JimsPC

The trial one I tried of lr4 was in no way better than ACDSee, I tried several at the time I moved to ACDSee pro6. ACDSee was the best and paintshop pro x5 was the worst of a whole lot of them,...

I gave Adobe the 'move on' last year after they failed to allow me to process E-M5 files in my lightroom 3.6.
Moved to ACDSee 6 pro. The Raw converter is as good as Adobe and it gives me freedom to...

I have used converters from PSE10, ASP, ACDSee6pro and Olympus2 using the same images with all settings at 0 (to TIFF), then put the image sets side by side @100% and 200% in PSE (calibrated...

Yes LR3 does not support my E-M5 so I downloaded all the editors and tried them out. ACDSee6pro was easily the best and now (with Topaz) the only photo software on the PC and it allowed me to...

The pen lenses on Sony sensors are magic. My pet is the 38/1.8 (have 2) on my em5, better than on my ep2. now need a...

I just found a problem.
The package is in imperial measurement, despite all countries now being officially metric, though some are slow adopters of the adoption made some years ago (USA comes to...

Yes, agree with lighting comment and file mgt so much easier.

Been using lightroom 3 and PSE 5 -10 for years. LR is a pain having to import all the time, not my style.
I just tried LR4.1, Photo director 2011, and ACDsee pro 6 and Aftershot Pro.
Tried to down...