Tariag

Tariag

Lives in France France
Joined on Jun 2, 2008

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9

My biggest complaint is about exposure. Why did they went for an individual exposure? It makes like a "bubble" picture!
With same exposure for all subsensors, they may be less DR but a far better looking result imho.
Then I also clearly see an optical resolution limit (don't know if it's the main lens or the sublenses), but I think this can be improved too...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2012 at 02:14 UTC as 48th comment
In reply to:

cheenachatze: Why do they charge so much for this "Power Zoom" lens? Every $100 camera has "Power Zoom" lens. These small lenses require less material to make, and it's not like Panasonic has amazing manufacturing technologies that are light years ahead of Canon, Nikon etc., so why are they charging such prices for their lenses? Panasonic 20mm F1.7 retails as much as Canon 50mm F1.4. How do they justify that?

Development costs.
Exclusivity
These lenses have whole new optical formulas, while Canon's 50mm have at least 50 years...
The "power zoom" is the only one on the market.
Panasonic is a real, serious lens manufacturer, don't understimate them.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 11:35 UTC
In reply to:

GoCUBuffs: Looks like it lost image stabilization from gf3? Seemed to be a nice additional feature on the prime lenses that don't come w/ stabilization built in.

NO panasonic camera has in-camera stabilization.
It's always in the lens!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 11:32 UTC
On Just posted: Our Samsung NX200 in-depth review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

patchfree: Similar to Pana GX1 but GX1 has a smaller size, included the lens. So no real choice: GX1.

half? 4/3 sensor is 13mm high, APS-C is 15,7mm, just 20% more...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 17:58 UTC
On Compact Flash Association announces XQD card format article (84 comments in total)

What's the advantage over SD? Larger capacity?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2011 at 22:13 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies
On Preview:panasonicdmcgx1 (318 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jun2: Pany needs to give us f/2.8 standard zoom lens instead of another body that doesn't offer anything new.

m4/3 prime lenses are very good, bright and inexpensive!
Very bright zooms will always be expensive, so it's a small market, of mostly professionnals, and professionnals don't use m4/3...

Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 09:09 UTC
On Preview:panasonicdmcgx1 (318 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: The bottomline with this whole interchangeable lens lot is first off - the promised "DSLR-like" image quality has not been met, despite iterations and reiterations by Pana, Oly and Sony (though Sony seems to have the edge on image quality among the three with its latest NEX rendition).

Second, I agree that Pana has fallen short of expectations with the GX1 and the GF3. I was in fact seriously considering to replace my wife's NEX-5 with the new GF-series camera, anticipating it would be the game-changer that the GF1 was. I am disappointed.

It depends what you call a "DSLR-like IQ"...
Oly's interchangeable lens cameras have an IQ very similar to Oly's DSLR.
Of course, you can't compare with a 5DII or a D3X!

Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 09:06 UTC
On Preview:panasonicdmcgx1 (318 comments in total)

Ah great news!
This GX1 is exactly what I waited for the (so disappointing) GF3.
As a EP1 user, now I may switch to pany...
I just LOVE this GX1, it's exactly what I need!

Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 09:01 UTC as 98th comment

Unfortunately, no macro...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2011 at 10:59 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9