Tal Shachar: film is an environmental disaster, go digital now!
@AlanG. Seems to me we all exaggerate or take numbers from the ceiling to support our own agendas as none of us have any idea on the total energy/materials used to produce and deliver neither film nor digital cameras and accessories. I am amazed though at quantities of film used that you mentioned. It must have been full scale commercial operation. I went on 3 weeks vacation during which I used probably 12 rolls of 120 film. I have never found myself saving film, I shoot whenever I wanted. Casual photographer won't have enough opportunities or time to use that amount of film in a quarter of the year.
bmcdad: Its like saying AT&T will restart production of Rotary Phones... Art does not require a time machine. You can't reminisce evolution to a halt.
@RPJG You can use film because you may enjoy looking at 6x9, 6x17 or 4x5 transparencies on the light table. You can scan them as well. Film cameras also came down in price (even professional ones). For someone shooting moderate amount of photographs the cost may be comparable with the cost of ownership of digital 35mm camera, trading convenience for larger negative sizes and sometimes better/nicer experience. If it is just a hobby the choice of equipment does not have to be driven by efficiency and cost effectiveness.
Donnie G: Nearly 1,000 comments about a corporate ad campaign from this site alone. Ha ha ha, LOL. Seems the teaser was very successful in reminding average people and businesses that Canon is involved in a lot more than just making consumer cameras and lenses. BRILLIANT!
There is a huge difference between buying 300$ camera and 1000$ camera. I am also not sure why you assume that so different consumer groups need and want mirrorless cameras. None of my friends, casual users, even think about camera as a system. For 300$ they want complete package and do not care nor think about expanding it. Only select few casual users can and want to spend 1000$ on a camera, not to mention think about diving even deeper by buying additional lenses.
Last time I checked Canon had its own advanced compact in the form of G series. They do not focus much on interchangeable system but how large is that user group? You also say that DSLR market is saturated. What about mirrorless scene where so many players deliver similar products with little to no differentiation. Maybe Canon's strategy is sound. I do not think mirrorless is so entrenched. Current mirrorless systems have such flows that single good product would cause flood of converts.
Rick Knepper: Last thing I want is a commercial photographer and his entourage hogging up space at overlooks and other viewpoints and blocking trails. Besides, the permit is a formality. I see very few requests for permits being denied if any. What I don't like are commercial photo workshop operators and their customers. Many are respectful of non-workshop shooters but some are downright rude. And they suck up permits to places like the Wave while individuals go wanting.
You think that proposed law, as described, would change anything for the better? I strongly disagree. This is exactly permit system that makes it difficult for the individual to obtain access to Wave and other places. Commercial operator, professional photographer or a persons associated with government agencies that manage places are in an advantage caused they do it for a living, intricately know the procedure, have connections, etc. The proposed law means that the access or use of many more places will be made more difficult for an occasional users. The flood of permit requests will also require additional office work to process or it will overburden existing services. I am not sure this is what the country needs. It is rather inefficient way to increase federal income.
AV Janus: Great photos. Thanks for posting them.Love seeing the change people can make when they are given the opportunity.
Its funny how the post war "Wirtschaftswunder" never seems to take a lasting foothold in the far east and middle east. The US never seems to liberate them all the way till the end I guess. I guess they are not making the same mistakes like they did in Germany, where they just managed to stay and rebuild the country for 30-40yrs./irony ends/
@reps2. I think majority of photographs carry some hidden message. Message can also be passed through conscious selection of photo gallery. Given that I find DPR a venue to discuss various topics, just as photographs show various subjects and pass various messages. I also did not venture to argue over Kriegsschuldfrage for the simple fact that there is no frage.
In addition to question of Germany post-war rebuilt effort I simply found the selection of news/topics on that special day rather intriguing. It stimulated me to go back in news history and check June 6th. DPR does not often commemorates anniversaries of important historic events so I assume plain ignorance. Though it is rather disturbing it is in line with the level of western historiography and collective knowledge of western societies. One could only wonder if attitudes were different had German army bulldozed part of Paris rather than perform its atrocities behind the invisible curtain of Eastern Europe.
@Zerg2905. I believe you and I haven't claimed otherwise though my stand is that for every action there is a reaction. My, maybe too strong, response was partly driven by the surprising fact that on the day of 75th anniversary of most deadly war in the history (so far) DPR chose to show few mediocre pictures of the capitol of the country that started that terrible war. Pictures showed here do not create any emotions and do not give justice to so important the anniversary. When I think of this day I have that picture in mind: http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=8527
Falconeyes has some point. It is much easier to rebuild if you have capital and knowhow. US supplied capital, some of know how was in place. The east countries were not so lucky. US would never agree to help countries behind iron courtain and those countries, on Russian instigation, would never agree to take help if that was offered. Regarding know-how, German and Russian occupation forces made sure to mass murder that part of societes in the first place. Together with total demolition of infrastructure and breaking many social ties they left countries, poorer than western counterparts in the first place, economically devastated and moved back a century. I think the barbarians invading Roman Empire would be ashamed.
After reading few sections of that review I wonder what are the advantages of that new camera over Nex-7 and Nex-6. It looks like measured dunamic range is the same as Nex-7 and a little worse than Nex-6. The visible noise look very similar in all ISO levels. The usability may be an answer but having no experience in using any of those cameras I am not sure - A6000 has more scroll wheels than Nex-6 but it also has lower resolution EVF. Actually that new camera looks like Nex-7 rebadged as A6000. Is there any reason one would spend 800 USD for it rather than go and pick up hardly used Nex-7 for about half that price?
Nukunukoo: Now if only Canon can release a model with better DR with my PP, I'll be ready to go back to them!
Interesting. Reading between the lines it loks like you feel somewhat dissatisfied and cheated but nevertheless continue supporting dishonest practices of the manufacturer because of some minor advantage in captured dynamic range offered by its product? Really interesting.
digitalshooter: Right I can see all of the Sony faithful on the Sony forum ordering this camera!
Enthusiast camera at 12K, don't think so! Another slap in the face to the long time a mount user!
This is actually good news. I wouldn't mind offloading my A mount lenses to someone willing to pay extra. I might even be generous and ask only double regular sell price.
qwertyasdf: Fairly speaking, bad job, Hassy. It's a big step back from the Lunar and StellarWhy no marble grip, diamond knobs? I guess everybody would love a camera that weighted a tonne.
Lean times. Even in Hasselblad products one can see cost cutting. Serves well new wave of upper classes. Executive shell with BestBuy innards to show sympathy with working classes. Are you being served?
ProfHankD: Rated lowest of the full-frame cameras? I have an A7 that I'm using for very technical work and I can't agree. Aside from any IQ arguments, I think the EVF alone should justify gold, as would the fact that it can use just about any lens ever made.
However, DPReview did catch my biggest gripe: the 1/60s A mode preference. Basically, all Sony models have followed the 1/focal_length rule, but they have a long tradition of assuming unknown lenses are 50mm, hence selecting 1/60s. Allowing the user to manually set the minimum speed would be a step in the right direction, but the real fix is to let the user tell the camera about the unchipped lenses and maintain a list of such lens data to select from instead of the "shoot without lens" choice. That lens info should go into the EXIF and be used to compute 1/focal_length, or perhaps even allow a user-specified default slowest shutter speed to be registered for each lens.
Well. I thought about such firmware feature since I acquired A900 few years ago. It would be more useful to me than many camera improvements to date. It seems however that it is beyond the skills of Sony firmware developers to implement it.
NancyP: Nothing here suggests that the damage is limited to CC customers. People who bought their software outright may also be at risk.
This is a good point. If I remember correctly one must create account in order to buy software like Lightroom or PS directly from Adobe. I do not remember what credit card payment system they use but they might be storing that information too if you buy online.
Valentinian: The sculptor's work was exposed to the public the same way a song is copyrighted and published. Anybody who sings that song in concert for a profit should pay something to the author.Of course the USPS had to pay the sculptor.As someone in this forum already pointed out, it is very strange that the US government didn't reserve all rights to reproduce and use in any way the sculptor's work when his work was commissioned and he was paid.Isn't that what happens, for instance, when you enter one of your photos into a photographic contest?
I think you mentioned real issue. I also do not understand why, after spending huge sum of money, those that comissioned the sculpture did not ensure the sale agreement included all rights to its future use. I would still want the government agencies enforce the rule never to commision any future work from that artist. The predatory legal behavior should be discouraged. Unfortunately that would probably infringe some other misused law like equal opportunity or something.
smafdy: This is BS.
Did the sculptor put the snow on his sculpture? No. The environment, itself changed the entire nature of the photo.
As for the caption. it is just that — a caption.
I can't draw a picture of a Mustang without Ford suing me for copyright infringement, now?
As for the monument in question, it is a 3 dimensional work. A photograph, OTOH, is a 2D representation, and in now way, shape, or form, a "copy." In fact, it is impossible, as a matter of basic physics, for a photograph to copy anything that wasn't already 2 dimensional, in the first place.
Additionally, and as an aside, I have visited this monument, and feel the sculpture compares unfavorably to those which surround it. The work looks hurried and of fairly low quality. Gaylord has milked the taxpayer, twice.
I find that reasoning flawed. Why should artists be specially protected? Noone forced them to sell their work cheaply. They could demand high price and potentially face less or no buyers. If they consciously accepted lower price they should live with that like every other grown up human being.
Regarding the issue of USPS paying the legal costs. I would hope few things happen:
Person(s) responsible for issuing stamps without fully checking legal ramifications (if they are found guilty of negligence) should pay consequences
If sculpture was erected using public money so should person(s) who did not ensure it can be used by goverment agences without any limits
The artist should be blacklisted from any other public art spending. If he bites the hand that feeds him let him find another mecenas.
thx1138: I have a strong feeling Canon will issue an identical report with regards their EOS M. Interestingly both parties were arrogantly late to the mirrorless segment and both offer flawed (in different ways) cameras that do not standout or offer a compelling reason to buy. It will intersting whether Canon bother with a EOS M2 or whether the 100D was an indication they will stick to DSLR's.
I would venture to speculate that all companies - Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic and Fuji, will release reports of falling sell figures of mirrorless cameras. Wasn't there a report few weeks ago stating that mirrorless camera shipments fell about 18% globally? If only Canon and Nikon accounted for that drop that would mean that somehow those slow and ridiculed giants in a short time captured more market share than "innovative" and sexy "upstarts".
Fox Fisher: Why people are obsessed with sensor sizes? If you insist saying that APS-C is always better than m4/3 then Medium Format should be above all... Lets all go buy a medium format then.... as you can see comparing a camera with just a sensor size is irrational. It's all comes down to individual buyers taste and use and the end of the day.
Spec wise it's a great camera. It fills the boxes where Olympus E-P5 left empty. It will be painful to sell my beloved RX100 for this awesome camera with awesome lens selections.
I think sensor size matters. I use mirrorless camera solely as a body for old MF lenses. Smaller sensor means it is harder to find lenses with wide enough angles of view. There is always option of stitching multiple exposures but to do it properly it requires more skill than I currently possess. FF mirrorless would be perfect.
Atlasman: The industry (SLR) is stalled by Canikon and their lack of interest in producing mirrorless systems: the future of photography.The old pond is drying up!
Mirrorless cameras maybe the future of photography but if the numbers are correct it looks like consumers do not think the current crop of mirrorless cameras are the glimpse of that future. Report shows same drop in shipments for both SLR and mirrrorless cameras, so I guess market is saturated and there is no much innovation in both areas, real innovation that would compel users to buy or replace camera bodies.
chekist: Though it is not clear what the outcome of the collaboration would be I am excited to see what could happen when two of the most innovative companies join forces.
Going by past experience some probable results can include innovative products that don't sell or corporate scandals of the highest magnitude ;-)
micahmedia: ...this is sad. The new digi OM looks good. Real good. It's a shame the hard workers that comprise the rest of the company will suffer the poor decisions of the board members.
On one hand I definitely can. I was using DSLR without that feature for a few years with no issues.
On the other hand I can not. In the same way as I can not imagine using camera without features I have mentioned in my previous post.
I am not sure I agree with your definition of innovation. It seems to me you are contradicting yourself. Art filters are not standard in professional cameras. There are also few different implementations of sensor cleaning solutions. The common goal in photo industry should be and hopefully is delivering cameras with better image quality. Applying your definition of innovation would mean that any company that comes up with new and better sensor is not really innovative.
If however I apply term innovation as defined in wiki or other dictionary sites then I can see many innovators in camera market. Olympus somehow does not seem to lead the pack. Of cause I do not have knowledge on the number of patents registered by each company, so it is just my 2c