval surface of the eye's lens. That is why much of the retina forms a flat tension surface in front of the curved eyeball. The optical system, as drawn, would be substantially worse than a flat retina.

Eyeballs are round because eyes tilt and pan. That's all there is to it.

Thanks.
"It appears that Sony's own PR people, ..."
Now, that's funny somehow and in another way not. But not really an unknown phenomenon (tech/engs vs. marketing/PR).

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 06:46 UTC
In reply to:

Joseph S Wisniewski: The picture showing the eye is either deliberately deceptive or totally misinformed. The radius of the eye is many times tighter than the Petzval surface of the eye's lens. That is why much of the retina forms a flat tension surface in front of the curved eyeball. The optical system, as drawn, would be substantially worse than a flat retina.

Eyeballs are round because eyes tilt and pan. That's all there is to it.

May I ask if Sony's approach makes sense in your opinion?

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 06:04 UTC
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: 2560x1080 ...

I have two good 4:3 screens and a hight of 1024 now. Thats more or less the same pixel area. So ... this is not an investment that feel necessary. I am waiting for half the pixel pitch. 2000x5000 or so would be nice :-)

4608 x 1440 px is what I'd suggest
(2 x 1440 px coming with16:10 resp. 32:10 ratio, 1440 px due to manufacturing)

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2013 at 13:49 UTC
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »