Velvia88

Velvia88

Lives in United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Joined on Apr 21, 2012

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
In reply to:

gati: I have a X10, a Olympus xz1 and a Ricoh GRD4. I only shot jpg because I find it boring and timeconsuming to postprocess on computer. I have compared the photos from the three cameras and the X10 stand out as a clear winner. The JPGs from the Fuji X10 are magic, compared, especially to the Ricoh grd4, the diffrence is enorm to Fujis favor. The olypus xz1 is not bad but x10 is in a class of its own. (talking about jpgs straight out of the camera). The ricoh grd4 has a whole lot of ways to control the photos, sharpness, colors etc but in vain, the photos still looks preatty terrible compared to X10. I will keep the X10 because it gives the most pleasing colors on jpgs I have seen so far. The white orbs are ofcourse not a good thing but I have not seen it in any photo so far so for me its not a big deal.

/Gati

Hi Gati & DPR, I would love to choose X10 as my preferred DSLR sidekick in this size & price range, with its largest in class sensor, 2nd fastest lens, famed jpg processing together with fast focus & low noise even in low light, plus unique EXR sensor tech & Fuji colour & have been eagerly waiting resolution of this orb issue. But issues still confusing me even besides orbs are: 1) why are dpreview crop comparison results so noticeably poor (esp in sharpness & noise at base ISO) for X10 even vs smaller sensor, slower lens compacts (esp look at paper clips and watch sections) contrary to all +ve comments and reviews on IQ 2) do RAW files actually benefit from EXR pixel pairing DR/NR HARDWARE technology, especially in PASM mode and when taking RAW only shots on the fly when defaulting to JPG mode 3) is there vignetting and flash blocking issue at 28mm, easily confused AF, slow start up, poor stabilisation esp in low light and 1/5 of LCD taken up with data that cant turn off, as reported?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 17:45 UTC

From this comparison it looks like orb fix has been at expense of overall sharpness/resolution. Dpreview, is this actually the case, particularly at base ISOs where existing crop comparison test here already gives surprisingly bad result for X10 in sharpness & noise vs even competitors like S100 let alone others in same group test including XZ-1, G12 and P7100? (See especially paper clips and watch sections). Given the predominantly very positive reviews & forum comments on X10 image quality, sample pics from numerous sources & X10 specs (particularly sensor size, lens speed, jpg processing combo relative to competition in class), how representative was that original X10 sample in the crop comparison in fact? When writing up the long awaited full review, I will be particularly interested to see IQ comments (incl. sharpness & noise details) with the new sensor relative to latest versions of the group test (especially XZ-1 which seems closest on image generating spec and samples). Thx.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 13:36 UTC as 81st comment
On Fujifilm X10 preview (425 comments in total)

Seeing a few posts about focussing issues and macro problems. Is this a real issue on many X10s or just small sample?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2012 at 13:55 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X10 preview (425 comments in total)

With X10 can you use RAW on the fly (using RAW button) for selected shots when in JPG only mode with PASM modes and with DR increase using EXR sensor hardware pixel pairing rather than just software algo? If not can you use EXR sensor DR increase at all with RAW, how and to what extent?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2012 at 13:55 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X10 preview (425 comments in total)
In reply to:

FraserTK: If your expecting to be able to take a photo with this camera at night, you may be very disappointed. When you read the spec's this camera has a nice 30 second exposure, F/2 aperture, ISO 6400+, which is more than enough. All great until you realize you can only take a 30 second exposure on ISO 100, anything higher and the shutter speed is limited ISO 200 ~ 15 seconds, ISO 400 ~ 8 seconds, etc... Currently there is no notice about this - and I feel the camera is misrepresented. Great during the day thou.

@FraserTK: What about Night Scene or EXR SN mode? Doesn't that give good night/low light shots? If you can get great low noise low light shots (many sample pics in online reviews/Flickr etc) without long exposure why do you need long exposure times? Thx

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:39 UTC
On Fujifilm X10 preview (425 comments in total)

What has better image quality Fuji X10 or Olympus XZ-1? X10 orb issue aside (in hope of new sensor fixing it next mth as promised) still hard to answer as 1) despite rave reviews of X10 which also chosen over XZ-1 for IQ in dpreview group test, no X10 full review here (pending new orb fixing sensor?) but XZ-1 given rare dpreview Gold when fully reviewed (IQ highly praised) 2) no huge difference in sensor size & CCD vs CMOS has pros & cons on both sides, so X10 no clear advantage esp when considering pixel density of 12MP 2/3inch X10 sensor vs 10MP 1/1.63inch XZ-1 sensor (& X10 EXR only at 6MP) 3) Consensus seems to view Oly glass better aside from debate over which lens brighter 4) X10 DR enhancement seems only available up to DR400% in PASM modes, conflicting comments on if available in RAW in those modes or even in separate EXR point & shoot modes & DR beyond 400% only software algo not EXR sensor advantage 5)X10 sample pics great but non DR jpg crop comparisons here v poor. HELP!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:09 UTC as 18th comment
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6