Thomas Richter

Thomas Richter

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2007

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On Canon EOS 100D/Rebel SL1 Hands-on Preview preview (355 comments in total)

ISO 200 looks slightly mottled already (see borders in lighthouse sample).
Mid-ISO shots of low contrast subjects are missing again.
Canon fail. DPR fail.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2013 at 06:39 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Hands-on Canon EOS 6D preview article (590 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Todd: "To distinguish it from the more expensive 5D Mark III, the 6D features a simpler, 11-point AF system with a single cross-type focus sensor." Rubbish. Back to only focusing with the center AF point? I always said the 40D/50D had better AF than the 5D 2, now the 6D has joined the substandard AF club.

Focus & recompose doesn't even work for shooting the kids; let alone sports and action. I usually need to trigger the shot in less than one second.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 12:20 UTC
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

smallcams: In case the review didn't mention it, the battery life is pretty darn amazing.

Yea, about half of what the 2006 Fuji F30 did.

LOL

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 14:52 UTC
On DSC01502 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Again no mid-ISO shots of low contrast subjects. It's a pity.
ISO 400 is completely missing in the samples.
Most shots are either base ISO or in the 800-1600.
Then the high ISO shots are often w/o detail or the detail is not in focus.
That way it's hard to draw any conclusions about the ISO range that COULD actually be used beyond ISO125.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 07:44 UTC as 1st comment
On Canon issues product advisory for PowerShot S100 article (49 comments in total)

Tape - again?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2012 at 06:53 UTC as 21st comment
On Sony DSC-RX100 preview (544 comments in total)

Dear Sony,

Make such a camera with 6..10 megapixel and I'll buy it blindly!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 16, 2012 at 17:36 UTC as 73rd comment | 6 replies
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III low-light ISO series samples article (319 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZAnton: Using low light conditions DPReview has certainly improved the ISO tests, although there are no similar shots for other cameras for comparison (except for G1X).
Second problem is, that all objects there (except the rat) are big (compared to the pixel size) and of the even color or moderately changing color.
Such conditions is excellent for the NR, but they rarely seen in the real life, (unless you are making a macro of a pencil in the dark toilet. :-))

The real troubles come on the small objects (hairs, leaves if they are far away enough) etc.
So guys, put the rat in the focus please. It looks like "rat quality" degrades very fast even here.

Completely agree that the setup is not good for showing ISO performance. No in focus low contrast detail, so NR can go in and smooth away all the noise and images look fine, except for appearing somewhat less 3-dimensional due to reduced color differentiation. But human eye is very forgiving w.r.t color.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 15:42 UTC

Small sensor size is possibly because Nikon (and likely also Canon) want to protect their DSLR sales. Their reckoning is probably that many potential buyers of such cameras don't put the highest focus on sensor size (upgraders from compacts may not have all the knowledge about IQ that is around in the forums here.)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2011 at 07:41 UTC as 361st comment
On Just Posted: Sony NEX-7 pre-production samples gallery article (105 comments in total)

I would like to see more "mid ISO" shots in all the sample galleries. ISOs between 400 and 1250 of low contrast scenes with fine details. Thus far most of the shots in most galleries are either ISO 100/200, or high ISO (1600+) with scenes that do not have much detail. Thus the interesting part is masked out. The ISO100 is always great and of ISO1600+ nobody expects exceptional detail and color differentiation. I'm looking for really clean ISO 800 in a crop camera and I suspect that's still not available (depending on personal expectations of clean-ness, of course).

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 07:01 UTC as 12th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9