sveper

sveper

Lives in Sweden Falkenberg, Sweden
Joined on Mar 15, 2008

Comments

Total: 25, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On photo Frozen morning sun in the Its Cold Out There challenge (11 comments in total)

Congratulations. Nice photo that really looks cold. Worthy winner.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2013 at 00:40 UTC as 11th comment
On photo P-51 in the Photo Spoilers challenge (3 comments in total)

The guy in front of me raises his camera for a shot of the P-51 just when I´m taking the photo.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 08:59 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:7496 (2 comments in total)

Thank you all!

Posted on Feb 1, 2013 at 11:43 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:7864 (19 comments in total)

Bugger!

Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 19:16 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo red arrows in the Smoke trails and contrails challenge (6 comments in total)

Awsome photo with the light makes it feel 3d. Don´t understand why someone gave it a 0.5.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 09:37 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo Tension in the What Is This? – II. challenge (6 comments in total)

Val is right. At Bovington tank museeum.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2013 at 08:52 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:7756 (11 comments in total)

In 02 they should have added: HDR. Or in its own category maybe.

Posted on Dec 18, 2012 at 08:49 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On photo Sea flower in the Wild About Wildflowers challenge (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

RuthC: Congratulations, sveper, on coming third with your beautiful and very unusual entry. Well-deserved! Ruth :-)

Thanks Ruth and CG33, much appreciated! Sorry I didn´t do any deeper research in what flower it was. I have only seen it on a very limited spot, just 50m, or so, from the (rocky) coast line, on the Island of Mallorca. Today I got deeper in to searching and found out it is a Caper bush: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capparis
I also was a little reluctant to enter the image since the focus wasn´t spot on on the Filaments. Anyway, have uploaded two more photos of the Caper bush in my gallery.
Cheers!

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2012 at 09:41 UTC
On Challenge:7542 (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

barb_s: wow, that was fast. I will certainly add another challenge and I've set it up with 5 for the entry limit, and then 12 hours into the challenge, I will change it to 50.

This will announce Nov 8th:

Repeat challenge Blue: Fish, flowers, eyes, jewels, jeans, birds, water, etc… but do not enter a nature photo that uses the sky as the blue element. The sky can be in the photo, but something else must be the point of interest and it should be blue.

The 1st challenge filled up in just a few hours. This one will open up with 5 as the limit for entries, and 12 hours after it has opened, I will set the limit to 50 to allow the other 1/2 of the planet a chance to enter.

-barb

Good show. I think any color challange will fill up pretty soon. Cheers.

Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 08:52 UTC
On Challenge:7542 (9 comments in total)

Agree...

Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 08:46 UTC as 4th comment
On Challenge:7472 (3 comments in total)

Additional rules:

"Please abide by dpr rules re nudity etc"

A nude nun? Haha!

Posted on Oct 27, 2012 at 06:36 UTC as 3rd comment
On Challenge:7416 (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

sveper: Great photos - congrats to the winner! Those idiots who voted 0.5 apparantly doesnt know the meaning of Bokeh.

I know, they are still idiots :)

Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
On Challenge:7416 (7 comments in total)

Great photos - congrats to the winner! Those idiots who voted 0.5 apparantly doesnt know the meaning of Bokeh.

Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 06:58 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
On photo Beech UC-43 Traveller in the Over saturated challenge (3 comments in total)

Forgot links to photos on the D17:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7109/7745400422_de0df6510d_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7123/7745368524_e617672409_o.jpg

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2012 at 08:45 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Beech UC-43 Traveller in the Over saturated challenge (3 comments in total)

Thanks for your comment Steve. Took the photo at Duxford and there were actually two Beech on display. The other was a blue/yellow D17 Staggerwing N295BS. Unfortunatly I did not get the "best" photo of that one. Later it did an unfortunate nose ower when taking off so it was kind of "out of display" rest of the show.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2012 at 08:35 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo fishing in the Rowboats challenge (1 comment in total)

So, my rowing boat is not a rowing boat! Thanks for the 0.5 vote who ever the d**k it was.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2012 at 09:53 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:6996 (12 comments in total)

Is a dingy with oars considered as a rowboat?

Posted on Jun 24, 2012 at 08:54 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On Challenge:6648 (5 comments in total)

Some very nice photos in this challange. Really like the No 1, and also No 6 is in my taste. What I like to see, is an explanation from the person, or those of you who voted low on each and every photo. I just want to understand your way of thinking. I think it should be stated in the rules that anyone who votes a 0.5 should also be obliged to write an explanation.

Posted on Apr 24, 2012 at 07:58 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo Spitfire MkVB in the Landing Airplanes challenge (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

sveper: Thanks all who voted on my photo, much appreciated!
Only one question: I wonder what it was that induced the low votes 1.0-2.0?

FYO, yes the Spit is actually landing. Shutter speed: 1/100 sec which means if it had been on take off, a clear propwash had been noticable, ie. full throttle. On landing a Spit almost cut the throttle: no prop wash. Second: a Spitfire normally have two flaps settings, fully up as on take off, and fully down, as on landing. On the photo they are fully down.

Cheers

Thanks for your input Raptor. I have not calibrated my Eizo FlexScan 22" monitor since I boght it almost 4 years ago. Maby it is time now. I may have noticed that others photos looks a bit dark.

Cheers

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 12:59 UTC
On photo Spitfire MkVB in the Landing Airplanes challenge (3 comments in total)

Thanks all who voted on my photo, much appreciated!
Only one question: I wonder what it was that induced the low votes 1.0-2.0?

FYO, yes the Spit is actually landing. Shutter speed: 1/100 sec which means if it had been on take off, a clear propwash had been noticable, ie. full throttle. On landing a Spit almost cut the throttle: no prop wash. Second: a Spitfire normally have two flaps settings, fully up as on take off, and fully down, as on landing. On the photo they are fully down.

Cheers

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 05:33 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
Total: 25, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »