This greediness, logic in pure failure mode and madness of arbitrarily claiming ownership of public space (and views WTF!) has to come to an end. Nobody should be able to dictate what others can and cannot do in public places as long as there is no direct and concrete impact on others using the public place.
The legislature development is collateral damage related to hard lobbying media corps’ attempts to reinforce their IPR in every possible way they just can think of.
In the end this is very dangerous development because this will severely hinder our freedom of speech and expression, and freedom to relay and receive information or ideas in any way we deem appropriate for ourselves.
Francis Carver: Europe -- is toast. Kaput. Fin. Finito. Ende.
But I guess the damnable Eurocrats did not get THAT important memo?
Kudos to Greece -- they are on their way to leave this whole sordid mess behind. Or soon will be.
What an ignorant comment that was.
Greece's departure from the monetary union i.e. Euro-zone, shall that ever happen, is nothing to be celebrated about.
If anything, I feel very sorry for the ordinary Greek who will suffer the most and are unable to protect themselves from the extreme, not seen in Europe after the WWII, devaluation of their assets and income.
I could even predict a military led coup d'état taking place, situation will get that ruthless.
Deorum: Seems funny how when he takes the camera out of the advertised bag, lens cap is already off.
Nice bag though, nice design
I for one always prefer keeping the lens cap on until I'm holding the camera securely and possibly have the neck strap where it should be. Well, I would guess one could still use lens caps, however if the bottom material has hard surface then having a lens cap grinding against it is not a good idea.
Interesting bag concept, I must say.
Lee Jay: This is what happens when you put marketing people together with legalized pot.
LOL! I do agree, but would like to add that the marketing guys don't really need external chemical encouragement; they just listen to themselves and seek peer-support for their dolt ideas in emancipating meetings, held in rooms full of remarkably expensive distractions (stuff feeding their imagination they would claim).
And this is the result, cerebral agony to those who actually understand something...
ThatCamFan: Or just use a polorizer, mit is wasting time.
The reflection is most and practically entirely polarized when the angle of incidence is at so called Brewster's angle:
In other angles the polarization is weak and no polarizer regardless of quality could effectively remove reflections, unless the light is for some reason polarized to begin with (like coming from LCD monitor or such).
These are very good. Intriguing property of #1 is that at first I thought the horizontal angle of dominant object, the shelter wall, was slightly off; but forgive me for suspecting such sloppiness... I was wrong.
Great collection, thank you for sharing!
Neez: Tamron version has stabilization.
Indeed, and with excellent optical performance. Even though competition is welcome, after the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD, I see little to no reason to launch a new lens into this category without stabilization. Tamron is that good.
I'm sure the Tokina is built impeccably though.
Marty4650: If these were branded by Hassleblad, they could sell for $62,000!
You boys have dirty mindsets... or is it just me with my skewed imagination?
As a patriotic Finn I am proud of both, our beautiful country and about Janne Voutilainen on how majestically he represents Finland in his art. Outstanding work, gallery class no question!
Virvatulet: Many seem to support the idea that one could arbitrarily dictate what others can do in public places. Using a public space inherently conveys an accord on limited privacy; the very prospect to be heard, seen and remembered by others.
As long as no physical change is forced on one's personal proximity, there really is nothing what one should do about other's freedom to choose how they use the immediate free space of theirs.
Passively collecting stray photons with a camera can not be objectively seen as excessive behaviour. It's also vital to remember to separate photographing from publishing (legislation variant). What can be legally seen shall be legally photographed (a priori), regardless of the circumstances affecting lawful publishing.
The ladies in the picture exercised their right to choose how they want to be seen and remembered when they use public space. Not willing to give even a split-second moment of their day to the memories of a gentleman randomly crossing their path.
Considering all the 24/7 surveillance videography, both government agency and private security firms arranged, it certainly shall be interesting to see how lawmakers will manage to retain any logic behind such bans. They won't if the ban targets solely photography; they might to some degree if the target is publishing.
In any case this is very troublesome development in the larger view of freedom of speech and expression. Photography is still seen as a threat in many societies, because of its perceived documentary and testimonial properties, making it therefore a convenient restriction target whenever a new excuse arises.
By the way, I follow pretty much the same "code of conduct" as you do. However, it is simply not even possible to ask people in many occasions, so I don't usually bother when I don't have to, given the circumstances.
rallyfan: Why harass the three elderly women in Spain?
@ Roland KarlssonI also have been demanded money for such a casual vacation photo. That was somewhat tainted spirited coming from people I was not specifically portraiture photographing.
Very nice set of various subjects and an appetizing treatment of such photography. Picture number two is my favourite, has a touch of Leni Riefenstahl's style approach in it. Thank you for sharing!
Many seem to support the idea that one could arbitrarily dictate what others can do in public places. Using a public space inherently conveys an accord on limited privacy; the very prospect to be heard, seen and remembered by others.
AstroStan: here is a well timed shot:http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html(APOD)
That is not exactly a fair comparison, but then again, moderation is a fatal thing.
Virvatulet: A dangerous hobby for rectless addrenaline junkies...Enjoying the cenery though!
Whatever floats your boat... bro.
About appropriate terminology, hedonistic is used in scientific literature.
"Who Takes Risks in High-Risk Sports? A Typological Personality Approach"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599709
"Epidemiology of Injury in Adventure and Extreme Sports"http://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/338558
You wouldn't care to make a guess how many incidents USCG handles in relation to port departures? The point is that not all risks are equal.
About the hedonistic aspect, systemic adrenaline rush if anything is a personal thing, regardless the source of such experience.
"I just don't care if some individual wants to climb a mountain--as long as he/she isn't trashing the place, and has some comprehension of the risks."
I think we largely share common view here; of course, there is the question about accountability if and when something goes quite not as pre planned and outside help is sought for. For the record, no, I do not wish to deny mountain climbing exploration.
One could greatly expand the list you started. But as long as you don't differentiate activities with useful outcome or purpose, like the ones you mentioned, from recreational more or less hedonistic pursuits; that would be merely waste of bits.
PS. Sorry about the typos in my original post.
A dangerous hobby for rectless addrenaline junkies...Enjoying the cenery though!
Thorgrem: So politics win a photo contest. Such a shame. (not that I have anything against homosexuality)
Deductive reasoning would be a good starting point since we are not talking about matters of taste. Conclusion then comes thru logic with universal premises like all people are to be seen and treated equal.